Posted on 03/22/2007 11:28:22 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
LOL, as if the pro-Rudy stance wasn't a dead give-away. Only liberals could support someone as pro-baby murder, pro-gay, and anti-constitution as Rudy Giuliani.
Well said, Rudy!
I read the post. I find Giulinai's actions reprehensible, but the description was accurate. I find nothing wrong with it.
I don't appreciate your personal attacks, either.
As an American I find that comment offensive
"RUDY DEMANDS YOU WORSHIP THE STATE"
Your round robin posting is like a cluster ----!
Do you condone this?
I've been polite until this thread.
I guess the idea is to run off all who dare to disagree.
Is this Free Republic?
It's not the one I joined so many years ago.
I guess it comes down to the question of; "Do you want a small glass of water or will you hold out till you can get a big one?"
Do you want to live to fight another day or do you want to die?
Do you want the conservative agenda to move forward (and yes, possibly not move at all) or do you want Hillary or Saddam moving us backward, giving in on the WOT and abandoning the state of Israel?
Which freedoms and liberties are you talking about? There are some "freedoms" most of the posters on this site don't support (e.g., abortions) and others we cherish (e.g., the 1st and 2nd Amendments).
Frankly, we won't have to worry about the gun grabbers much after the SCOTUS rules on the 2nd District case re: gun bans. We have to worry about the socialists (e.g., taking away the freedom to make a living) and the professional politicians like McCain and his Dem friends who would like to take away our freedom to criticize politicians.
ROFLMAO! You just gave Politicalmom grief for language, and you post that thinly veiled expletive? Hypocrite!
No KIDDING!
I didn't even use any profanity. Notice how it is MY telling the truth that is condemned, not Giulian's immorality?
"Do you want the conservative agenda to move forward (and yes, possibly not move at all) or do you want Hillary or Saddam moving us backward,"
First, saddam is dead.
Second, Rudy would not move the conservative agenda forward. Quite the contrary - other than the WOT, there isn't much about him that advances a conservative agenda. There would be much more of a liberal agenda advanced than a conservative one.
I'll agree with you there. You have NOT been polite on this thread. Another Rudytooter coming unhinged. I shouldn't say "coming" unhinged. Supporting rudy and abortion is a sure indicator of diminished capacity. And to think, I used to have such respect for you, and looked forward to reading your early morning postings.
EXACTLY! They can't handle the truth!
You're criticizing MY language? Just because you don't use the actual word doesn't mean you aren't using a vulgarity. I would
NEVER use such a term.
"Are these posters here to disrupt party unity?"
I suggest you look at Jim Robinson's posts about rudy and then reconsider the "party unity" approach.
The biggest threat to party unity is coming from a liberal republican from new york. Pushing him to lead the GOP will do more to destroy the party than anything the democrats could ever do.
Your posts and mine are out there.
Let others judge.
I've had postings with Jim Robinson.
You are another matter.
You are a detriment to this forum.
Rudy just might lose and lose bad. There are a lot of "South Park" types out there who may just turn out to vote against him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.