Posted on 03/21/2007 8:23:31 AM PDT by CNS
(CNSNews.com) - A Democratic lawmaker has introduced a bill that would ban the sale of traditional incandescent light bulbs - which are less energy-efficient, prompting claims that they contribute to "global warming" - one day after a colleague told a press conference that legislating a ban would be a "last choice."
As Cybercast News Service reported last week, Rep. Don Manzullo (R-Ill.) and Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) held a news conference Wednesday calling for more efficient lighting options, and Manzullo said "the last thing we want to do is force legislation down people's throats."
One day later, Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.) introduced legislation that would set target dates for certain types of light bulbs to be prohibited for sale in the United States.
Harman calls the bill "an important first step toward making every household, business and public building in America more energy-efficient."
"This legislation, while a small step, could have an enormous impact," she said in a posting on the liberal Huffington Post blog. "And hopefully, it can help transform America into an energy-efficient and energy-independent nation."
An average traditional incandescent bulb based on a filament emits 12-15 lumens per watt (a measurement of the bulb's lighting output.) Harman's bill would require all bulbs to produce 60 lumens-per-watt by January 2012; 90 lumens-per-watt by January 2016; and 120 lumens-per-watt by January 2020.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
"In total, Al Gore paid nearly $30,000 in combined electricity and
natural gas bills for his Nashville estate in 2006."
Digital radio is just now getting going seriously. It'll be a few more years.
There you go, again, injecting facts into an argument.
Thank God they are ahead on this issue! It is my number one issue that I want Congress to get done.../heavy sarc.
Do you think this person has any idea what fluorescent light bulbs do when used around rotating machinery?
They DIM? They may work but in an either on or off mode. I thought that fluorescents produced light from the ionized gas which is either in an ionized state or not; a binary state. There may be enough current through a dimmer switch to fire the gas into an ionized state, but not t modify the output except for off.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
A REPUBLICAN signed onto this legislative myth.
The Stupid Party continues...
3. Can I use a compact fluorescent light bulb with a dimmer switch?
To use a compact fluorescent bulb on a dimmer switch, you must buy a bulb that's specifically made to work with dimmers (check the package). GE makes a dimming compact fluorescent light bulb (called the GE Longlife Plus Soft White Energy Saving Bulb) that is specially designed for use with dimming switches. We don't recommend using regular compact fluorescent bulbs with dimming switches, since this can shorten bulb life. (Using a regular compact fluorescent bulb with a dimmer will also nullify the bulb's warranty.)
http://www.gelighting.com/na/business_lighting/faqs/cfl.htm#3
Yes, Although they greatly prefer feeling over thinking, they actually can think, but they are genetically incapable of foreseeing consequences.
"Florescent lights wont come on in really cold weather. They would be worthless for outdoor use in the northern states."
This is not true. I have 26 outdoor lights around the parameter of my house. I live in Idaho and often we go weeks at zero or below. I switched all of them to mini fluorescent almost 10 years ago. There has never been a problem with them starting.
BTW, I've only had to change them twice in 10 years. (I changed all 26 each time, even the ones that are still working)
My outdoor lighting bill went from $1.04 a day to $.17 a day. Of course the bulbs cost more, but I buy them at Home Depot when they are on sale.
Here is why this is REALLY happening.
Regular light bulbs can now be bought for 25 CENTS each thanks to overseas manufacturing.
Compact florecents cost no less than 4 DOLLARS.
FOLLOW THE MONEY.
Who is making these new bulbs and how much money did they contribute to these politicians. WHO OWNS THE PATENTS FOR THE FLORECENT BULBS?
There is no patent royalty to be paid on regular bulbs!
FOLLOW THE MONEY!!!!!!
Practical LED lights have really only been around since 1989 or so. Give it another few years and the kinks will be worked out on the quality of light side.
The quality is improving fast. Interestingly, that's only happening because of massive JAPANESE government support.
It's going to happen whether there is a law or not.
More stupidity from the RATS. Fluorescents are no more eco-friendly because they have mercury in them.
Congress doesn't want Little Suzy to have an EZ Bake Oven.
Why Friday? Can't do Sunday, that would validate the Christian's day of rest. Can't do Saturday, that would validate the Jews' rules against working on the Sabbath. Who worships on Friday, hmmmm?
Incandecent = no royalty payment
Florecent = royalty payment
no choice = royalty payment
Pssst......hey dude....Wanna buy a light bulb?????
Oh good grief. What's next, charging taxes for the air we breathe? grrrrrr.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.