Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House panel subpoenas White House aides (Bush, DON'T GIVE IN OR IT WILL NEVER END!)
MSNBC ^ | 3/21/2007 | NBC

Posted on 03/21/2007 8:20:29 AM PDT by tobyhill

WASHINGTON - A House panel on Wednesday defied the White House and authorized subpoenas for President Bush’s political adviser, Karl Rove and other top aides, setting up a constitutional showdown over the firings of eight federal prosecutors.

By voice vote and without objection, the House Judiciary subcommittee on commercial and administrative law decided to compel the president’s top aides to testify publicly and under oath about their roles in the firings.

The White House has refused to budge in the controversy, standing by embattled Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and insisting that the firings were appropriate.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: All

We freepers sure taught those pubs a 'lesson' last nov, didnt we? /s


21 posted on 03/21/2007 8:36:50 AM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fooman

Needs to be repeated over and over to the unloyal ungrateful that wanted to punish the GOP. Elections have consequences. Pelosi and Reid really are working hard to let our enemy kill us.


22 posted on 03/21/2007 8:38:25 AM PDT by jrooney ( Hold your cards close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bw17

From another article: "By voice vote and without dissent, the House Judiciary subcommittee on commercial and administrative law decided to compel the president's top aides to testify publicly and under oath about their roles in the firings."

The Republican members of the sub-committee:

Canon, UT
Jordan, OH
Keller, FL
Feeney, FL
Franks, AZ


23 posted on 03/21/2007 8:38:34 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: highball
If they want to go after Gonzales for not telling the truth or mistaken communications then fine but Executive Privilege extends to aides and council.
24 posted on 03/21/2007 8:38:50 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

My contempt for these idiots has no words.


25 posted on 03/21/2007 8:38:53 AM PDT by Just Lori (There's nothing democratic about Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

Unfortunately, Congress would not stop at Cheney, and the end result would be Nancy Pelosi as President of the United States.


26 posted on 03/21/2007 8:39:11 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

This is something that can't be changed by law. It would need to be done by constitutional amendment or court ruling.


27 posted on 03/21/2007 8:40:10 AM PDT by preacher (A government which robs from Peter to pay Paul will always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

I think they'd have a tough time taking down President Cheney. He wouldn't go quietly. Or easily.


28 posted on 03/21/2007 8:40:29 AM PDT by Mike Bates (Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
If they want to go after Gonzales for not telling the truth or mistaken communications then fine but Executive Privilege extends to aides and council.

Not disagreeing with you.

Gonzales is toast, though. He either didn't know what his deputy would say to Congress, in which case he's incompetent, or he did know, in which case he allowed the deputy to lie and he's a crook.

Either way, Gonzales should be ousted and a line drawn in the sand: no further.

29 posted on 03/21/2007 8:41:12 AM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

Nor should GW.


30 posted on 03/21/2007 8:41:16 AM PDT by jrooney ( Hold your cards close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bw17
The House Republicans are not the solution, they are a part of the problem. We are in middle of the development of a Wimpified Nation.
31 posted on 03/21/2007 8:42:35 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

Back at ya.

I wont forget until '08.

Bush should have dunked ALL 93 of them after he won 04. Then he could have gone after the vote fraud, socks burgler, land boy reid, william jefferson and schumkie messing with investigations.


32 posted on 03/21/2007 8:43:42 AM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

That's interesting. I was asking this morning why the Dems are after Gonzalez, who has so far seemed like an unambitions, inoffensive, go along to get along type of AG who wouldn't really cause them any problems. But perhaps there's more to it.


33 posted on 03/21/2007 8:44:14 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Republic Rocker
what exactly would be the charge or crime .... ?

Being a Republican.

34 posted on 03/21/2007 8:45:15 AM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Separation of Powers would require changing the Articles which I believe are sacrosanct.


35 posted on 03/21/2007 8:45:36 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

I think it's safe to say that Bush will stand his ground on this. Giving in would be unthinkable and, as you said, lead to an unending stream of investigations if all Congress has to do is issue a subpoena to get someone in front of them.


36 posted on 03/21/2007 8:46:45 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: livius

They don't want U.S. Attorneys who will investigate Democrats. Leaky Leahy is leading the charge.


37 posted on 03/21/2007 8:46:53 AM PDT by popdonnelly (Hillary - the Empty Pants Suit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: highball
I wish Gonzales would resign and make sure it's well known it's his own decision then the President should just recess appoint a hardcore Republican to take his place. The AG needs to tell these US Attorneys that they need to get these cases to the Grand Juries regardless of party and let them decide how much is needed for an indictment. Jefferson is still walking free.
38 posted on 03/21/2007 8:48:24 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: livius
I was asking this morning why the Dems are after Gonzalez, who has so far seemed like an unambitions, inoffensive, go along to get along type of AG who wouldn't really cause them any problems. But perhaps there's more to it.

All you have to be is a friend of Bush and they'll want to destroy you.

This is precisely why we needed to be playing hardball with the liberals starting back in 01 or 02. It's too late now.

39 posted on 03/21/2007 8:49:47 AM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

I'd forgotten about the other leaks that were under investigation. Presumably, the investigations have been going on quietly all this while, so long that most of us had forgotten about them. But according to a poster above, they're almost finished. So this Dem hysteria suddenly starts to make a lot more sense.


40 posted on 03/21/2007 8:51:52 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson