Posted on 03/18/2007 11:17:46 PM PDT by FairOpinion
Can America's mayor win support from enough social conservatives to win the Republican nomination?
Maybe not, but social conservatives should think long and hard before they decide to pass on Giuliani. This may be difficult advice to credit. Giuliani is thoroughly alienated from the dominant concerns of the social right.
Mayor Giuliani delivered what they needed most. He reclaimed New York City from the toxic leftism of his predecessors but in the process identified himself with the moral elements of their leftism.
social conservatives are concerned about social rot and Giuliani is one of the very few executives in the history of the world with a record of reversing rot. This is appealing.
On September 11, 2001 and the days that followed he auditioned for commander in chief and the audition went well. This too is appealing. If we don't bestir ourselves to win our war with Islamic fascism, the moral state of our civilization won't matter. We won't be around to wallow in sin.
Social conservatives could benefit from the presidency of someone who agrees with them less but fights for them more. This is the crux of Giuliani's appeal to the social right and every other Republican constituency. He is a fighter, and Republicans of all sorts are sick and tired of turning the other cheek and seeking common cause with the enemy both at home and abroad.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
That's the standard Clintonista technique that some Rudy boosters, to their shame, have adapted for their own use - call critics "haters" so you don't have to address the valid points being raised by the critics.
Thing is, judges that are in-line with Giuliani's beliefs might not be what we're looking for.
FYI, IIRC, I hear often that Rudy's judge selections are predetermined to be those that the judicial committee in New York selects...which would be okay, if the committee members weren't appointed BY THE MAYOR.
You're dreaming.
|
Giuliani | Clinton | Dem Platform | GOP Platform |
---|---|---|---|---|
Abortion on Demand | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Partial Birth Abortion | SupportsOpposed NY ban | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Roe v. Wade | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Taxpayer Funded Abortions | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Embryonic Stem Cell Research | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Federal Marriage Amendment | Opposes | Opposes | Opposes Defined at state level |
Supports |
Gay Domestic Partnership/ Civil Unions |
Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Openly Gay Military | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Defense of Marriage Act | Opposes | Opposes | Opposes | Supports |
Amnesty for Illegal Aliens | Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Special Path to Citizenship for Illegal Aliens |
Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Tough Penalties for Employers of Illegal Aliens |
Opposes | Opposes | Opposes | Supports |
Sanctuary Cities/ Ignoring Immigration Law |
Supports | Supports | Supports | Opposes |
Protecting 2nd Amendment | Opposes |
Opposes | Opposes Supports bans |
Supports |
Confiscating Guns | Supports Confiscated as mayor. Even bragged. |
Supports | Supports Supports bans |
Opposes |
'Assault' Weapons Ban | Supports | Supports | Supports | |
Frivolous Lawsuits Against Gun Makers |
Supports Filed One Himself |
Supports | Opposes | |
Gun Registration/Licenses | Supports | Supports | Opposes | |
War in Afghanistan | Supports | Supports Voted for it |
Supports | Supports |
War in Iraq | Supports | Supports Voted for it |
Supports Weak support |
Supports |
Patriot Act | Supports | Supports Voted for it 2001 & 2006 |
Opposes | Supports |
My God, you get gayer with every post...
When Giuliani was mayor, he was attacked by the liberal press for not reaching out to constituencies (i.e. blacks)that didn't vote for him. In a presidential election, the Democratic activists will be united behind the Democratic nominee.
So?
That doesn't change the fact that Giuliani is as hard left as any conceivable Democrat nominee. Why in the heck do you want two hard-left evil parties in America?
"Why in the heck do you want two hard-left evil parties in America?"
Who says I do? I don't see "compassionate" conservative Republicans standing up to Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. There's pros and cons with all the Republican candidates.
Social conservatives don't get "tripped up" here at all -- because that's a very, very big IF you've posted there at the start of the second sentence.
The notion that a person in public office who has a well-documented track record of adamant opposition to a "strict constructionist" approach to constitutional law would take it upon himself to nominate strict constructionists to the Federal judiciary is downright silly.
No, he's not. Rudy Giuliani threw away every shred of credibility he had as a "law and order guy" when he openly (and proudly) announced that he would violate provisions of the 1996 Federal immigration reform law for the sake of political expediency.
Between this story and the bizarre circumstances surrounding Bernie Kerik, he's got way too much baggage on the "law and order" front.
Drama queens
?
From your posts I'd have to say that if there is any kind of queen around here you would be the one to have the inside info ...
Pro abortion, gun grabbing, gay loving liberals are not what the GOP needs to put forth . If thats the best we have to offer .... we're done.
period
And the fact that so many people can't see that is just a symptom of the problem.
I don't care if everyone else in the entire world wants to call rudy a conservative ..... call him a duck if you want , it dosen't make it so.
Rudy's frontrunner status among Republicans and conservatives tells quite a different story. Thankfully.
In other words, you can blame gun control laws for the LEVEL of crime, but not for the changes that occured at times that the gun control laws did not change.
Also, the Bush administration caved when the Republican base didn't get on board with the Miers nomination.
Can anyone in this universe imagine the Witch caving to the Republican base if they tried to raise hell about one of *her* nominees?
Exactly. A justice doesn't have to be pro-life to view Roe v. Wade for what it is: an outrageous and embarrassing power grab by the Supreme Court that had no underpinning in the Constitution.
I'd take a pro-abortion justice who read the Constitution as leaving abortion to be regulated by the States or the feds---or not, as those governments were persuaded to do---any day.
You certainly know a lot. And certainly, too.
You're wrong. There've been at least a couple of folks on FR saying they'd vote for MRS BILL CLINTON over Rudy Giuliani.
That's preposterous.
Yep.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.