Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: anita
Isn't he a democrat/Clinton appointee also responsible for the Fitz-bungle?

That would be the one.

44 posted on 03/18/2007 6:07:40 AM PDT by Bahbah (Regev, Goldwasser & Shalit, we are praying for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Bahbah; anita
Isn't he a democrat/Clinton appointee also responsible for the Fitz-bungle?

IMHO, this was in no way a bungle, but a deliberate treasonous act in a conspiracy to unseat a president in wartime. The bungle was Ashcroft's in recusing himself instead of RE-fusing to go along with it, and George W. Bush's in allowing Fitzfong to be appointed after both parties had "agreed" that special prosecutors were bad things.

Of course, the naive republicans didn't realize that what the dems meant was that a special prosecutor for dems is bad, but for republicans is good.

189 posted on 03/18/2007 7:50:53 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Waiting impatiently for a conservative party to rise from the ashes of the wimpy republican party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson