Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Idaho gun shop] Red's loses its gun license
magicvalley.com/Times-News (Idaho) ^ | 3/14/07 | Cassidy Friedman

Posted on 03/16/2007 9:50:21 AM PDT by kiriath_jearim

TWIN FALLS - Red's Trading Post, one of Idaho's oldest gun shops, can trade no longer.

The U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has revoked the business's license to buy, trade or obtain guns after an ATF audit found Red's employees sold guns improperly numerous times between 1999 and 2004.

Red's manager, Ryan Horsley, admits when the business sold guns it sometimes left blank required parts of a gun purchase form, omitted a background check on a special order, failed to log multiple handgun sales to the same customer in five working days, did not keep track of guns returned to manufacturers, threw away denied applications dealers are required to keep for 20 years and failed to post a gun safety sign and pamphlets.

The ATF revoked Red's license March 5, shutting down 90 percent of the income that has sustained the store through three generations of Horsleys.

"They are taking very minor things and blowing them out of proportion," said Terry Horsley, the shop's owner and Ryan's mother.

The shop, at 215 Shoshone St. South, can sell the 1,000 guns remaining in its inventory, and can continue selling gun accessories and ammunition.

But accessories account for only 10 percent of its revenue.

"I'm just sitting here going, 'What am I going to do?,'" Ryan Horsley said.

The five-year audit found violations over a period in which 10,000 guns were sold, Horsley said.

"Mistakes happen. Stuff happens," Horsley said. "I think it's unreal expecting to have 100 percent non errors."

The bad news, which comes on the heels of record profits, could now close the store, Terry Horsley said.

Red's has paid $20,000 in legal fees protesting the ATF's decision. On Feb. 23, Red's legal team filed a petition in federal court in Boise.

The judicial review will consider, among other things, whether Red's "willfully" violated the law.

"'Not willful' is one of their petitions," said Deborah Ferguson, assistant U.S. attorney, representing the ATF's industry operations. "'Willful has been defined by case law. I would expect the court to look at that legal authority."

Case law defines "willful," an essential component of the allegations, as "they knew of the regulations and did not abide by them," Ferguson said.

Ryan Horsley said Red's was found responsible of several violations in an earlier audit.

But he said the infractions are petty and do not justify a revoked license.

"There's no missing guns," he said. "There are errors but everyone has errors."

Walt Sinclair, a Boise co-counsel for Red's, said the errors were clerical, not intentional.

He said it's not the first time the ATF has revoked the license of a Twin Falls gun dealership.

"Blue Lakes Sporting Goods lost its license," Sinclair said. "They had been there forever. It was a family business. It was a real success story, but this type of petty, technical noncompliance caused them to end up going out of business."

The ATF has 60 days from Feb. 23 to respond Red's petition.

The ATF Seattle Field Office spokeswoman declined to comment on Red's case until after judicial review.

"If the individuals reapply, the facts from the revocation would be considered for any future licenses," said spokeswoman Julianne Marshall. "Industry Operations will consider their application. However, they have an interest for public safety. This license was revoked for a reason."

A judge may still overturn ATF's decision.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Idaho
KEYWORDS: banglist; jackboots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-158 next last
To: kiriath_jearim
I wonder how many forms and bureaucratic errors the geniuses at the BATFE have made over the years? Maybe THEIR license should be revoked!

Also, I'm not a dealer, but I'd like to consider how the following admissions MIGHT truthfully be reworded by someone who was not calculating to make the shop look incompetent, dangerous, and evil.

"Red's manager, Ryan Horsley, admits when the business sold guns it sometimes left blank required parts of a gun purchase form, omitted a background check on a special order, failed to log multiple handgun sales to the same customer in five working days, did not keep track of guns returned to manufacturers, threw away denied applications dealers are required to keep for 20 years and failed to post a gun safety sign and pamphlets."

Here's a scenario that might actually be true:
Red's manager, Ryan Horsley, admits when the business sold guns, a couple times over the years and tens of thousands of sales, an employee forgot to make sure the customer filled in his county of residence along with mailing address. Once, when a customer made a special order, a background check on the old customer who had passed many such checks done by the shop was forgotten, because the new employee who handled the pick-up thought that the check had been done when the order was placed and advance payment made. Another time, all the proper background checks were done for a good customer who bought more than 5 pistols for his collection, but the clerk forgot the extra form that has to be filed when more than 5 are bought in a short period. Some unsold guns were returned to the manufacturer, to keep defective guns off the street, but they needed to look through shipping records to see which ones they sent back when their inventory did not agree at the end of the year. Also, an employee thinking that they were like the other applications forms accidentally threw away denied application forms. The shop didn't have all the latest ATF brochures and pamphlet in their shop for everyone to ignore.
61 posted on 03/16/2007 11:22:53 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0
Like it or not, the government decided that only people actually operating a business would be elligible for a Federal Firearms dealers license from that point on. Your other examples are apples and oranges as the feds do not regulate Mary Kay cosmetics and vacuum cleaer salesmen. You and I can disagree with the current gun laws and that decision by the BATF to limit FFL's to actual businesses, but none the less, they are laws.

Look, if you were to hand me a petition that says, "Should 99% of existing gun laws be abolished?", I'd sign it. But the current laws are reality and it is more rare than some would like to believe that the BATF is revoking a dealer's license over mere technicalities.
62 posted on 03/16/2007 11:23:51 AM PDT by NorthFlaRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT
The more the ATF does the more I pray to see the total destruction of this Jack booted THUG organization.

Burn All Toddlers First

63 posted on 03/16/2007 11:25:09 AM PDT by Charlespg (Peace= When we trod the ruins of Mecca and Medina under our infidel boots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Nice mouth! you kiss your mamma with that filthy thing?

And just what does the "effed", in your post "Sounds like Ryan Effed up" mean?

Advice for your life mylife:

It is better to have people THINK you're an idiot, than to open your mouth (or type some words) and remove all doubt.

64 posted on 03/16/2007 11:25:30 AM PDT by DocH (Gun-grabbers, you can HAVE my guns... lead first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
See Article 8 of the US Constitution, "The Congress shall have the power to... regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;"

Ah yes, the Commerce Clause. I thought that might be what you had in mind.

Since the 1930s, the Commerce Clause has been a favorite of Democrats and Leftists in this country. They have used it to justify the expansion of the power and reach of the Federal government into all areas of life.

Setting aside the question of whether the gun store owner was engaged in "interstate commerce", do you see any limit on power of Congress under the Commerce Clause?

65 posted on 03/16/2007 11:26:26 AM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: DocH

Knock off the big bad guy act


66 posted on 03/16/2007 11:28:24 AM PDT by mylife (The Roar of the Masses Could be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Look at comments 2 and 3.

As long as Americans are stupid enough to allow these jack-booted thugs to infringe a basic constitutional and human right over governmental trivia, our rights will continue to be eroded.

Muchas Gracias Senior Gonzales!!! I hope the Dems fry your butt!!!


67 posted on 03/16/2007 11:31:11 AM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tcostell

Sig Hile, What you don’t understand is that is the way the Feds will take away our rights. You can own a gun, you just will not be able to buy one ANYWHERE. This is happening ALL over. The Feds are busting gun dealers on minor infractions. If you can’t ban guns outright you just make it too difficult to purchase one. So what will happen is that guns will disappear though attrition.


68 posted on 03/16/2007 11:34:15 AM PDT by Exton1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DocH
They should NOT be held accountable, especially to the point of LOSING their business, for mere TECHNICAL infractions, of highly convoluted government-mandated red-tape, committed by their employees.

The employees ARE the business. Your logic is odd, to say the least. That's like saying "Publix" should not be fined for OSHA violations because the employees committed the violations or that "Mike's Bar" shouldn't lose its liquor license because Sam the bartender or Sally the waitress served underage patrons.

Also, I don't find throwing away denied applications and not performing background checks to be technical infractions caused by "highly convoluted government- mandated red tape". These two regulations are pretty much the the most important ones.
69 posted on 03/16/2007 11:34:16 AM PDT by NorthFlaRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: NorthFlaRebel
You have any proof for your claim that there has been a 90% reduction in gun dealers in the past 15 years?

Below. A large number of these licenses were individuals selling an occasional gun from home or at shows, not commercial enterprises.

IF this guy was omitting background checks for "special" cases, and not reporting multiple handgun sales, I'm glad there's one less. These are the abuses that lead to more regulation.

----------------

http://www.vpc.org/press/0603dealers.htm
 
Number of Gun Dealers in U.S. Drops Almost 80 Percent—From 245,628 to 54,902—Since 1994, New Violence Policy Center (VPC) Report Reveals

America Once Had More Gun Dealers Than Gas Stations, Now Only Five States Do: Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Wyoming

WASHINGTON, DC—The number of gun dealers in America has dropped by 190,726 since 1994 according to a new study released today by the Violence Policy Center (VPC). The study (see http://www.vpc.org/studies/dealers.pdf) found that the number of Type 1 Federal Firearms Licenses (FFLs) plummeted 78 percent: from 245,628 in 1994 to 54,902 in 2005. (The Type 1 FFL is the basic federal license required to sell guns in America.)

The 1992 VPC publication More Gun Dealers Than Gas Stations first focused national attention on abuses by FFL holders and revealed that at the time of its release the number of Americans who possessed the Type 1 FFL outnumbered gas stations 245,000 to 210,000. The bulk of the licenses were held by illegitimate "kitchen-table" dealers who operated out of their homes or offices, an unknown percentage of which were actively involved in criminal gun trafficking. As the result of policy recommendations contained in the study that were implemented under the Clinton Administration, today only five states have more gun dealers than gas stations (see chart below). The full study contains information for all 50 states as well as policy recommendations.

State Number of Gun Dealers Number of Gas Stations State Number of Gun Dealers Number of Gas Stations
Alaska 844 229 Oregon 1,479 1,146
Idaho 682 663 Wyoming 550 401
Montana 1,017 597 U.S. Total 54,902 121,363

California posted the largest decrease in the number of gun dealers of any state in the nation, dropping from 20,148 in 1994 to 2,438 in 2005—a drop of 88 percent.

VPC Policy Analyst Marty Langley states, "The sharp drop in gun dealers is one of the most important—and little noticed—victories in the effort to reduce firearms violence in America. The dramatic drop in dealers aids not only federal law enforcement, but cities and states as they continue their efforts to reduce illegal firearms trafficking and firearms violence."

70 posted on 03/16/2007 11:34:59 AM PDT by SJackson (Muslim women...no lesser role than men in war of liberation...they manufacture men, Hamas Charter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Charlespg

"Burn All Toddlers First"

Sure seems that way.


71 posted on 03/16/2007 11:35:20 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (Duncan Hunter in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Always eager to take the ATF's side, eh? Do you think this guy was arming terrorists and bank robbers?


72 posted on 03/16/2007 11:37:31 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Sounds to me like this guy needed to lose his dealer's license if he in fact violated all of these federal regulations and laws.

The federal regulations and laws are the violations. The language "shall not be infringed" is very clear in the Second Amendment.
73 posted on 03/16/2007 11:39:59 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

<!-- .style1 {font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif} .style11 {font-size: 10px} .style14 { font-size: x-large; font-weight: bold; } .style18 {font-size: 12} .style19 {font-size: 12px} .style20 {font-weight: bold} -->

How to Help
Latest News
Links

Red's Trading Post is currently under fire from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). On March 5th our license to aquire firearms was revoked and is pending appeal in federal court. In the meantime we are still able to continue selling as we always have.
    A 2004 audit by the ATF claims to have uncovered several minor clerical errors. Out of nearly10,000 firearms transfered between 1996 and 2004, the alleged error rate found was not even a full percentage point. There were no missing firearms, and no willfull illegal acts.
     This is not just happening to us though and is becoming a common trend throughout the United States; the problem is with the ATF's liberal interpretation of the word “willful”. The word “willful” was added by Ronald Reagan and Congress to protect FFL (Federal Firearms License) dealers against the ATF. Why would we honestly put our license, reputation and over 70 years in business in Jeopardy? We would never condone of illegal activity, we have always gone above and beyond what is asked of us and will continue to do so. Our family takes pride in our business and community. We will continue to fight this and received a lot of phone calls and e-mails from other dealers that are battling the same situation. The number of FFL's in this country are on a sharp decline. I thank our friends, supporters and customers for their continued support and assure everyone that we will continue to fight this.

Press

Times News
Contact Your Congressman KMVT

http://www.house.gov/

http://www.senate.gov/
More Coming soon

We'd like to point out a few of the ATF's more shining Moments.

Current Status
ATF Erred At Gun Shows


The Wounds of Waco
Fatal Raid in Arkansas
Store owner killed in raid
ATF Raids Museum
3-13-07 Federal Injunction Filed
 
 
 
  See more at
  atfabuse.com
 
 




 

HomeAbout UsOnline AuctionsFirearms ManufacturersLinksContact Us

©2002 • Red's Trading Post Inc.
215 Shoshone St. S. · Twin Falls, ID. 83301
Phone: 208.733.3546 · Fax: 208.734.2793
o
StatCounter - Free Web Tracker and Counter

  Contact Us Links to Our Friends' web sites Firearms Manufactures we currently carry in our store. Hard to Find Items currently in our store. About Red's Trading Post

74 posted on 03/16/2007 11:47:29 AM PDT by SJackson (Muslim women...no lesser role than men in war of liberation...they manufacture men, Hamas Charter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Logophile
"Since the 1930s, the Commerce Clause has been a favorite of Democrats and Leftists in this country. They have used it to justify the expansion of the power and reach of the Federal government into all areas of life."

Explain how the paperwork involved is onerous, and leftist.

"Setting aside the question of whether the gun store owner was engaged in "interstate commerce", do you see any limit on power of Congress under the Commerce Clause?"

There is no limit given in the Constitution. The founder's assumed commerce would be regulated to flourish, not regulated out of existence, so no limit was given. As Franklin said at the closing of the Convention, that the Constitution wasn't perfect, it was left up to the future what folks would make of it.

75 posted on 03/16/2007 11:49:40 AM PDT by spunkets ("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
"Once, when a customer made a special order, a background check on the old customer who had passed many such checks done by the shop was forgotten, because the new employee who handled the pick-up thought"

There's a box on the form to be filled in with the background check number. These forms are simple.

"an employee forgot to make sure the customer filled in his county of residence along with mailing address."

The employee should go over the form, to make sure it's filled out right. Horsley should have checked that the forms were also. It's not as if he had to count thousands of grains of sand every night.

76 posted on 03/16/2007 11:58:27 AM PDT by spunkets ("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

A BTT and many thanks. Signed and bumped.


77 posted on 03/16/2007 11:59:11 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
The founder's assumed commerce would be regulated to flourish, not regulated out of existence...

In case you aren't keeping score, mark Red's in the "out of existence" column.

Anytime a bureaucrat is given the kinds of power the BATFE has, it will be abused. Red's is just one in a long line of dealers being rail-roaded out of the industry by crap like this.

78 posted on 03/16/2007 12:02:19 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
"Anytime a bureaucrat is given the kinds of power the BATFE has, it will be abused. Red's is just one in a long line of dealers being rail-roaded out of the industry by crap like this."

I don't think he's being railroaded out of existence. I think Horsley was unreasonable and sloppy at least. He already had at least one warning, which should have woke him up. It didn't and his op continued to be sloppy.

from the article: "Ryan Horsley said Red's was found responsible of several violations in an earlier audit."

The dealers I know don't have these problems, even one with filing system, that amounted to storing their forms at the point in the store where they were filled out and dropped right there, then later fell into a box, into a corner, or stuck to the bottom of a sandwich wrapper. The sales volume, was on the order of this guy's.

79 posted on 03/16/2007 12:15:11 PM PDT by spunkets ("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
I think Horsley was unreasonable and sloppy at least.

6-7 errors out of 10000? Doesn't sound sloppy to me. If government kept track of our tax money like that, we'd be a lot better off...

Considering most of these arbitrary BATFE infringements shouldn't even exist, don't be too happy about this guys business going down the tubes.

80 posted on 03/16/2007 12:26:37 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson