Posted on 03/16/2007 5:55:58 AM PDT by Mo1
Edited on 03/16/2007 5:57:55 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
ON CAPITOL HILL Valerie Wilson Testifies
Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) chairs a House Oversight and Government Reform Ctme. hearing on the disclosure of CIA Agent Valerie Plame Wilson's identity. The hearing will look into whether White House officials followed appropriate procedures for safeguarding the identity of Ms. Wilson.
FRIDAY, C-SPAN AT 10AM ET
Considering the latter's connection w/ the UN and the UN's connection with the former, what's the difference?
So isn't the CIA guy - Grenier - most at fault here then? He discussed her name with the WH and he allowed Novak to go ahead with his article -- all without ever warning anyone about her alleged "covert" status.
One thing I'll say for Waxman, he does offer the perfect face of the RAT party...... every time I see that ugly mug I think of rabid rats scurrying around underground.
Hey there ..
Just back from St. Paddy's Day breakfast .. has Natasha been on yet?
"That, and the fact that she broke her super-duper top secret "cover" to him on one of their initial dates..... did she promptly report to here superiors the fact that SHE had compromised her super-secret identity with a married man with whom she was having an affair?"
Yes, that too would probably get her bounced from the Agency.
But weirdly enough it isn't against the IIPA, which allows officers to "out" themselves.
Naturally. A Dem was impeached, ergo it's necessary to impeach a Rep.
In the dreaded private sector, a manager can order an employee to seek assistance from Employee Assistance Programs. It is too bad that Waxman et al. do need get the emotional assistance that they need so desperately.
I will have to hold off on reading what Siggy and Dr. Sanity have to say until I get home.
LOL.....you see, that's where my mistake was: I was looking at this more as a break, as opposed to an INTERMISSION.
:-)
Can we get a transcript of this blonde idiot's testimony?
Old timers will recall that Waxman was a young member of the committee that voted to impeach President Nixon. I have a feeling I know how this show turns out.
PLEASE STOP!!!
This is a live thread.
It really PO's me that someone who is getting off on all this can sit there and pretend it all is so awful. Meanwhile she let her scum president lie on national tv while she posed in "spy" photos for Vanity Fair.
Give it a rest.
And I quote you from another thread on another matter...."Please provide some evidence of this." That is a serious allegation
"That is correct. The whole point of the legislation was to go after people like Agee -- and the people at "Covert Weekly" (or whatever it was called)..."
Now I remember. It was "Covert Action Quarterly."
And the Democrats screamed bloody murder when the IIPA was passed.
Bwhahaha
(caffeine withdrawal)
It is too bad that Waxman et al. don't get the emotional assistance that they need so desperately.
There, fixed it.
LOL
What channel are you watching? C-Span doesn't do commercials.
She was probably what the Russians called a "Swallow." And it ain't got nothin' to do with birds!
It's political theater, nothing more. Look at in those terms.
In Act I, we are introduced to our "heroine" who is given ample opportunity to establish her character and backstory.
Act II will start to establish conflict -- adversarial opinions that will put our "heroine" to the test. The "heroine", in absentia, will be defended by her allies ('rat Congresscritters).
Then, I'm sure, the inevitable Act III, where the "heroine" makes her triumphant return to "slay the dragon" that her allies have weakened for her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.