Posted on 03/15/2007 5:18:19 PM PDT by Jean S
For discussion.
I suspect you may be right. But don't paint all of us FReepers as Rudybots, that when given the choice between McCain or Rudy, we say Rudy. Obviously many of us will be working our tails off to make sure that is not the actual choices come primary time. If a better candidate gains some traction I know I will be pounding the pavement, banging on doors and manning phone banks to make sure neither Rudy nor McCain even sniff the nomination.
Gee, what depressing, pessimistic poll. The thought of a conservative not running for the GOP Presidential nomination is unthinkable. But, under such a circumstance, I'd write-in a candidate and then wait for a conservative to run as a third-party candidate in the general election.
Hey we're anti-RINO FReepers. Get it right. If Rudy was a real conservative he would be embraced like Reagan reincarnated.
Unfortunately, RINO's are a dime a dozen.
"FR's latest poll - Giuliani vs McCain - How did you vote?"
None of the above.
"I see we're up to about 50% Rudybots on FreeRepublic now."
Only when the only other name in the poll is equally repellant.
Nothing is worse than eight years of a RINO and/or Democrat in the White House. That is nuclear winter scenerio for conservatives.
Hillary against either one of these jackasses would open the door for a prominent conservative to run and win as a third-party candidate.
So, if Stalin was running as a Republican, promised to protect the nation from terrorism and was a little more conservative than Hitler, who was running as a Democrat, you'd vote for Stalin, too?
Write in Bullwinkle...
It's quite easy to see they post more about Hillary than any other candidate.
In the short term Hillary would be a disaster. In the long term giving the RINOs a pass is worse.
" Staying home or going third party IS BAAAAAD! "
I AGREE !!!!!
people staying home or voting third party might as well just vote for dem ...AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH
And, so are CINO's.
How can we know, other than to this word for it, which is worhtless considering he has a man devoid of character and a moral compass?
And, he supports or has supported the following:
Gun-control laws
The idea of man-made global warming
Guest worker programs for illegals while criticizing Bill Clinton for signing immigration laws that were too tough
Taxpayer-funded abortion while donating money to pro-abortion groups like NARAL
Hate crime legislation
The appointment of leftist judges as mayor of New York, including one that mandated taxpayers shell out $20,000 for sex change operation
The homosexual agenda (he marched in every single gay pride parades in New York, even in one including NAMBLA, and has even offered to cross-dress to raise money for militant homosexual groups
Not fair to use hypothetical boogeymen as strawman agrument against anothers reasoning. It's a poll for heaven's sake. A snapshot of only Freeper sentiments dealing with the here and now. Time and exploration sometimes have a way of changing what is true today into something totally false later. Calm down and work for the good.
This Hitlery or Giussolini business is tiresome... Julie-annie should just marry Mrs. Clinton, that way they would win for sure!
After all, he is just like Billy... except his prostate is toast and he is shooting blanks...
This Hitlery or Giussolini business is tiresome... Julie-annie should just marry Mrs. Clinton, that way they would win for sure!
After all, he is just like Billy... except his prostate is toast and he is shooting blanks...
I'll write in Duncan Hunter....
What a vile post - but, for you, typical.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.