Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FR's latest poll - Giuliani vs McCain - How did you vote?
FR ^ | 3/14/07 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 03/15/2007 5:18:19 PM PDT by Jean S

For discussion.


TOPICS: Free Republic; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: giuliani; mccain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-173 next last
To: madprof98
And now the Rudybots want to make the whole USA into the left coast, and they plan on using that early CA primary as their vehicle.

I suspect you may be right. But don't paint all of us FReepers as Rudybots, that when given the choice between McCain or Rudy, we say Rudy. Obviously many of us will be working our tails off to make sure that is not the actual choices come primary time. If a better candidate gains some traction I know I will be pounding the pavement, banging on doors and manning phone banks to make sure neither Rudy nor McCain even sniff the nomination.

121 posted on 03/15/2007 7:09:51 PM PDT by Kudsman (Gramsci = Hillary = Bye Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Gee, what depressing, pessimistic poll. The thought of a conservative not running for the GOP Presidential nomination is unthinkable. But, under such a circumstance, I'd write-in a candidate and then wait for a conservative to run as a third-party candidate in the general election.


122 posted on 03/15/2007 7:10:47 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: somemoreequalthanothers

Hey we're anti-RINO FReepers. Get it right. If Rudy was a real conservative he would be embraced like Reagan reincarnated.

Unfortunately, RINO's are a dime a dozen.


123 posted on 03/15/2007 7:11:19 PM PDT by proudpapa (Forget Rudy McRomney it's Duncan Hunter in '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

"FR's latest poll - Giuliani vs McCain - How did you vote?"


None of the above.


124 posted on 03/15/2007 7:11:50 PM PDT by Grunthor (Voting for a candidate that actually SUPPORTS the partys' platform!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

"I see we're up to about 50% Rudybots on FreeRepublic now."


Only when the only other name in the poll is equally repellant.


125 posted on 03/15/2007 7:14:34 PM PDT by Grunthor (Voting for a candidate that actually SUPPORTS the partys' platform!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: joyce11111
Staying home or going third party IS BAAAAAD!

Nothing is worse than eight years of a RINO and/or Democrat in the White House. That is nuclear winter scenerio for conservatives.

Hillary against either one of these jackasses would open the door for a prominent conservative to run and win as a third-party candidate.

126 posted on 03/15/2007 7:14:50 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: marron
But I do trust him on war issues, and the war is my bottom line.

So, if Stalin was running as a Republican, promised to protect the nation from terrorism and was a little more conservative than Hitler, who was running as a Democrat, you'd vote for Stalin, too?

127 posted on 03/15/2007 7:16:22 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Write in Bullwinkle...


128 posted on 03/15/2007 7:17:16 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LtdGovt

It's quite easy to see they post more about Hillary than any other candidate.


129 posted on 03/15/2007 7:20:09 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

In the short term Hillary would be a disaster. In the long term giving the RINOs a pass is worse.


130 posted on 03/15/2007 7:20:25 PM PDT by Sunnyflorida ((Elections Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joyce11111

" Staying home or going third party IS BAAAAAD! "

I AGREE !!!!!

people staying home or voting third party might as well just vote for dem ...AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH


131 posted on 03/15/2007 7:20:52 PM PDT by mike_9958
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa

And, so are CINO's.


132 posted on 03/15/2007 7:21:25 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: LtdGovt
Then you might need a pair of glasses. Rudy supports the WOT, limited government, tax cuts, deregulation, and other important Republican principles.

How can we know, other than to this word for it, which is worhtless considering he has a man devoid of character and a moral compass?

And, he supports or has supported the following:

Gun-control laws

The idea of man-made global warming

Guest worker programs for illegals while criticizing Bill Clinton for signing immigration laws that were too tough

Taxpayer-funded abortion while donating money to pro-abortion groups like NARAL

Hate crime legislation

The appointment of leftist judges as mayor of New York, including one that mandated taxpayers shell out $20,000 for sex change operation

The homosexual agenda (he marched in every single gay pride parades in New York, even in one including NAMBLA, and has even offered to cross-dress to raise money for militant homosexual groups

133 posted on 03/15/2007 7:21:30 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

Not fair to use hypothetical boogeymen as strawman agrument against anothers reasoning. It's a poll for heaven's sake. A snapshot of only Freeper sentiments dealing with the here and now. Time and exploration sometimes have a way of changing what is true today into something totally false later. Calm down and work for the good.


134 posted on 03/15/2007 7:24:28 PM PDT by Kudsman (Gramsci = Hillary = Bye Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
So, if Stalin was running as a Republican, promised to protect the nation from terrorism and was a little more conservative than Hitler, who was running as a Democrat, you'd vote for Stalin, too?

This Hitlery or Giussolini business is tiresome... Julie-annie should just marry Mrs. Clinton, that way they would win for sure!

After all, he is just like Billy... except his prostate is toast and he is shooting blanks...

135 posted on 03/15/2007 7:24:32 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: mike_9958

This Hitlery or Giussolini business is tiresome... Julie-annie should just marry Mrs. Clinton, that way they would win for sure!

After all, he is just like Billy... except his prostate is toast and he is shooting blanks...


136 posted on 03/15/2007 7:26:00 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

I'll write in Duncan Hunter....


137 posted on 03/15/2007 7:26:11 PM PDT by pattty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
How can we know, other than to this word for it, which is worhtless considering he has a man devoid of character and a moral compass?

You're one to talk about a moral compass, when you make the most despicable allegations about someone like Rudy? You might think that it is normal to associate someone you don't like with NAMBLA, but normal people don't agree.
138 posted on 03/15/2007 7:26:23 PM PDT by LtdGovt ("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
his prostate is toast and he is shooting blanks...

What a vile post - but, for you, typical.

139 posted on 03/15/2007 7:31:09 PM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Sunnyflorida
"In the short term Hillary would be a disaster. In the long term giving the RINOs a pass is worse. "

Your going to have to explain that... I have no love for RINOs but...

Thanks to the folks in the 90's who voted for Perot instead of Bush 41 or Dole we got Clinton for 8 years. And one could surmise that we got 911, a war in Iraq, North Korean nukes, and China testing satelite killing missles because of it. Domestically we got high taxes, tech bubbles, goverment corruption and corporate scandals (Enrons). Unfortunately people have short memories and do not understand the long term of effect of those bad decisions.
140 posted on 03/15/2007 7:34:01 PM PDT by mike_9958
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-173 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson