Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: nypokerface
To: nypokerface; All; MoochPooch; Michael81Dus; Vicomte13; az_gila
A new pinglist, so if you're interested....
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3f/Berlin-Gedaechtniskirche_1989_asb_1142_Nacht_1_small.jpg) |
pan-Europe pinglist.* This pinglist covers a broad range of topics relating to Europe: culture, current events, politics, science, history, arts, etc. Warning: This could be a high volume pinglist. Note: This pinglist covers--but not as much--Eastern Europe. There is already a moderate volume pinglist for that region. Ping if you see a pertinent thread. |
*To get on or off this list, freepmail with the subjects or . No message is necessary. To get on or get off this pinglist, freepmail here, with the appropriate subject.
|
There is also a:
John 3:16 (New King James Version): "16 For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life." |
This pinglist can terminate at any time, without notice.
|
3 posted on
03/15/2007 11:47:16 AM PDT by
Jedi Master Pikachu
( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
To: nypokerface
Everyone knows the Journal is a Republican propaganda machine, a mouthpiece for all that is evil. I wonder which Big Oil payroll he's getting his payola from? /s
4 posted on
03/15/2007 11:47:28 AM PDT by
jimmyray
To: nypokerface
So a bunch of egghead professors thinks they knows more about climate than Al Gore?
5 posted on
03/15/2007 11:47:50 AM PDT by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(When I search out the massed wheeling circles of the stars, my feet no longer touch the earth)
To: nypokerface; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; Ole Okie; ...
![](http://lledgerock.com/pogw.jpg)
![](http://lrllamas.com/junkscience_logo.png)
Heretic!! Burn the Witch! (sarc)
6 posted on
03/15/2007 11:48:00 AM PDT by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: nypokerface
Much warmer this morning: -19
7 posted on
03/15/2007 11:48:54 AM PDT by
RightWhale
(300 miles north of Big Wild Life)
To: nypokerface
Much warmer this morning: -19
8 posted on
03/15/2007 11:48:58 AM PDT by
RightWhale
(300 miles north of Big Wild Life)
To: nypokerface
Please make sure to post his obituary next week. Those GW fundamentalists don't take kindly to heresy.
9 posted on
03/15/2007 11:50:09 AM PDT by
freedomfiter2
(Duncan Hunter: pro-life, pro-2nd Amendment, pro-border control, pro-family)
To: nypokerface
He says the currently used method of determining the global temperature -- and any conclusion drawn from it -- is more political than scientific. Agreed. And also consider that CO2 only comprises 0.036% (1/3 of 1%) of the atmosphere and that has not even doubled. How can something less than 2/3rds of 1% drive the climate to this "horrific" destruction that Al Gore is claiming that is only 10 years away!?
10 posted on
03/15/2007 11:50:34 AM PDT by
avacado
To: nypokerface
To: nypokerface
Dead man walking.
He'll spend the rest of his life hiding in the basement now.
12 posted on
03/15/2007 11:52:20 AM PDT by
El Sordo
To: nypokerface
A Danish scientist said the idea of a "global temperature" and global warming is more political than scientific.The Global Warming Syndicate will fine him 50,000 carbon credits for such a heretical statement.
13 posted on
03/15/2007 11:53:40 AM PDT by
ConservaTexan
(February 6, 1911)
To: nypokerface
The argument is presented in the Journal of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics.
---
Oh come on now. Look at the title of this publication - Thermodynamics??? Why cite this when you can cite 'An Inconvenient Truth'. Thermodynamics versus Truth??? Written study versus celluloid?? Scientist versus Oscar winner?? This is America. Hollywood is always right!
To: nypokerface
In other words....you guys left my lab off the "grant money" list so i can research your "support"......
16 posted on
03/15/2007 11:58:04 AM PDT by
mo
To: nypokerface
17 posted on
03/15/2007 11:58:26 AM PDT by
dubie
To: nypokerface
I saw this all over the newspapers. It was on every news outlet on TV as well with 24 hour coverage. I couldn't believe they were actually reporting and giving a fair say to something that contradicted their agenda.
Then I woke up. (it was a dream)
19 posted on
03/15/2007 12:01:28 PM PDT by
HOTTIEBOY
(The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
To: nypokerface
I watched a two-hour movie on the net yesterday. It was made in England and strongly condemned the GW myth and debunked it thoroughly. I did not see the link to the film, but just look up GW films and it should be easy to find. It was not on UTube, but another film site. Don't miss it! GW is a huge leftist political ploy and is a dangerous as such and as a new religion with St. Gore leading the attack.
To: nypokerface
What sheer Hubris of Humanity that we think our puny enterprises can disrupt an entire planet; man-made changes in LOCAL microclimates perhaps but maybe that's a result of increasing URBANIZATION which also occured as a consequence of the industrial revolution and not anything to do with 'eeeeevil' fossil fuel use that the 'green' activists WANT to blame it on.
As for GLOBAL climate; variances in insolation are well known to occur periodically why assume Man is 'guilty' of what even small changes in the Sun can much more easily affect?
There is an anti-West, anti-industrial anti-Progress anti-human POLITICAL agenda at work in this 'debate' and it STINKS imo..
21 posted on
03/15/2007 12:04:40 PM PDT by
FYREDEUS
(FYREDEUS)
To: nypokerface
differences of temperatures drive the processes and create the storms, sea currents, thunder, etc. which make up the climate".
I do believe this is the very first time I have seen this fact reported. Climate is dynamic!!!!! who knew? /s
Reported by very un-right-wing UPI and the sources are Danish and Canadian. No Americans, probably no oil company money and I bet they don't care about grants!
28 posted on
03/15/2007 12:13:57 PM PDT by
reformedliberal
(If the troops are mostly home by November 2008, how will the Dems disenfranchise them, this time?)
To: nypokerface
Not so much a myth as it is a lie.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson