Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Black caucus questions Cherokee vote(catfight)
Yahoooo ^ | 3/13/07 | BEN EVANS ap

Posted on 03/13/2007 5:26:11 PM PDT by mdittmar

WASHINGTON - Black leaders in Congress asked the federal government Tuesday to weigh in on the legality of a vote by the Cherokee Nation earlier this month to revoke citizenship from descendants of former tribal slaves.

Saying they were "shocked and outraged," more than two dozen members of the Congressional Black Caucus signed a letter to the Interior Department's Bureau of Indian Affairs questioning the "validity, legality, as well as the morality" of the March 3 vote.

"The black descendant Cherokees can trace their Native American heritage back in many cases for more than a century," said Rep. Diane Watson (news, bio, voting record), D-Calif. "They are legally a part of the Cherokee Nation through history, precedent, blood and treaty obligations."

Watson emphasized that the federal government spends billions of dollars a year on Native American programs, including for the Cherokee.

In the special election, more than 76 percent of those casting ballots voted to amend the tribal constitution to limit citizenship to descendants of "by blood" tribe members and remove an estimated 2,800 freedmen descendants.

The vote followed a March 2006 ruling by the Cherokee Nation Supreme Court that said an 1866 treaty assured tribal citizenship to freedmen descendants.

Descendants tried to stop the ballot measure in court but were denied. They have vowed to continue fighting.

Cherokee officials have said the vote is a matter of self-government and the tribe's sovereign right to determine its membership. Critics have called it racist.

Mike Miller, a spokesman for the tribe, could not immediately be reached for comment Tuesday night.

Along with Watson, Congressional Black Caucus Chairwoman Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick, D-Mich., civil rights movement veteran John Lewis (news, bio, voting record), D-Ga., and House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (news, bio, voting record), D-Mich., were among 26 lawmakers to sign the letter.

They asked for a legal interpretation of the vote and requested possibilities for government recourse.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: bia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
I'm a victim
No I'm a victim
I'm a bigger victim,I was here first
You made me come here,that makes me the bigger victim

blah,blah,blah.;)

1 posted on 03/13/2007 5:26:14 PM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Caucus Chairwoman Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick

Say that 3 times fast. lol
2 posted on 03/13/2007 5:29:06 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
In the special election, more than 76 percent of those casting ballots voted to amend the tribal constitution to limit citizenship to descendants of "by blood" tribe members and remove an estimated 2,800 freedmen descendants. The vote followed a March 2006 ruling by the Cherokee Nation Supreme Court that said an 1866 treaty assured tribal citizenship to freedmen descendants. Descendants tried to stop the ballot measure in court but were denied. They have vowed to continue fighting. Cherokee officials have said the vote is a matter of self-government and the tribe's sovereign right to determine its membership.

This is an internal Cherokee matter. The United States should stay out of it.

3 posted on 03/13/2007 5:30:46 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (Waiting for Samson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
"They are legally a part of the Cherokee Nation through history, precedent, blood and treaty obligations."

The vote pertained to Freedmen who are not Cherokee by blood, as far as what I've read would indicate.

4 posted on 03/13/2007 5:32:04 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Ooooh, this should be interesting!


5 posted on 03/13/2007 5:33:11 PM PDT by LongElegantLegs (...a urethral syringe used to treat syphilis with mercury.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Now that the Cherokee nation is making heap big wampum from casinos, they want to tidy up the rolls. Those dropped will no longer be in line for the considerable largesse.

IT'S THE MONEY!!!!


6 posted on 03/13/2007 5:38:04 PM PDT by Stand W (Fetchez La Vache!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

injuns had slaves?


7 posted on 03/13/2007 5:38:25 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
 


8 posted on 03/13/2007 5:38:45 PM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken (Seldom right but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

Thunderdome.

Two minorities enter, one minority leaves.


9 posted on 03/13/2007 5:44:17 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

So the guys who pander to the tribes every time it's to their advantage want the administration to solve the problem so they don't have to be the bad guys. Hopefully, the administration's response will be, "Gee, we don't know, what do you guys want to do?"


10 posted on 03/13/2007 5:44:27 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Buffalo Soldiers strike again!

The Indigenous-Americans should stand up. REPARATIONS from the black community. The rape of these people can not stand!

11 posted on 03/13/2007 5:46:21 PM PDT by nctexan (Top 10 Presidential Reqs. for 2008 - see my homepage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Let's see now, the congressional black caucus refuses to let in anyone who isn't black. The Cherokees are revoking tribal citizenship of those who don't aren't Cherokee. Lewis, conyers and the rest are upset that blacks are being treated as they treat others?


12 posted on 03/13/2007 5:47:11 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Saying they were "shocked and outraged," more than two dozen members of the Congressional Black Caucus ...

When are they not "shocked and outraged" ?

Oh yeah, When William Jefferson, D-Louisiana, takes a bribe. They call that "the peoples' business."


13 posted on 03/13/2007 5:51:27 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (Waiting for Samson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

They can question it all they want but there is absolutely nothing they can do about it.


14 posted on 03/13/2007 5:51:36 PM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Auntie's Choice.

15 posted on 03/13/2007 5:51:55 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Some had slaves and some were slaves.


16 posted on 03/13/2007 5:53:20 PM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Maybe the Cherokee could offer the caucus Ward Churchill and a first round draft choice.


17 posted on 03/13/2007 5:53:59 PM PDT by Bernard (Immigration should be rare, safe and legal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, diein' time's here.


18 posted on 03/13/2007 5:59:44 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bernard

LOL!!!


19 posted on 03/13/2007 6:22:30 PM PDT by Atchafalaya (When you are there thats the best)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
"...more than two dozen members of the Congressional Black Caucus..."

"Cherokee officials have said the vote is a matter of self-government and the tribe's sovereign right to determine its membership. Critics have called it racist."


So....according to the CBC, it is "racist" for a group of people to pick and choose their membership ranks. Isn't that what the CBC has been doing for years?
Answer me this Mr. House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers. Will you allow any Caucasians to join your little racist group?
20 posted on 03/13/2007 6:42:15 PM PDT by hophead ("Enjoy Every Sandwich")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson