Skip to comments.
Attorney firings had genesis in White House (serving at the pleasure of the President)
MSNBC ^
| 3/13/2007
| Dan Eggen and John Solomon/WP
Posted on 03/13/2007 7:52:44 AM PDT by tobyhill
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
1
posted on
03/13/2007 7:52:49 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
To: Peach
2
posted on
03/13/2007 7:54:26 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: tobyhill
Strange... not a word of Clinton firing all 93 US Attorneys in 1993... /sarcasm
3
posted on
03/13/2007 7:55:19 AM PDT
by
pabianice
To: tobyhill
Yet another non-scandal.
4
posted on
03/13/2007 7:55:26 AM PDT
by
pnh102
To: HowardLSmith.ô¿ô; hoosiermama; darth; Liz; backhoe; Certified Horticulturist
5
posted on
03/13/2007 7:56:28 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: tobyhill
OMG!! Does this mean, gasp...that hirings have their genesis in the White House also??
6
posted on
03/13/2007 7:56:53 AM PDT
by
msnimje
(Jim Robinson founded FREE REPUBLIC. Jim Robinson hates McCain and Giuliani. 'Nuf said.)
To: pabianice
Why is not one Republican elected offical calling a press conference to remind 'the journalist' that Slick fired EVERY ONE OF THE US Attorneys in 1993!
Bush should have fired Patrick Fitzgerald......
hey in a slightly different vein did you hear about the 2 gay irishmen???
Patrick Fitzgerald and Gerald Fitzpatrick......
8
posted on
03/13/2007 7:57:32 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
To: tobyhill
9
posted on
03/13/2007 7:57:35 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: tobyhill
Lawmakers requested the documents as part of an investigation into whether the firings were politically motivated. While it is unclear whether the documents will answer Congress's questions, they show that the White House and other administration officials were more closely involved in the dismissals, and at a much earlier date, than they have previously acknowledged.Of course, no mention of the fact that the Clinton administration actually did fire the whole lot shortly after WJC took office.
To: pabianice
It's the media and Rats trying to create controversy where none exist because of their impotence with following through on their election Iraq promises and it's also why they're having hearing on the weirdo Plame and Wilson whatever.
11
posted on
03/13/2007 7:57:55 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: Just A Nobody
12
posted on
03/13/2007 7:58:47 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: tobyhill
I guess I would be doing some firing if a U.S. Attorney was not energetically pursuing complaints of voter-fraud. That is supposed to be a serious crime.
13
posted on
03/13/2007 7:59:22 AM PDT
by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: pabianice
Strange... not a word of Clinton firing all 93 US Attorneys in 1993... /sarcasm Chris Wallace mentioned it at the end of his Sunday show on FNC.
But only because someone had e-mailed him with the info. Wallace said he hadn't mentioned it before because he hadn't known about it.
Sigh.
14
posted on
03/13/2007 7:59:44 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
Of course it's political and that's why they serve at the pleasure of the President.
15
posted on
03/13/2007 8:01:12 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
Emphasis!
The dismissals took place after President Bush told Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales that he had received complaints that some prosecutors had not energetically pursued voter-fraud investigations, according to White House spokeswoman Dana Perino.
16
posted on
03/13/2007 8:01:14 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: tobyhill
Back in '93, a perfectly good Republican US Attorney was sacked and replaced with an alcoholic Democrat party hack. His wife finally gave up on him as uncurable. He was good enought for Hillary however. He would lick her feet in an alcoholic stupor and never know he had been had.
17
posted on
03/13/2007 8:01:39 AM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. N.P.)
To: tobyhill
Back in '93, a perfectly good Republican US Attorney was sacked and replaced with an alcoholic Democrat party hack. His wife finally gave up on him as uncurable. He was good enought for Hillary however. He would lick her feet in an alcoholic stupor and never know he had been had.
18
posted on
03/13/2007 8:01:48 AM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. N.P.)
To: tobyhill
This is a nothing story. How does thinking of firing all 92, two years ago, equate to firing 8 now? Hardly the same thing.
19
posted on
03/13/2007 8:01:58 AM PDT
by
Williams
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
20
posted on
03/13/2007 8:02:04 AM PDT
by
Michael.SF.
(In this (political) War, Republicans are gutless appeasers. -- Ann Coulter)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson