[pabianice]

Strange... not a word of Clinton firing all 93 US Attorneys in 1993... /sarcasm

[TexasCajun]

Why is not one Republican elected offical calling a press conference to remind 'the journalist' that Slick fired EVERY ONE OF THE US Attorneys in 1993!

[tobyhill]

It's the media and Rats trying to create controversy where none exist because of their impotence with following through on their election Iraq promises and it's also why they're having hearing on the weirdo Plame and Wilson whatever.

[mewzilla]

Strange... not a word of Clinton firing all 93 US Attorneys in 1993... /sarcasm

Chris Wallace mentioned it at the end of his Sunday show on FNC.

But only because someone had e-mailed him with the info. Wallace said he hadn't mentioned it before because he hadn't known about it.

Sigh.

[Non-Sequitur]

Strange... not a word of Clinton firing all 93 US Attorneys in 1993... /sarcasm

Maybe because Gonzales' own chief of staff says that he didn't? Link

It's unheard of for a sitting president at the beginning of his second term to fire all the U.S. Attorney's that he appointed in his first. In the past 25 years only 12 U.S. Attorney's have been fired in mid term, and 8 of those were from Bush. I don't dispute that these people serve at the pleasure of the president but I'm puzzled about why the need to scrap everyone Bush appointed and start fresh?