Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Juror calls on Bush to pardon Libby
MSNBC ^ | 08 March 2007

Posted on 03/07/2007 8:47:30 PM PST by Lorianne

WASHINGTON - Saying “I don’t want him to go to jail,” a member of the jury that convicted I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby of perjury and obstruction of justice in the CIA leak case called Wednesday for President Bush to pardon Vice President Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff.

The woman, Ann Redington, said in an interview on MSNBC’s “Hardball” that she cried when the verdicts against Libby were read Tuesday. She said Libby seemed to be “a really nice guy.”

Redington said “it was very difficult — it was hard” to vote to convict Libby, who was found guilty of four of five felony counts accusing him of lying to a federal grand jury and the FBI. Prosecutors said he hoped to derail a special prosecutor’s investigation of the leak of the identity of Valerie Plame, a covert CIA operative.

“He seemed like a ton of fun. ... I didn’t want to see him and his wife and say he was guilty of a crime,” Redington told MSNBC’s Chris Matthews. But she she said she had no choice given the evidence.

“I think he got caught in a difficult situation where he got caught in the initial lie, and it just snowballed,” she said.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: fitzfong; pardonscooter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
Unbelievable!
1 posted on 03/07/2007 8:47:31 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

What did she expect ?


2 posted on 03/07/2007 8:52:07 PM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Must be OJ Jury that convict Scooter

Actually one of juror told CNN Larry King he want see Karl Rove and Dick Cheney there than Scooter libby I am serious


3 posted on 03/07/2007 8:52:36 PM PST by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Dolts. Every citizen needs to know that jury nullification is a perfectly legitimate practice, indeed one of the reasons for the jury system: to allow the common sense of 12 ordinary citizens to trump juridical niceties and technicalities.


4 posted on 03/07/2007 8:52:37 PM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

I don't think he should go to jail but I'm gonna vote guilty anyways. Yeah! These guys make the first OJ jury look like a bunch of rocket scientists.


5 posted on 03/07/2007 8:52:57 PM PST by fkabuckeyesrule (Good News everyone!!!! It's baseball season!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fkabuckeyesrule

Maybe the judge will give him probation just to avoid the appeal.


6 posted on 03/07/2007 8:53:36 PM PST by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

I am amazed...if she believed this then how could she have voted him guildty?


7 posted on 03/07/2007 8:55:18 PM PST by flixxx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
she had no choice given the evidence.

Apparently she has never heard of juror nullification, she had her chance and blew it, to Louis's detriment.

(I just can't call a grown man "scooter")

8 posted on 03/07/2007 8:55:39 PM PST by Not now, Not ever! (The devil made me do it!,.......................................................( well, not really.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

I noticed the Scooter Libby story on the top fold front page of our local paper and I wondered... Did Bill Clinton's Obstruction of Justice and Subjourning Perjury story ever make it to the front page...nahhh


9 posted on 03/07/2007 8:59:30 PM PST by Paloma_55 (I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55

and what about Sandy Burglar?


10 posted on 03/07/2007 9:03:39 PM PST by Robert Lomax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Robert Lomax

Is Bush going to pardon the two border patrol agents too? I hope so.


11 posted on 03/07/2007 9:08:22 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine
Actually one of juror told CNN Larry King he want see Karl Rove and Dick Cheney there than Scooter libby I am serious

That was the former Bob Woodward staff WaPo writer and DC neighbor of Tim Russert's. How the defense ever let him on the jury is beyond me.

12 posted on 03/07/2007 9:09:13 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Who told her she had no choice? She can always vote her conscience.

The law is the jury and juries are not subject to anything but their own sense of fairness. Otherwise, why have juries?

Why does our legal system include juries if they cannot decide for themselves what is justice.

I'll tell you why we have juries today. We have them so that judges and their courts can deflect responsibility. In this case the judge blinded the jury to the context of the charges. He would not allow them to know there was no underlying crime, that it was all politically motivated. He led the jurors by the nose to the result he wanted them to decide.

And I would wager there was a juror that made it seem there was only one choice, that no one could vote differently. That's why this juror said she had 'no choice'.
13 posted on 03/07/2007 9:10:18 PM PST by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Unbelievable!
-----
Well, well, even the "engineered" jury in this kangaroo court cannot stand their guilt in this travesty of justice.


14 posted on 03/07/2007 9:11:06 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Pardon me, but she should have voted "not guilty".


15 posted on 03/07/2007 9:12:10 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

they answered that question today...they has run out of challenges allowed and had to take him...


16 posted on 03/07/2007 9:13:12 PM PST by 3D-JOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

no kidding. He's been a disappointment. I now am beginning to believe that the only difference between Bill and George is this....Bill Clinton is like a TV evangelist and there are those who will drink the bs like Jim Jones koolaide. And George, well, he's like that kid in high school who's dad paid for the fancy uniforms. Everyone who loves the team knows he has no talent but they like the uniforms so they don't say squat because that would be disloyal to the team.


17 posted on 03/07/2007 9:19:17 PM PST by Robert Lomax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Note the conversation reported by Drudge (bold text mine):

MSNBC host Chris Matthews spoke with Libby juror Ann Redington on HARDBALL. Juror [#10] says she would support a Bush pardon for Libby.

Transcript:

Chris: You're for a pardon out of sympathy for the defendant.

Ann: Yeah, I think in the big picture, um, it kind of bothers me that there was this whole big crime being investigated and he got caught up in the investigation as opposed to in the actual crime that was supposedly committed.

Chris: Which is the leaking of a CIA agents name.

Ann: Exactly.

End

But wait, there was no "big crime" committed, remember?!?! Can these juror statements be used on appeal?

18 posted on 03/07/2007 9:39:38 PM PST by Tirian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

"Won't somebody please take responsibility for my actions? What is big government for anyway?"


19 posted on 03/07/2007 9:49:13 PM PST by TigersEye (For Democrats; victory in Iraq is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
How the defense ever let him on the jury is beyond me.

I heard on the radio that the defense had used all their challenges, and couldn't do anything about the WaPo writer when his name popped up.

20 posted on 03/07/2007 9:51:20 PM PST by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson