Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Juror Explains Libby Verdict (".. what is HE doing here? Where is Rove and all these other guys..")
Editor&Publisher ^ | March 6, 2007 | Greg Mitchell

Posted on 03/06/2007 10:58:42 AM PST by chesley

Denis Collins said, "We asked ourselves, what is HE doing here? Where is Rove and all these other guys....He was the fall guy."

(Excerpt) Read more at editorandpublisher.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cheney; cialeak; deniscollins; juryofidiots; libby; liberalssuck; libs; moonbats; rove; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-296 next last
To: dirtboy

I agree. Doesn't that statement alone show a problem with the verdict?


221 posted on 03/07/2007 5:17:28 AM PST by rintense (Just say no to McCain in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

Libby had LOUSY LAWYERS....PATHETIC.


222 posted on 03/07/2007 5:19:42 AM PST by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Tim Russert CREDIBLE????What a bunch of IDIOTS!! He LIED thru his teeth.


223 posted on 03/07/2007 5:20:50 AM PST by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EndWelfareToday

Truly, you have placed your finger on the whole point of this little joke of a trial.


224 posted on 03/07/2007 5:54:22 AM PST by chesley ("Socialism" - The devil made them do it..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Purrcival

Who knows what the defense strategy was? But the prosecution hardly proved its case, IMO.


225 posted on 03/07/2007 5:57:19 AM PST by chesley ("Socialism" - The devil made them do it..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Purrcival

Now you've got it.


226 posted on 03/07/2007 5:57:53 AM PST by chesley ("Socialism" - The devil made them do it..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Purrcival

Now you've got it.


227 posted on 03/07/2007 5:58:04 AM PST by chesley ("Socialism" - The devil made them do it..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly

Maybe, but the ones who take the fall are not the ones who have the power to play hardball.


228 posted on 03/07/2007 5:59:35 AM PST by chesley ("Socialism" - The devil made them do it..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: 50mm
"The jury was arguably stupid as well. One of the questions the jury asked the judge is, "Is it illegal for Libby to lie to a newspaper reporter?"

Hardly "stupid". In reality, that was the crux of the weak charges Fizzy pursued.

And the lone jury holdout(s) who asked the question understood that fact exactly; but they were eventually overwhelmed and ground under after 10 days by a self-aggrandizing ComPost reporter & a cadre of DC elitez.

Fizzy tripped up Libby in front of the GJ -- that's Fizzy's specialty -- not about telling, but about recalling different conversations at different times to different reporters (only a BFD in DC); and Libby (ostensibly an actual lawyer) fancied himself a complex man, too much so to adopt the Clintonesque "I don't recall" 200+ times or whatever number Hillary rang up during a Rose Law Firm inquiry.

229 posted on 03/07/2007 6:20:24 AM PST by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: chesley

lol what the hell kind of jury is this?


230 posted on 03/07/2007 6:21:42 AM PST by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chesley

If you are a Republican, there is NO WAY you're going to get a fair jury in the DC area! The first thing Libby's Shyster Lawyer should've done was demand a change of venue.


231 posted on 03/07/2007 6:24:43 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (It's as simple as ABC - Anyone But Clinton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kryptonite
"This Denis fellow ought to be a dandy of a focus within this case from here forward. Did he fully and truthfully answer questions in voir dire? If so, why wasn't he struck for cause?"

"Either he lied or committed misconduct during the trial, or Libby's lawyer committed malpractice in failing to strike him. None of that seems like a stretch given what I've learned today."

Absolutely. Find the sharpest appellate lawyer well-versed in post-jury revelations and pounce.


232 posted on 03/07/2007 6:27:19 AM PST by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver
I stand by my original assessment. The jury members are stupid to think it's illegal to lie to a newspaper reporter.

The crux of Fizzy's charges was that Libby lied under oath to the grand jury - something that is illegal. Fizzy never said the trial was about lying to a newspaper and if he did he would have been laughed out of court.

233 posted on 03/07/2007 6:30:04 AM PST by 50mm (algore uses 20 times as much energy as me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Valin
"Or perhaps Andrea Mitchell had received a Plame leak from a source whom she and Russert would prefer to protect."

"Nudge nudge. Snap snap. Grin grin, wink wink, say no more."

234 posted on 03/07/2007 6:39:20 AM PST by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: chesley

Not a mention of any of this on the local news channels. The sheeple will never hear it.


235 posted on 03/07/2007 6:45:00 AM PST by beansox (DOH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatguy

what the hell kind of jury is this?

The OJ kind.


236 posted on 03/07/2007 6:45:08 AM PST by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: 50mm
"Fizzy never said the trial was about lying to a newspaper and if he did he would have been laughed out of court."

Why should I, or you for that matter, give a rat's ass what Fizzy said the trial was about, given that he lied at the indictment press conference and also lied to the judge about not injecting Plame into his closing arguments.

237 posted on 03/07/2007 6:45:51 AM PST by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

Can anyone explain Bill O'Reilly last night on this? He basically said Cheney wanted to "get back at Wilson" and it went bad. What?!


238 posted on 03/07/2007 6:47:30 AM PST by amutr22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Im not sure who is the bigger moron, this guy, or libby's attorney who allowed him to be on the jury.


239 posted on 03/07/2007 6:49:35 AM PST by beansox (DOH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Purrcival
Libby's attorney SUCKED.

Why was Denis (one "n") the ONLY jurist that came out????

240 posted on 03/07/2007 6:50:32 AM PST by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-296 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson