Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Juror Explains Libby Verdict (".. what is HE doing here? Where is Rove and all these other guys..")
Editor&Publisher ^ | March 6, 2007 | Greg Mitchell

Posted on 03/06/2007 10:58:42 AM PST by chesley

Denis Collins said, "We asked ourselves, what is HE doing here? Where is Rove and all these other guys....He was the fall guy."

(Excerpt) Read more at editorandpublisher.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cheney; cialeak; deniscollins; juryofidiots; libby; liberalssuck; libs; moonbats; rove; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-296 next last
To: P-Marlowe

You're parsing a a statement from a juror. You realize how ridiculous it is to expect that level of grammatical precision from a layman who is not a lawyer, or even a grammarian?


141 posted on 03/06/2007 5:11:26 PM PST by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
I have no clue as to why Libby's lawyers let this former reporter on the Jury. I bet he writes a book.

He's probably already working on it. What did you think of his opening when he said something like: I don't want to seem (sound?) excited...." His tone belied this as he sounded extremely excited, as if he could just see his career being catapaulted into the heights: TV, radio, book deals, movies.

When he went on and on about how they put up all the 2.5 ' by 3 ' post-its, I could just picture him being very persuadive some about the right way in this trial. I hope some of the other jurors talk also.

142 posted on 03/06/2007 5:11:46 PM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Probably not, but there had to be equally stellar, pro-Bush, Republican lawyers available for his defense.


143 posted on 03/06/2007 5:14:29 PM PST by redgirlinabluestate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: CaliGirl-R
The google on the juror in Malkin's columns states:

SPYING: The Secret History of History Book Description Everyone, at some time in his or her life, fantasizes about being a spy--James Bond, Mata Hari, George Smiley, Maxwell Smart. At the new International Spy Museum in Washington, D.C., more than a million visitors have stepped into the secret history of history--and have learned what it is really like to live undercover. This distinctive and fascinating book at once distills and expands upon that experience, with inside information on how spies do their jobs, interviews with operatives, and hundreds of photographs and descriptions of tools of the trade. Biographies of legendary spies and how they completed their special operations are included, along with timelines showing the developments of bugs, surveillance tools, weapons, and disguises. Letters, maps, examples of disguises, dead drops, and rare photos make spies and their operations from 2000 BC to the present live and breathe on every page.

About the Author Denis Collins is a journalist who writes for the Washington Post, the San Jose Mercury News, and the Miami Herald. He lives in Washington, DC.

Other than who he has written for I don't see any liberal bias demonstrated by this google search.

144 posted on 03/06/2007 5:14:47 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: jude24
You realize how ridiculous it is to expect that level of grammatical precision from a layman who is not a lawyer, or even a grammarian?

How about a professional writer? Words are his specialty.

145 posted on 03/06/2007 5:15:34 PM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: jrooney; omega4179
These convictions will be tossed on appeal, if for soley because of Fitz's closing argument where he brought in Plame being a "covert" agent and revealing here identity put here life in danger.

Did he actually use the word "covert?" At the post trial interview Fitz answered a question about Plame's being "classified" by saying something about what it said in the indictment. No one asked him about her being covered by the law that could have made her outing a crime. Should we expect anything but propaganda from the press?

146 posted on 03/06/2007 5:20:02 PM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Grounds for appeal.

BIG TIME!! They new he was the fall guy and yet they convicted him. Out for blood.

147 posted on 03/06/2007 5:23:09 PM PST by areafiftyone (RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - STRENGTH AND LEADERSHIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jude24
"You're parsing a a statement from a juror. You realize how ridiculous it is to expect that level of grammatical precision from a layman who is not a lawyer, or even a grammarian?"

A "layman"? Are you kidding me? A WaPo metro reporter and copy editor who has covered lawyers and courts? Who worked with Woodward? Who rushes the microphones to introduce himself as "I am Denis Colins, with one 'n'."

148 posted on 03/06/2007 5:23:24 PM PST by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

new=knew


149 posted on 03/06/2007 5:23:31 PM PST by areafiftyone (RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - STRENGTH AND LEADERSHIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: jude24; blue-duncan; xzins; Kolokotronis
You're parsing a a statement from a juror. You realize how ridiculous it is to expect that level of grammatical precision from a layman who is not a lawyer, or even a grammarian?

From the Article: Collins, a journalist who has written for The Washington Post and other newspapers....

This guy expresses himself for a living. He is no layman. He was probably an English Major and has a lot better grasp on grammar than 90% of the Lawyers out there.

You are really grasping at straws, jude. The more I read, the more convinced I am that Libby was railroaded.

Would you at least agree that if it only "seemed like he was guilty" that he, as a juror, had a duty to aquit?

Or is it ok to convict someone if it seems like he is guilty?

150 posted on 03/06/2007 5:25:34 PM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib
The President should have come out into the Rose Garden and announced the pardon of Libby and anyone else that Fitz prosecutes on these bogus charges, citing as precedent Billy Jeff's long list of pardons.

Pres. Bush seems unable to defend his own team. This trial never should have happened. Today there was a Senate panel investigating the firing of 6 U.S. Attorneys. Did any Republican say that Clinton fired every single one as soon as he was elected? ...not that I heard. I only heard pubbies saying that "we need to get to the truth."

151 posted on 03/06/2007 5:26:18 PM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Freee-dame

If whatever he writes indicates he went into this thing with his mind made up, that would be grounds for a new trial. Probably he is slick enough to not do that, but it really stinks that he was on the jury in the first place.


152 posted on 03/06/2007 5:28:13 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

Former Colleagues at 'Wash Post' Discuss (Now Famous) Libby Juror

By Joe Strupp, MediaInfo.com / Published: March 06, 2007 5:05 PM ET

NEW YORK - Denis Collins, the juror in the Libby/CIA leak case who delivered a lengthy post-verdict commentary for the press, spent about a decade at The Washington Post, where he covered both metro news and sports, and spent time on the copy desk, according to editors at the paper.

The longtime journalist, who has also written for The Miami Herald and the San Jose Mercury New, is recalled as smart, hardworking and energetic, although not always "coloring within the lines."


153 posted on 03/06/2007 5:29:03 PM PST by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: chesley

A juror using his authority and his role for partisan reasons. Disgraceful. I heard this guy on the radio earlier.


154 posted on 03/06/2007 5:30:06 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chesley
"Harry Reid is already calling for Bush to promise not to pardon Libby. Why would he (Bush) agree?"

Bush should respond by promising not to pardon Harry Reid when Dingy is sent to prison for his crooked land deal.

155 posted on 03/06/2007 5:32:49 PM PST by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: mware

" Is this jurist the one who is a neighbor of Tim Russert and a friend of Bob Woodward???'

That's the impression I got from the Roundtable tonight.
One of the jurors was a former neighbor of Russert and I believe it was Denis with one N!


156 posted on 03/06/2007 5:33:50 PM PST by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: jrooney
I certainly believe it will be overturned on appeal because of Fitz' closing argument, and I can't see how the "baseball" press conference passes muster as well. But I'm not a lawyer. Also, Wilson excluded a lot of evidence that would have, for example, showed Russert to be a perjurer. Although it's not clear to me that it was egregious enough, on its own, to justify an appeal.
157 posted on 03/06/2007 5:35:38 PM PST by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: chesley

The question I haven't hear asked is since when is it illegal for the President or Vice-President (and their offices) to reveal who is or who is not a CIA agent? Isn't the CIA part of the Executive Branch?


158 posted on 03/06/2007 5:35:52 PM PST by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams
In the big picture, we will be safer in a country where perjury is NOT permissible.

Time to put Russert in jail.

159 posted on 03/06/2007 5:44:03 PM PST by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard
No reasonable jury should ever come out and say something like this.

I'm beginning to wonder how reasonable juries really are. Think of the McDonald's hot coffee case for example (assuming that was decided by jury -- I think so, but don't recall clearly). Then there's the preference for certain locales (MS) for tort cases.

I've been told that as an engineer I'm unlikely ever to sit on a jury for anything significant.

160 posted on 03/06/2007 5:52:36 PM PST by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com†|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-296 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson