Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's Wen pledges stronger military
AFP on Yahoo ^ | 3/5/07 | Peter Harmsen

Posted on 03/05/2007 12:07:38 PM PST by NormsRevenge

BEIJING (AFP) - China will continue to strengthen its armed forces, Premier Wen Jiabao said Monday, as the United States expressed concern over a sharp rise in military spending.

Wen made the pledge while addressing nearly 3,000 lawmakers a day after the Chinese government announced the biggest increase in its military budget in recent years.

Spending in 2007 will rise 17.8 percent from last year to 350.9 billion yuan (about 45 billion dollars), it said.

"Building a solid national defence system and a powerful people's army is a strategic task in socialist modernisation," Wen told the opening of the annual session of the National People's Congress, or legislature.

"We must continue to... strictly follow the important guidelines of Comrade (President) Hu Jintao on strengthening the army."

The finance ministry said in a separate report submitted to parliament that the increase would "cover the cost of improving the army's ability to fight a defensive war under hi-tech conditions and respond to emergencies."

Reflecting the increased focus on information technology in the People's Liberation Army, Wen also called for an improved ability to fight a "defensive IT war."

The White House said it was concerned over the increase in military spending, warning it was "inconsistent" with Beijing's policy of peaceful development.

"This kind of spending not only concerns us but raises concerns among China's neighbors. This is inconsistent with China's policy of peaceful development," said national security spokesman Gordon Johndroe.

"We hope they will demonstrate more transparency in the future," Johndroe told AFP.

But Wen's comments and budget increase were applauded by military leaders who want to counter new threats and take back Taiwan.

About one tenth of the parliamentary delegates on Monday were military officers, who turned up at the spacious Great Hall of the People in full uniform.

"It's a good thing. If we don't have a strong defence, it will be hard to develop our motherland. Every country needs a strong defence," Major General Yan Huazheng, a delegate from the northern province of Shanxi, told AFP.

"Taiwan is part of our territory. That of course is a factor (in boosting defence spending), but it's not the only one... there are lots of factors threatening China, and they come from all corners."

Reunification with Taiwan is one of China's long-term objectives, and analysts have said Beijing is beefing up its military partly to enable it to take the island back by force if necessary.

China and Taiwan have been separated since the end of a civil war in 1949, but Beijing still considers the island part of its territory.

"Taiwan is our territory. Just look at history. Why can't we take Taiwan back?" said Tan Naida, a delegate from the National Defence University.

Since the beginning of the decade, Taiwan has been ruled by independence-leaning President Chen Shui-bian, exacerbating fears in Beijing that the island could break away for good.

"If Chen follows up his words with action, the People's Liberation Army can't just ignore it," Su Shuyan, a military representative in parliament, told reporters. "We absolutely won't allow Taiwan to break away from China."

Amid complaints from the United States and elsewhere that China's military budget lacks transparency and is vastly under-estimated, there appeared to be some doubt about exactly how much it would spend on its armed forces in 2007.

While a spokesman Sunday gave the figure for military spending at 350.9 billion yuan, the finance ministry's work report Monday said it would be 347.2 billion yuan.

Defence spending for 2006 went more than 10 million yuan over budget, and this year's stated rise of 17.8 percent is based on actual spending last year.

Compared to the 2006 budget, the figures given for this year represent a 22.3-percent rise.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan; Russia
KEYWORDS: china; military; pledges; stronger; wen

1 posted on 03/05/2007 12:07:41 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
It's not just a pledge, they are in the process of doing it big time.


THE RISING SEA DRAGON IN ASIA

2 posted on 03/05/2007 12:16:59 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
MSM has to help us out:

Who do we invade first, and which order; North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, China, Syria. How can our elective official determine which countries the American people wish to invade after leaving Iraq??????????

3 posted on 03/05/2007 12:34:17 PM PST by 100-Fold_Return (Sell Low--Buy Lower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
 

This is the connotation of "Wen" to me. The modern equivalent of the classic Wen Soldering Gun.

 

Although I suppose a "wen" could also be a wart-like growth on one's face.

4 posted on 03/05/2007 12:35:41 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken (Seldom right but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Window dressing.

In China the military and military service has never been held in esteem. Confucius ranked the soldier below the peasant, and superior only to the actor and the eunuch, as worthy of respect.

5 posted on 03/05/2007 12:58:22 PM PST by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

It's not defense that is driving this buildup. Nobody wants any of China's stuff. China claims all the South China Sea and views Australia as its natural expansion territory. They also view most of Russia as theirs by right. They might not consider India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran as theirs although their empire once extended so far and they need oil such as they would control if they got so far as the Tigris River.


6 posted on 03/05/2007 1:04:58 PM PST by RightWhale (300 miles north of Big Wild Life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

It's not defense that is driving this buildup. Nobody wants any of China's stuff. China claims all the South China Sea and views Australia as its natural expansion territory. They also view most of Russia as theirs by right. They might not consider India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran as theirs although their empire once extended so far and they need oil such as they would control if they got so far as the Tigris River.


7 posted on 03/05/2007 1:05:15 PM PST by RightWhale (300 miles north of Big Wild Life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Window dressing. In China the military and military service has never been held in esteem. Confucius ranked the soldier below the peasant, and superior only to the actor and the eunuch, as worthy of respect.

This ain't Confucius's China. During the Cultural Revolution, children ratted out their parents for complaining about economic conditions, after which some were imprisoned, tortured or even killed. Besides, Confucius's homilies aside, in China, the military has always been one of the paths to power. This Chinese historical tradition is that provinces typically had two heads - one civil and one military. From an early age, Chinese children have drummed into them the importance of violence (under the parental gaze of the Party, of course) in achieving the nation's goals, and the centrality of the PLA in deploying those violent means.

8 posted on 03/05/2007 8:51:32 PM PST by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson