Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.K. hospitals seeing maternity 'crisis'
UPI ^ | 03/04/07

Posted on 03/04/2007 5:36:45 PM PST by nypokerface

LONDON, March 4 (UPI) -- Record numbers of women are dying or being harmed in childbirth in Britain, in what doctors call a crisis in maternity care.

There has been a 21 percent rise in the deaths of pregnant women in the care of National Health Services maternity services, The Independent reported, with 391 such deaths over the past three years.

The numbers are leading to a proliferation of medical negligence claims, the newspaper said.

Experts warn that 10,000 more midwives are needed to curb the number of deaths and injuries during childbirth.

Britain has one of the highest rates of maternal mortality in Europe, with an estimated 13 deaths for every 100,000 births, the newspaper said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: nhs; socializedmedicine; universalhealthcare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 03/04/2007 5:36:46 PM PST by nypokerface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
Socialist Medicine at it's best coming to a hospital near you thanks to Hitlary Clinton.
2 posted on 03/04/2007 5:40:22 PM PST by GaryMontana (islam, the Nazis of today must either be destroyed -- or the human race will perish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
Socialist Medicine at it's best coming to a hospital near you thanks to Hitlary Clinton.
3 posted on 03/04/2007 5:40:29 PM PST by GaryMontana (islam, the Nazis of today must either be destroyed -- or the human race will perish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

Proof that you get what you pay for.


4 posted on 03/04/2007 5:41:33 PM PST by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

This is the model of "Universal Healthcare" Hillary, Barack, and Silky Pony want to inflict on the American public.


5 posted on 03/04/2007 5:58:46 PM PST by Quick or Dead (Both oligarch and tyrant mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms - Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neodad
You make a good point.

No matter what we do to cut costs, when you expect state of the art care and service, that is fast and convenient, you will pay.

On the other hand, have you noticed that the same people who are telling us the merits of social heal care and how our health care costs are exploding are also NEVER the ones who mention how in some US hospitals nearly 40% of those seen in ER's are illegal aliens receiving care at others expense? Will Hillary who will try to weave together majorities by pandering to minorities ever mention that? What do you think? Some topics are taboo politically, even if they shed a slightly different light on the real cause of some of the problems in the first place.
6 posted on 03/04/2007 6:07:11 PM PST by Red6 (Come and get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red6
Before I consider any political or social ramification(s) ... I would want to know why women can't deliver a baby without dieing ?

Is it lack of vitamins?
Lack of vitamin rich food(s)?
Are British women 'broken'?

Seems to me that the act of conception is pretty much routine and the growth of a baby in the womb would be again, I assume, routine ... so that takes care of the preliminary production.

What happens at birth that causes a death ... or shortly after the birth?

Red and blue make purple, always ... without fail ... variations, but purple none-the-less.

7 posted on 03/04/2007 6:24:45 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

Just out of curiosity, I wonder how many of the fatalities also received in vitro services or other means to "force" the pregnancy?


8 posted on 03/04/2007 6:32:49 PM PST by NonValueAdded (Prevent Glo-Ball Warming ... turn out the sun when not in use)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

But hey, it's "free".


9 posted on 03/04/2007 6:40:40 PM PST by AlaskaErik (Everyone should have a subject they are ignorant about. I choose professional corporate sports.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quick or Dead

Silky Pony doesn't really want socialized medicine. There are more doctors and hospitals to sue under the present system, and with bigger payouts, than there would be under socialized medicine.


10 posted on 03/04/2007 6:46:11 PM PST by Fairview ( Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fairview

Ah, but Silky Pony already has a plan to get the money, namely by raising taxes on the "rich" to pay for Socialized Medicine. It won't be about "Edwards the trial lawyer and channeler of dead babies" anymore, it will about "Edwards the President and Herald of the Great Society Redux."


11 posted on 03/04/2007 6:57:29 PM PST by Quick or Dead (Both oligarch and tyrant mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms - Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
I usually see more articles bashing Canadian health care, and calling it socialist. The reality is that US Government per capita spending on health care is $2548 (Medicare), exceeding private and public Canadian per capita spending at $2312, and the UK private and public per capita spending at $1461. We are the ones with the true socialist system, but the reason we don't see the same failures as Canada and the UK is the additional per capita private spending of $1630 for a total of $4178. So any analysis or comparison of the systems should take into account the fact that we outspend them massively.

Please feel free to cite a study that disproves this. I'm not a medical economist, and would really like to be proved wrong on this.

12 posted on 03/04/2007 7:11:29 PM PST by amchugh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

Also, before we crow, Britain still has a lower infant mortality rate than the US at 6.25 vs 7.00 per thousand. (If you believe the OECD stats)


13 posted on 03/04/2007 7:16:28 PM PST by amchugh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amchugh

sorry, 6.05, based on 5.0 last year times 1.21 for 21% growth. I thought it was 25%.


14 posted on 03/04/2007 7:17:31 PM PST by amchugh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
"Experts warn that 10,000 more midwives are needed to curb the number of deaths and injuries during childbirth."

I thought that Europeans weren't having kids any more. Must be all those enlightened Muslims popping out a kid and a half per year. Hmmm... Comforting thought eh?

15 posted on 03/04/2007 7:52:54 PM PST by Desron13 (If you constantly vote between the lesser of two evils then evil is your ultimate destination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf
What happens at birth that causes a death ... or shortly after the birth?

Pray God it's not puerperal (child-birth fever) that killed so many post-delivery women in the past. If it were so than socialized medicine has taken a giant leap back into the 17th century.

16 posted on 03/04/2007 8:25:17 PM PST by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: amchugh

We do outspend them massively, for the same reason that a Mercedes costs more than a Yugo. With medical care, as with everything else, you get what you pay for. The solution is to get the government further OUT of healthcare, not further in. Too much government increases the cost of everything. How much is a toilet seat on a military aircraft versus a toilet seat from Home Depot?


17 posted on 03/05/2007 7:25:45 AM PST by LadyNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LadyNavyVet
I agree that government should have a much more limited role in healthcare, but my point was that our Government spending on health care is greater than their total public+private sector spending on health care. We can hardly tell them their socialist health care is the problem when our own system has even more government involvement. We need to focus on cleaning up our own backyard.

Also, statistically despite the queues and waiting for treatment, they are getting better results on infant mortality, and a host of other medical issues. This is not a condemnation of our own system, but it's certainly not going to further efforts here politically to decouple government from healthcare.

18 posted on 03/05/2007 2:58:21 PM PST by amchugh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: amchugh

"...they are getting better results on infant mortality..."

I think you have to be careful to compare apples to apples. We have a LOT of uninsured, illegal alien women accessing our system to deliver babies without prenatal care. That affects infant mortality rates. Level that playing field and I bet our numbers look pretty good. And, as the article states, mother mortality is on the rise under the British health care system. I haven't seen any indication that's happening over here.

Also, another thing that is never counted in US-European healthcare comparisons is that our huge monetary investment includes the vast majority of the medical research and development done worldwide, the benefits of which are shared with the rest of the world at very little cost.


19 posted on 03/05/2007 3:15:36 PM PST by LadyNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LadyNavyVet
"I think you have to be careful to compare apples to apples." Hence my qualifier on the statement of the word 'statistical'. If you factored out those in this country who are not covered by private or public health I'm sure you'd get a better idea of the overall quality of our medical care. Indeed, we rank 1st in the world in responsiveness of our medical care. But if we can not beat these countries out on the stats (we should probably come up with better metrics so that we do; lies, damn lies, and statistics), we are going to have a harder slog in terms of improving our public policy in ways that make our system less like theirs instead of more.

Britain is catching up to us at a maternal mortality of 13/100,000 (2006) up from 11/100000 (2000). We have 20/100,000 (2000). I do not have data for 2006, so I do not know if we are trending up or down.

As for medical research, our federal drug funding is 6 cents per capita. Our total NIH funding is about $104 per capita. I'm not sure totals like that are that large compared to our spending levels on services. Do not forget also that foreign countries contribute to medical research in the US in the form of prescription drug costs.

I think most of the medical economists are thinking now that medical expenditures are rising because demand is so high it is pushing us into huge marginal costs. The emphasis and expectation on responsiveness with our medical system is part of that.

My wife pointed out last night that our healthcare policies are a drive towards fiscal conservatives adopting nanny-state ideas. The specific example was the trans-fat ban. By covering obesity related medical expenses we are not punishing people fiscally for their bad choices, but instead having government step in to legislate against those choices. This has the effect of splitting libertarians and fiscal conservatives on some issues.

20 posted on 03/05/2007 5:27:51 PM PST by amchugh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson