Posted on 03/04/2007 1:04:27 PM PST by Al Simmons
From Meet The Depressed with Russert:
[But when a]sked by Tim Russert on Meet the Press in 2000 if he supported President Bill Clintons veto of a law that would have banned the disputed abortion procedure, Mr. Giuliani said, I would vote to preserve the option for women. He added, I think the better thing for America to do is to leave that choice to the woman, because it affects her probably more than anyone else.
Rudy is a liar.
L
From 1997: [O]n a 1997 candidate questionnaire from the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League of New York, which Mr. Giuliani completed and signed, he marked yes to the question: Would you oppose legislation requiring a minor to obtain permission from a parent or from a court before obtaining an abortion.
Rudy wants your 14 year old daughter to be able to get an abortion without your knowledge or consent. If she wants to get her ears pierced, she needs parental consent. If she wants to get a tattoo, she needs parental consent.
But if your 14 year old daughter wants an abortion, Rudy thinks you have no right to even know about it.
He's a liar and a fraud.
L
Here's his position:
One of the most aggressive gun control advocates today is Republican mayor Rudolph Giuliani of New York City, whose administration sued 26 gun manufacturers in June 2000, and whose police commissioner, Howard Safir, proposed a nationwide plan for gun licensing, complete with yearly "safety" inspections.
Rudy is a fraud.
L
Excellent article. Thanks
Your posts have been nailing Rudy. LOL! Good job!
It's like shooting fish in a barrel.
L
I did look it up, well before today. I looked it up again to verify my memory. Now I'm telling you to back up your assertion - what were the paper reporting requirements you referenced? And this selling guns to children is a new assertion, so why don't you provide a reference for that as well?
Truth hurts but there it is, Rino Rudy will split the party.
Dear RINO Rudy Supporters,
I want to thank you for your wonderful support in helping to get me elected. Bill and I are so thrilled to be back in the White House again. Your active support for Rudy and getting him nominated was the key to me winning. Without your help Bill and I would not be here today.
Affectionately Yours,
President Hillary Rodman
P.S. I plan to nominate Rudy to the Supreme Court as soon as there is a vacancy. He will help us tilt the court back in our favor and assure that millions more unborn babies will never see the light of day. After all, it's every woman's right!
P.S.S. As you recall, my campaign slogan was, "We're Going to Take Things Away From You on Behalf of the Common Good" ALL YOUR POSSESIONS BELONG TO ME---SUCKER!!!! YEEHAAAAAAAA!!!!!!
Again, he did not REVOKE permits; he turned the automatic renewal into a new process that made it extremely difficult to renew.
Thanks for the clarification...
*engaging brain*
There...got it.
Oh, that is so weak. It is always the regular citizens who are hampered from getting guns, not criminals, whoi will always have guns no matter what laws are passed. It is RIDICULOUS for you to state that "more thugs got their hands on even more guns" as a result of the city losing their lawsuit. You have no way of knowing the exact number or provenance of illegal weapons before and after the suit was filed. Neither did Rudy.
If he did, he could have gone after the illegal suppliers in his own city rather than the legitimate manufacturers of a legal product. Problem solved, with everyone's rights intact. That wasn't good enough for Rudy, who for all his talk of "freedom" and "choices" is at best a major-league CONTROL FREAK when it comes to handguns, with which he is IRRATIONALLY OBSESSED.
Rudy is not a conservative he is a Liberal. She is just a little more to the left then he is.
My position is do not elect a RINO, but instead put a Socialist in the WH and lets let this fever run its course.
Rudy would do nothing more then slow the train down towards a Socialist USA, and not by much.
So lets get it down and deal with the Socialists in office.
The Republican Party has been infected by Liberals that the only reson they joined was so they dould co-opt the Conservative movement.
A Liberal is a Liberal no matter what party, and I am sick of them.
Never!
That's ridiculous. There is nothing therapeutic about letting socialists gain power. The State ends up taking a life of its own, enabling ambitious tyrants to climb the ladder of power.
Once you get universal government health care in the United States, for example, we will *never* get rid of it. I can't think of a single capitalist country that has gotten rid of socialized medicine once it is enabled. Politicians will get called haters of the children, of the poor, of the elderly, and basically enemies of the dependent classes the government creates.
Social issues, in contrast, are far more malleable, and the worst case with Rudy is that he maintains the status quo in that realm.
Rudy has the same position on partial birth abortion as FR's darling Hunen Dunker.
You seem really shook about Rudy ...if he's such a wild eyed liberal then he won't get the nod ..so whats up with all the hysteria?
WOT is #1, - AND IF YOU GET NOTHING MORE OUT OF THIS POST, PLEASE GET THIS
How can this be true other you and he says it is when he supports aministy for illegal aliens?
and how is he "tough" on the war on terror?
"tough on terror" is just a phrase and actually means nothing. The Clintons and Janet Reno were "tough on terror" also. If you don't believe that just ask one of the Branch Davidians and legitimate firearm collectors and owners they terrorized and imprisoned and killed.
I do not personally want someonr who is "tough on terror".
I want someone who will adhere to the Constitution of the United States of America. There are provisions in it to deal with terrorists.
For all the Rudy tootere out there who claim to be Conservative just remember that a leopard cannot change his spots.
It is not altogether true that a President does not enact law[s]. He has the authority to issue Exercutive Orders which have the force , until overturned by Congress, of law. Also he has a tremendous influence on which laws will be enacted.
Oh, but that's not a flame, right?
Since you decided to personalize this, let's take this in order: (1) You still didn't answer my question, you moron: How does my vote in a presidential election effect the status of my immortal soul?
(2) Giuliani can win; none of the pro-life candidates currently declared can. I'd prefer Giuliani to Hillary, Edwards, Dodd, Obama, et. al.
(3) Your "intellect" makes me want to re-consider my position on the abortion issue. Why don't you pound a big pile of sand up your rectum?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.