Posted on 03/04/2007 1:04:27 PM PST by Al Simmons
Hillary and Rudy lead the polls.
So a lot of people agree with you that the WOT should be turned over to a president with no military or foreign policy experience.
I think that's an amazing fantasy.
Oh well, we survived Woodrow Wilson's presidency...
"And NO, no matter how many times you call us other things, we are [not] Conservatives."
There, fixed it for you. By supporting a big-government socialist like Rudy McGiuliRomney, the only thing you are trying to "conserve" is big government socialism and you know it. Rudy is about ZERO percent different from or better than HiLIARy, based on his own words. Too bad, so sad, he's toast as far as people who wish to see our Constitutional Republic conserved and strengthened.
And Bill Clinton's (the modern equivalent to Wilson's mendacious presidency and cowardice).
But we may not survive Her Heinousness.
So, keeping in track with 1912, pray tell WHERE is the Teddy Roosevelt whom we should vote for over Rudy?
Rather than abortions, the reason why there are fewer babies to adopt here, if that birth control is much more readily available now, the stigma of being an unwed mother has been removed and for the past 35+ years, girls are keeping their bastards ( yes, I know, many object to that word, but that is what they are ), and until rather recently, welfare has allowed girls to keep their babies.
There was nothing "cruel" nor "crude" about what I posted.
OTOH, what you posted in reply, is patently false! The thing about Africa being the "only" place left to adopt babies from and that class warfare guff about the rich and famous, is hardly Conservative thought.
Yes, that is what YOU are...a LIAR!
126 are solidly against Giuliani
25 are solidly for Giuliani
19 cannot be identified, so are labeled neutral, waitnsee
74% are solidly against Giuliani
15% are solidly for Giuliani
11% are undecided
This just reinforces my opinion that FR is a collection point for the majority of smart, well informed and patriotic people who frequent the 'net.
They did and more thugs, not regular citizens, got their hands on even more guns.
It doesn't matter what you IQ is, if you are unable to actually USE it.
"Rudy is a PRINCIPLED CONSERVATIVE"
Whoops, there goes your credibility...
It certainly was against selling guns to children, which was being done.
Make that 127 are solidly against Giuliani.
It would be nice if you could stop seeing things that are not there.
Rudy should run with her as a democrat.
How exactly do the easily documented facts I've posted about Ted Olson qualify as a "tinfoil theory"? Are you unaware that people often sign on as campaign advisers in hopes of future appointements?
Let me ask YOU a simple yes or no question, do YOU think abortion should be legal? YES or NO
Objectively, Rudy is not a strong candidate for a WOT president.
No one directly disputes this, even his supporters. Who, however, repeatedly say the WOT is a reaon to support him!
How this negative of his will play out in the next few years
remains to be seen. However it is indisputably a negative for Rudy, not a plus.
His tough talk is good politickin' but objectively Hillary has better (though deficient) credentials.
The media can be expected to exploit this in the election campaign if Rudy gets the nomination.
*ROTFLMAO!!* You had me til this line! I mean, people have accused me of sounding pompous, but this is a bit much...
He's not a flip-flopper. You may not agree with all of his positions, but he sticks to his guns. And he is a Conservative. The fact that he may not pass your 'purity test' doesn't mean that he is not.
CINO
Conservative in name only
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.