If Giuliani can get through primaries, he stacks up well

St. Petersburg Times ^ | March 4, 2007 | ADAM C. SMITH

[DKNY]

If Giuliani can get through primaries, he stacks up well For a guy commonly regarded as a hero after 9/11, Mayor Giuliani is too quickly dismissed by presidential handicappers. Here's why he deserves a second look.

St. Petersburg Times

[politicalwit]

Rudy believes that the founding principle of the GOP is limited government, not limitd freedom.

I suppose gun control is limited government as well as CFR, expanding government programs, NCLB and the illegal alien issue.

Why did you think that the 'homosexual issue' is so important...

The homosexual agenda is in direct opposition of basic and traditional marriage definations.

what he did in turning around New York was something even you could have done.

Perhaps I could. After all, I do have experience in business turnarounds for one of the largest healthcare organizations in the world. I would hope that Rudy didn't micromanage the response of the events of 911. Sure the CEO either accepts or rejects the operational plans of department heads, but it is those individual managers that do the work, not the CEO.

[politicalwit]

<|;~)

[Maeve]

As you note, "Yeah, right". Your potentiality argument is a Nazi line of reasoning in the extermination of the disabled, the Jews, and the Gypsies.

The science is in the DNA, cell division, organization, and growth.

Living human DNA reproduces living human DNA. It isn't reptilian DNA with the "potential" of becoming human life. It is human life at the most basic unit of existence from its first moment of inception.

[Maeve]

However, at some point, it does become a human life and abortion is no different from infanticide.

There is absolutely no scientific support for your position. If it starts with human DNA, it is human.

[Luis Gonzalez]

"By law Joe had to run on a party ballot.

Joe was NOT affiliated with ANY party, that's why he ran as an INDEPENDENT in the general election after having failed to win the nomintaion during the Primaries.

INDEPENDENT means NOT AFFILATED WITH ANY PARTY.

Who was the Independent Party candidate in the Massachusetts primaries?

Joe did not run as a candidate for two different parties on the same election.

[Luis Gonzalez]

"He had to collect signatures and follow the state rules for being a their party candidate."

What Party?

[texastoo]

Joe was NOT affiliated with ANY party, that's why he ran as an INDEPENDENT in the general election after having failed to win the nomintaion during the Primaries.

INDEPENDENT means NOT AFFILATED WITH ANY PARTY.

Who was the Independent Party candidate in the Massachusetts primaries?,

Joe did not run as a candidate for two different parties on the same election.

First of all, Joe Lieberman is NOT from Masssachusetts. He is from Connecticut. I don't know who the Independent Party candidate in Massachusetts was.

Joe did not run as an independent. He formed his own political party using his own name. He collected close to 20,000 signature as the first step in forming his political party. (Proving it can be done). It sure was nice of the Republicans to switch and not put a Democrat into office.

I suggest you google Joe Lieberman, 2006 election ballot.If I am not mistaken there were 4 or 5 different parties in Ct.

So far as I know, one has to run under a party label and follow the rules for parties. In every state the party is labeled on the ballot.