Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani Has No Real Chance With GOP Voters . . . or Does He?
The Washington Post ^ | March 4, 2007 | Dan Balz

Posted on 03/04/2007 2:13:52 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

The 2008 presidential campaign is just weeks old, but already an article of faith within the Republican Party -- the belief that no politician who favors abortion rights and gay rights can win the GOP nomination -- is being challenged by the candidacy of former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani.

...."This is the first Republican presidential primary since Sept. 11," said Ed Gillespie, ... "Rudy Giuliani is a candidate who can clearly test the proposition that a Republican who is more moderate on social issues can capture the nomination. He's testing it now."

....Whit Ayres, a Georgia-based Republican pollster, said he has been struck by the number of conservatives he has encountered who disagree with Giuliani on abortion or gay rights but are still attracted to him as a possible Republican nominee. ....

"It truly is the question in Republican presidential politics at the moment," Ayres said. "There are a lot of people with a more traditional view who think that his leading in the polls is just a mirage and that he has no real chance. I don't believe that. I think there's more to this than simply name ID. "

...A veteran Republican strategist, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to candidly assess the situation, said he is among those who long believed that a Republican with Giuliani's profile would have no chance. He still believes the former mayor faces significant obstacles but said the odds of Giuliani winning the nomination are not as remote as they once seemed.

He gave three reasons: the absence of a strong, traditional conservative in the GOP field; continuing antipathy among many social and religious conservatives toward McCain; and the prospect of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) becoming the next president.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: duncanhunter; election; giuliani; politics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-300 next last
To: Cincinatus' Wife

"I certainly will but my support makes others label me a liberal."


I'm not sure that's true. Do you think its your support of him BEFORE he wins the nomination that makes others label you a liberal?



MM


21 posted on 03/04/2007 2:40:48 AM PST by motormouth (It's not true that life is one damn thing after another; it is one damn thing over and over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BonnieJ; EQAndyBuzz

Clinton caused the 1994 GOP Revolution. It was worth it. Ending a 40 year LOCK on the Congress was absolutely worth it.


22 posted on 03/04/2007 2:41:50 AM PST by narses ("Freedom is about authority." - Rudolph Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I'm sure he has a chance with a good number of republican voters...and no chance at all with another fairly significant portion of republican voters. So if he's the republican candidate it's likely the republican base will be split and the dems will likely win the White House. Counting on people to vote the party ticket because it's not as horrific as the opposition is a very weak strategy. No matter what you WILL lose some of the base. Wouldn't have taken very many in 2000 to have changed the outcome...and not that many more to have changed it in 2004. It's a bad bet.
23 posted on 03/04/2007 2:43:01 AM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motormouth
I'm not sure that's true. Do you think its your support of him BEFORE he wins the nomination that makes others label you a liberal?

Give me a candidate that will win the White House and I'll consider it.

24 posted on 03/04/2007 2:43:52 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

And the Republican party goes down the tubes.


25 posted on 03/04/2007 2:46:29 AM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses

But will it be worth two liberals to replace Stevens and Ginsberg? One Conservative of the two and Roe V Wade is over.

Isn't that what you want? You will not get that with four, possible eight years of a Democrat President. Think about 51 Democrats in the Senate and Hillary. One change to the rules and we are back to the 1990's. Because with Hillary and 51 Senators they will go nuclear.



26 posted on 03/04/2007 2:46:48 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (The Clintons: A Malignant Malfeasance of the Most Morbid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

I don't watch television much, but other people have been telling me that sponsors of the Giuliani "news" have chosen Giuliani for the Republican side.


27 posted on 03/04/2007 2:47:34 AM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Morning Jim. Early enough for you?


28 posted on 03/04/2007 2:47:59 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (The Clintons: A Malignant Malfeasance of the Most Morbid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW
...So if he's the republican candidate it's likely the republican base will be split and the dems will likely win the White House...

I don't agree. I see Giuliani picking up a strong Republican following along with Independents, anti-Hillary voters and Reagan Democrats.

29 posted on 03/04/2007 2:48:21 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

No, but it is getting late.


30 posted on 03/04/2007 2:48:50 AM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Rudy's has a track record of appointing liberals. So much for the SCOTUS if he gets in.


31 posted on 03/04/2007 2:49:01 AM PST by narses ("Freedom is about authority." - Rudolph Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: narses

"Rudy's has a track record of appointing liberals. So much for the SCOTUS if he gets in."

That's right. As mayor he was given a choice of nominees by the city council. Being a liberal city, that's what he was given to work with.

He already said if elected he would appoint strict constructionists in the mold of Scalia.


32 posted on 03/04/2007 2:50:58 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (The Clintons: A Malignant Malfeasance of the Most Morbid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Suicide is always sad to watch. The GOP embraced how many Democrats over the last dozen years? Now we get to watch them take over the party. Maybe. Unless we fight. I am going to be trying for delegate status again so that at least one voice will be heard.


33 posted on 03/04/2007 2:51:59 AM PST by narses ("Freedom is about authority." - Rudolph Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
WP & NYT and the rest of the libmedia are determined to keep drumming how the ex-mayor is the perfect GOP candidate.

This is pure propaganda. If they repeat it enough times, they think they can wear down the base with slanted polls.
34 posted on 03/04/2007 2:52:15 AM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BonnieJ
But now...To vote 3rd party out of anger at the GOP choice and let them in again? That seems a crime to me.

On many issues, Giuliani is Xlinton. Except he's actually a little more trashy in his personal life than the Xlintons.
35 posted on 03/04/2007 2:54:21 AM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

He lied to his first two wives, I have no interest in being lied to by him about the SCOTUS. He also praised Ginsburg and endorsed Cuomo. A twice divorced, remarried Catholic who advocates "gay rights" and "sanctuary city" status for illegal aliens as well as almost all abortion remaining legal won't fly. His gun-grabbing and his horrid record on appointments (google Kerik) all make him a very bad choice.


36 posted on 03/04/2007 2:54:54 AM PST by narses ("Freedom is about authority." - Rudolph Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
And the Republican party goes down the tubes.

No Jim the party will grow. The country is too evenly divided and we can't let a Democrat control the Executive again for 4 to 8 years. Hillary will appoint the most liberal justices she can find.

Gun control, abortion and gay issues are always in the news and it isn't just conservatives that oppose LIBERAL measures. People do pay attention and as LIBERALS overplay their hand, it's not being well received and people are beginning to react negatively toward them. Local elections must not be underestimated and ignored. I don't think concerns about these issues will go down the tubes but I don't think they must define the GOP. There are other issues important to this country - - environmentalist creep, smaller government, education and a strong defense to name a few.

37 posted on 03/04/2007 3:01:48 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
"I don't agree. I see Giuliani picking up a strong Republican following along with Independents, anti-Hillary voters and Reagan Democrats."

IMO, many "anti-Hillary voters," if faced with a choice between Giuliani and a Democrat, won't vote for either. Most of the "Independents" and "Reagan Democrats" you're referring to voted for Hillary during the '90s.
38 posted on 03/04/2007 3:03:26 AM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: narses

What a dilemma. If a moderate is nominated Conservatives stay home. If a Conservative is nominated, moderates will vote Democrat.

I think someone very famous said it best, "And the Republican party goes down the tubes."


39 posted on 03/04/2007 3:05:03 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (The Clintons: A Malignant Malfeasance of the Most Morbid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The Republican Party has historically been a broad coalition. It began life as a coalition of Whigs, Free Soilers and anti-slavery Democrats - they all could only agree on the issue of slavery to start with.

If the party narrows, it will lose votes and lose power. Becoming "exclusive" rather than a "big tent", particularly when Democrats are trying to pull votes from the centre with their "Blue Dogs", is a recipe for electoral suicide.

Regards, Ivan

40 posted on 03/04/2007 3:06:05 AM PST by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-300 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson