Skip to comments.
Teheran Agents Smuggled In Missile That Shot Down RAF Helicopter In Iraq
The Telegraph (UK) ^
| 3-3-2007
| Sean Rayment
Posted on 03/03/2007 6:57:28 PM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
03/03/2007 6:57:34 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
2
posted on
03/03/2007 6:59:50 PM PST
by
Jet Jaguar
(Redeploy to Tehran)
To: blam
No retaliation though, I'm afraid.
3
posted on
03/03/2007 7:01:38 PM PST
by
b4its2late
(Liberalism is a hollow log and a mental disorder.)
To: blam
The Lynx Mark 7 was travelling low over central Basra on a sortie to familiarise Wg Cdr Coxen with the dangers that his pilots might face.Wonder if there was some intel that got to the insurgents that they decided this weapon was worth using to get a high value target. What's a wing commander equivalent to, a colonel?
4
posted on
03/03/2007 7:03:08 PM PST
by
GATOR NAVY
(Naming CVNs after congressmen and mediocre presidents burns my butt)
To: blam
"British troops found discarded missile parts in a nearby building after the incident."That's enough for me.
5
posted on
03/03/2007 7:03:24 PM PST
by
Eagles6
(Dig deeper, more ammo.)
To: blam
6
posted on
03/03/2007 7:04:25 PM PST
by
ducdriver
("Impartiality is a pompous name for indifference, which is an elegant name for ignorance." GKC)
To: blam
7
posted on
03/03/2007 7:07:22 PM PST
by
Jet Jaguar
(Redeploy to Tehran)
To: blam
In the "Old Days" that would be a Caussus Belli.......
8
posted on
03/03/2007 7:10:35 PM PST
by
Red Badger
(Britney Spears shaved her head............Well, that's one way of getting rid of headlice.........)
To: blam
If you've tied your own hands and already announced there will be no response, what's the point of an inquiry?
9
posted on
03/03/2007 7:12:21 PM PST
by
SittinYonder
(Ic þæt gehate, þæt ic heonon nelle fleon fotes trym, ac wille furðor gan)
To: GATOR NAVY
It is equivalent to a Lt. Col.
10
posted on
03/03/2007 7:16:23 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: blam
The Foreign Office is expected to use the findings to step up diplomatic pressure on the Iranian government, which has been asked to crack down on units within its defence and security services believed to be supplying weapons and bomb-making technology to insurgents in Iraq. Which is to say that they are following the same line as General Peter Pace: We don't know if the Iranian government is responsible, or "rogue elements." A good way out if you don't want to fight back. And nice ammunition for the peaceniks.
11
posted on
03/03/2007 7:22:31 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: b4its2late
WWI, we kicked the Kaisers ass. WWII, we whipped the Japanese and Germans. After that we became sensitive to the wiles of world consensus. Since than we have lost in Korea, lost in VN. And will probably lose in ROPistan.
12
posted on
03/03/2007 7:23:34 PM PST
by
doc1019
(Fred Thompson 08)
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: Red Badger
In the "Old Days" that would be a Caussus Belli....... In the Old Days, the Soviets did it to us in Vietnam and we did it to them in Afghanistan. No war.
14
posted on
03/03/2007 8:15:14 PM PST
by
Grut
To: Cicero
What evidence is there of "rogue element" activity elsewhere in the recent past from Iran? Assuming for a moment there is some such evidence, would it be more comparable to the CIA black ops than to French Foreign Legionnaires?
That is in part to ask, are Iranian military elements with access and wherewithal to carry out the missile shoot-down of a low-flying, five-person British Wing Commander's helicopter over Basrah likely to be "rogue" or likely "undocumented foreign fighters?"
(Can one find truly "rogue element" activity from the US military since "Kelly's Heroes," outside the CIA?)
HF
15
posted on
03/03/2007 8:24:56 PM PST
by
holden
To: johnsantosjr
Presumably General Pace said what he was cleared to say, I agree. Whoever actually coordinated these responses really screwed up, since it allowed the news media to say, first you tell us one thing and then you tell us another. So they were able to imply that the first responses were lies.
16
posted on
03/03/2007 8:47:45 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: holden
I don't know how you would absolutely rule out any sort of independent action at lower levels, but it doesn't seem terribly likely.
I think this is just a bit of diplomatic hedging.
17
posted on
03/03/2007 8:49:30 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: blam; MadIvan
Ping
18
posted on
03/03/2007 9:36:57 PM PST
by
Chgogal
(Vote Al Qaeda. Vote Democrat.)
To: doc1019
You are correct, the difference with all is the MSM wants to see you fail, the ratings of bad news is more important than national pride and national security.
To: Cicero
To the degree a military maintains training and discipline would be the degree it would be unlikely there would be rogue elements. As Iran's Global Firepower rating is 16th in the world, i.e., fairly high, I would think it unlikely there be rogue elements, to the point that one would have to quickly and publicly say to the Iranian Government, "Please show the world the paper trail of these armaments (including 100+ sniper rifles, IEDs, shaped projectiles, etc.), how they were long ago reported stolen, and how their delivery to Iraq could have been done by anyone other than by Iranian troops, over whom we understand you to have complete control--if anyone is to believe they weren't officially ordered to Iraq by
you."
HF
20
posted on
03/04/2007 8:01:54 AM PST
by
holden
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson