Posted on 03/02/2007 6:30:19 PM PST by PhiKapMom
Excellent! This is what I saw as well.
Thanks for the report.
When Rudy states in no uncertain terms that he will veto HR 1022 and any other AWB as well as all other forms of gun control I'll listen to what he has to say. But tell me you're going to ban my guns and I'll fight you all the way.
Amen bruddah.
Rudy's cleanup and turn-around of NYC is nothing short of amazing. He has accomplished more as DA and then mayor of NYC than all the other presidential candidates {repub and dem} combined.
The freepers demanding conservative purity are disregarding an incredibly accomplished man. He doesn't just talk like Tancredo, McCain, Hunter, Thompson, et al; he has acted and delivered.
Well, that least your support of Rudy lets us know you have no respect for the unborn. I guess your solution to abortion is to allow the queers to marry.
Rudy can woooooooo all he wants. This conservative is not going to vote for him.
Duncan Hunter is now in the game.
TOTAL and UNEQUIVOCAL...
BULLSH*T.
We've listed, over and over again, ALL of his UNARGUABLY LIBERAL positions that point to the FACT that RINO-rudy is 95% LIBERAL... PERIOD.
Well, that least your support of Rudy lets us know you have no respect for the unborn. I guess your solution to abortion is to allow the queers to marry.
I didn't realize I had a guy.
Strange you refer to my comment as "Scummy". The fact still remains you are supporting an individual that supports abortion and gay marriage.
Truth kinda stings doesn't it?
The fact still remains you are supporting an individual that supports abortion and gay marriage.
Great posting, Flashbunny. I think you should add what I call the "no crickets" trailer because what I'm finding is that whenever I ask a rudy supporter a substantial question, I get no response.
From the video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVBtPIrEleM
Maybe your candidate is the one who's a liar. He certainly loses my vote.
Gay Rights:
CNN Clip:
Announcer: "As mayor he supported civil unions, and extending health and other benefits to gay couples."
ABC Clip: "I supported domestic partnership legislation and signed it"
Meet The Press:
Tim Russert: "So should gay people be openly allowed to serve?"
"I think people should be judged on the merits. And there should not be a specific focus on someone's sexual orientation."
Aint none of them wooing crap from conservatives.
http://thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/Comment/DickMorris/020707.html
Here's your proof for the frontrunner normally always winning. As far as your argument that the more people know about Rudy, the more is poll numbers will fall is a fallacy. Election coverage as greatly increased in the last month and this additional coverage coincides with Rudy's surge in the polls.
Yet more...."I just don't see Rudy Giuliani being able to sway conservatives within the Republican Party," says Michael Long, chairman of the New York state Conservative Party. "The gay marriage issue draws a line down the middle of the street, and Rudy Giuliani is something of a champion of gay rights."
And yet more..."Leading contenders on both sides, such as Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R), support civil unions and expanding other rights for gay Americans."...Southern Voice
Wait, there's more..."Rudy Guiliani said that he is "seriously considering" a presidential run. Those who think that the 9/11 hero would be a formidable candidate are forgetting about the 9/10 Rudy. Meaning, this is a guy who is pro-choice on abortion, pro-gay rights and moved in with a gay couple after a messy breakup with his wife that came as he was dating another woman. Source: 2008 Speculation by Howard Kurtz in Washington Post Jul 14, 2006"
If you would care for about another 900K pages of subject matter I suggest you simply go to Google.
My statement still stands with the required documentation. Appears your the apparent liar and/or just plain ignorant.
Thanks! You just made me burst out laughing! Way to tell it like it is!
Rudy kisses homosexual men:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1794318/posts?page=1,50
You don't have a clue -- he said it was not a federal issue and he was right. It belonged in the States not a federal marriage amendment to the Constitution. Our States have taken care of it as its voters have seen fit.
Your boy could care less about the republican party platform. BTW...you're the one that is clueless.
You said:
"The early frontrunner for the GOP nomination hasn't lost since 1952."
The article says:
"Among Republicans, Nixon in 60 and 68, Ford in 76, Reagan in 80, Bush in 88, Dole in 96, and Bush in 00 were all front-runners going in and the nominee coming out. Only Goldwater can be said to have pulled off an upset in 1964 by toppling Rockefeller."
So you said since 1952, and "hasn't lost", as in never. Goldwater passed Rockefeller. And the article references a time since 1960, not 1952 as you stated.
And you seem to miss this important fact from the toe sucker: "The key for the candidates is to become the early front-runner and hold the position for the first three quarters of 2007."
We're not even out of the first quarter of 2007. There's still time to go. Time will tell. But if the reaction of the rudy fans here is any indication, the biggest threat rudy faces is the truth about his own positions, statements, and policies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.