Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Global Warming Ecophobia
NeoVista ^ | 03/01/2007 | Bob Gonzalez

Posted on 03/01/2007 5:03:35 PM PST by etradervic

I must confess no small reluctance to address the mania surrounding global warming since it rightly belongs to the purview of science. But since the Ecophobes, who have eagerly fabricated this red herring, have misused Science (assuming it was used at all) to advance a cause that will serve as a distraction from the Left’s failings everywhere else, I thought that I might be forgiven if I broached the subject.

The most notable aspect of the Gore film is that its premise is based upon a lie which is then followed by several deceptions. The film begins by bilking its unfortunate audience into believing that CO2 is the cause of global warming by correlating graphs of CO2 and temperature increases over time. Although increases in CO2 levels have been attendant to increases in global temperature (but not always), science indicates that CO2 increases have lagged increases in global temperature. It is, therefore, more likely that CO2 is an effect of and not the cause of global warming.

After real scientists point to such “inconvenient truths,” one would think that this apostle of an apocryphal apocalypse would pack up his trunk of alchemy and snake oil and hightail it back to Tennessee. Instead, when faced with facts and the lack of their own evidence, Ecophobes will descend to even lower depths of puerile hysteria. Gore has connived in his film to delude its audience into believing that they (and of course evil corporations) are responsible for global warming. Once the causality between CO2 and temperature is debunked, however, the Ecophobes do not have a legitimate argument. Indeed, the warming period that we are enjoying today actually began approximately 18,000 years ago while Al Gore’s Neanderthal ancestor was still laboring to invent the square wheel in an Alpine cave. Like many aspects of nature, climate change is cyclical. Whether it is initiated by Sun Spot volatility or volcanic activity, our planet has, over time, experienced natural cycles of cooling and warming long before the first human appeared.

Your typical Ecophobe will then argue “surely all of this CO2 that we are spewing into the atmosphere must be having some effect!” Maybe, but it does not seem to be causing global warming. Don’t claim that it does unless you have evidence. The burden of proof belongs to those with the preposterous claims - hysterics are no substitute. A casual glance at the graph supplied from the National Center for Atmospheric Research illustrates that the current inter-glacial period appears very similar to the last.

The next graph from NASA demonstrates temperature fluctuation over a very narrow range during the past century. The increase from 1900 to 2000 is a negligible increase of approximately 1 degree. Any Ecofreak who would lose his mind over an increase of 1 degree Fahrenheit during the entire 20th century while the Earth is in an 18,000 year warming cycle could hardly be expected to engage in logical inquiry in order to formulate an objective opinion. Conversely, the puppeteers of global warming propaganda are targeting the weak-minded, gullible minions - the same people who watch Oprah and answer spam email from the Prince of Togo.

My main disappointment is with the scientific community. It is a sorry state of affairs when America's most renown "scientist" is a political reprobate like Al Gore. There has been an ever-growing trend for science to become more and more politicized. The vast majority of climatologists who know that Gore is full of CO2 are largely quiescent. Scientists have been conditioned, whether in the face of the Left’s last lie about AIDS decimating the American population or it's the new fad in String Theory, into compliance. If you are riding the latest wave of Leftist hysteria or amenable to the latest theoretical fancy, you are more likely to be funded. Besides being a corruption of science, it is also a considerable waste of resources – scientific and otherwise.

Another great deception is that global warming is inherently bad. Global warming is evidently, as mentioned previously, a natural phenomena characteristic of the planet’s long-term climate cycle which alternates between glacial and inter-glacial periods. Today, we are thankfully in an inter-glacial period. One day the Earth will be in another glacial period which will send glacial sheets down to Berlin. This will be followed by another warm inter-glacial episode and so forth. What is dangerous and irresponsible is not the Earth’s climate cycles but arrogant bureaucrats who purport to manipulate the Earth’s climate and deviate the Planet from its natural cycle.

The UN attempt to employ the drivel emanating from their shill scientists as a pretext for mandating their ludicrous “global temperature ceiling” betrays the UN as a pandering, corrupt, vacuous organization desperate to control the economies of other nations and the lives of their citizenry. The true purpose behind the global warming Ecophobia is to rouse the leftist rabble. The Left is a failure when it comes to protecting Americans from terrorism, fixing the school system or social security, but they can surely save us all from an AIDS epidemic or a global warming crisis that do not exist. As Rush Limbaugh accurately posited, "the anti-capitalist Left has found a home in the environmental movement." The solutions that the Left proposes to dispel their fanciful visions of cataclysmic climate disaster consists of punishing American business and forfeiting control to central government – all Leftist goals.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: environment; globalwarming; left
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: secretagent

And a cathartic dose of guilt.


21 posted on 03/01/2007 9:09:43 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

Yes, yes, Professor, uh huh...

(holds chin and nods rapidly, wondering "what does he mean by that?")


22 posted on 03/01/2007 9:12:53 PM PST by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

Guilt - always dependable.

A constant companion, along with his buddy Resentment.


23 posted on 03/01/2007 9:14:49 PM PST by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

I was surprised Sunday night to see that, while An Inconvenient Truth won Best Documentary, the statue went to director Davis Guggenheim. During his thank you speech, Guggenheim let Al hold the statue. Tipper won't have to worry about dusting the Oscar. It's at the Guggenheims. All Al got was a photo op.

The Departed won Best Picture, Oscar going to Martin Scorsese, who won a second Oscar for Best Director. Does anyone think Leonardo DiCaprio won an Oscar because his movie was honored? At least he was nominated for his acting.


24 posted on 03/01/2007 11:34:21 PM PST by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: etradervic

The author needs an editor.


25 posted on 03/02/2007 4:50:17 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

Perhaps you could sell that line to a company that makes fortune cookies.


26 posted on 03/02/2007 4:58:45 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Vaclav Klaus: "A whip of political correctness strangles their voice")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: etradervic
Speaking of the 0.8C increase in tempeatures in the last century, did you know that the agencies that keep track of these global temperatures have been adjusting all of the older temperatures DOWN and the newer temperatures UP.

Here is a graph showing how much they have MANIPULATED the temperature trend - changing it by 0.5C - in other words, you can't even believe the numbers saying it is warming.


27 posted on 03/02/2007 5:01:15 AM PST by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: etradervic
Here is another good one, this is the UNADJUSTED US temperature record, showing that 1934, 1921, 1931 were the record temperatures, not every year that comes along as they are spinning it now.


28 posted on 03/02/2007 5:06:58 AM PST by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustDoItAlways

The global temperature has actually DECREASED since 1998.


29 posted on 03/02/2007 8:58:23 AM PST by etradervic (Newt in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: JustDoItAlways

The global temperature has actually DECREASED since 1998.


30 posted on 03/02/2007 8:58:24 AM PST by etradervic (Newt in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: secretagent
Besides models, their theory incorporates ice core studies, biological proxies, and standard principles of chemistry and physics.

Please. These people are not credible! Models and theories can be manipulated to yield whatever you would like. Their whole approach - "how to answer a skeptic" - demonstrates to anyone paying attention that they are not interested in science or truth; only the defense of their climate crisis scenario. Their approach is political, not scientific. I am not impressed.
31 posted on 03/02/2007 9:06:40 AM PST by etradervic (Newt in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: etradervic
"How to answer a skeptic" articulates their positions well for science-lite people like myself, and their motives don't matter to me. Just the boiled down facts for me, please.

Do you have any specific points you disagree with them on?

32 posted on 03/02/2007 9:18:49 AM PST by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

Ping.


33 posted on 03/02/2007 9:48:14 AM PST by Apple Blossom (...around here, city hall is something of a between meals snack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: etradervic
The temperature has gone down since 1998 according to the actual temperature records (thermometer readings for example) but not according to GISS which is the agency of record when it comes to global temperatures for the US.

According to GISS, 2005 was the warmest year (but of course 1934 actually was before they started playing with the data.) The Hadley Centre shows temperatures down but not James Hansen and the GISS.

http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/news/20070208/

34 posted on 03/02/2007 5:27:05 PM PST by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: westmichman

It's Punxsutawney, not Punxatawney. I assume you make reference to Al Bore, which is an insult to Phil.


35 posted on 03/02/2007 5:29:26 PM PST by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: etradervic

Everyone sign this petition.
http://patriotpetitions.us/StopGore/


36 posted on 03/02/2007 5:34:04 PM PST by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

How about marshmallows?


37 posted on 03/02/2007 5:39:37 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan

It appears that we have a waiting line to buy Algore's carbon credits. After all, somebody needs to pay for his heating his pool.


38 posted on 03/02/2007 7:58:50 PM PST by etradervic (Newt in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: etradervic

I've seen that said several times, and not just here. Is there a source for that?


39 posted on 03/04/2007 4:00:19 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: secretagent
"They said that warming in the "way back" caused an increase in CO2 which in turn caused more warming via GH effect, and that CO2 caused most of the "ultimate change"."

So what? It makes no difference. The increase of CO2 is still 95+% natural, or beyond the ability of man to stop it.

The change is still triggered by the sun, or by catastrophic events such as volcanic activity.
40 posted on 03/04/2007 4:45:02 AM PST by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson