Posted on 03/01/2007 7:05:06 AM PST by Calpernia
Trenton, New Jersey - Amid growing concern about child safety on the computer, New Jersey lawmakers are considering a measure to prohibit released sex offenders from using the Internet and to impose new rules for online dating sites.
"We're living in some very scary times," said senate president Richard J Codey, who is spearheading New Jersey's effort.
"No matter how much you trust your kids, no matter how much you think you know what they're doing, there are some sick people out there who will stop at nothing to prey on them."
No federal law imposes Internet restrictions on convicted sex offenders.
Florida and Nevada have laws imposing computer restrictions on sex offenders, but New Jersey's package would mandate five years in jail for released sex offenders caught using a computer to solicit a child.
It would also require online dating sites to tell New Jersey residents whether they do background checks.
The plan is to be considered soon by the state Senate, but already has raised constitutional questions. Internet companies like Yahoo!, AOL, eHarmony and Match.com are also concerned about the online dating rule.
Background checks 'unreliable'
Bill Ashworth, director of state government affairs at Yahoo!, said background checks are unreliable because of fraud and problems getting information from states with different laws on what information is available.
"Criminal background checks provide users of online dating with a false sense of security," he said. "The last thing we want users to do is let their guard down."
A 2000 US Department of Justice survey of youths ages 10 to 17 found that about one in five received a sexual solicitation or approach over the Internet in the prior year. The concern has prompted several states to take steps against child solicitation through the Internet.
Last year, Colorado banned any person from using a computer to talk to an unrelated child under age 15 without parental permission if the person if at least four years older than the child. Kansas and Oklahoma have made electronic solicitation of a child a crime.
Under the New Jersey proposal, convicted sex offenders would have to submit to periodic, unannounced examinations of their computer equipment, install equipment on their computer so its use could be monitored and inform law enforcement if they have access to a computer.
But Parry Aftab, a lawyer, author and executive director of WiredSafety.org, an online safety and education group based in Bergen County, New Jersey, said Internet restrictions for sex offenders may not survive a court challenge. She said the idea makes her "child protection hat conflict with my Internet privacy lawyer hat."
She said keeping sex offenders off the Internet would be difficult to enforce, but that monitoring equipment would help put people back in jail when they violate it.
I wonder how this would be enforced?
If someone is a known (convicted) sex offender and molester of children, s/he should be in prison to begin with. That would obviate the need for such unenforceable laws such as this.
What about public access computers at libraries? How would they check that? Require libraries to do background checks???
>>>It would also require online dating sites to tell New Jersey residents whether they do background checks.
That looks like a backdoor to:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1591390/posts
NJ Bill Would Prohibit Anonymous Posts on Forums...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1591081/posts
The problem of thin-skinned politicos (NJ bill to ban anonymous posting)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1589588/posts
NJ LEGISLATURE - ID of interactive computer services & Internet service
I wonder how long it will take the ACLU and the American Library Association to challenge this proposed law.
I think post 5 has something to do with this
100% agreed.
How dare you cloud the issue with logic and reason . . .
I know a guy who has to register as an SO for pissing on a dumpster. He runs an internet based business. This would devastate him and his family. This is NOT a good idea across the board. I could see it on a case-by-case basis though.
Even as a case by case basis, we all would have to submit to background checks to log on for random enforcement.
"I wonder how this would be enforced?"
First, I don't like biochips.
Having said this, this is a perfect opportunity to force chipping on us. Who could object to keeping child predators off the net?
Chip them and require that computers in public places have recievers in the keyboards, then later mandate recievers in all keyboards sold after a certain date.
We would all need to be chipped.
I don't think that's the way it shold be enfored, but you are probably right. We'll all have breathalyzer ignition lockouts in our cars before to long, too.
Gee, sounds just like China, Iran, or North Korea.
For the FReepers who think we must do everything to "Save the Children", think of this is the first step in a long process to eventually monitor everyone's computer use and make anonymous Internet use impossible. The Internet is a huge threat to liberal control of media and government.
Related, IMO:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1793294/posts
Rising STD rate sparks online dating sites
At first, just the designated Bad Guys would need chipping. Then keyboards, like I mentioned, but after that detector portals sould scan these villians as they try to enter a school or public library, or a serial drunk driver entering a liquor store, or a felon at a gun store.
Eventually we'd all be chipped, but it will start with these special classes, pedophiles, drunk drivers, felons, Republicans...then eventually all of us.
It's just too convenient for statists to ignore.
LOL.....That is easy to do......LOL.......How noble.:-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.