| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
| Locked on 02/28/2007 5:05:08 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 02/28/2007 4:36:48 PM PST by LibWhacker
Muslim cabbies refuse to bend in alcohol dispute
BLOOMINGTON: Dozens of Muslim cab drivers showed up for a hearing at a hotel near the Minneapolis-St Paul International Airport on Tuesday to protest against proposed penalties for cabbies who refuse service to passengers carrying alcohol.
“I am Muslim. I’m not going to carry alcohol,” Abdi Mohamed, a driver for Bloomington Cab, told a Metropolitan Airports Commission panel that gathered to hear public opinion on the proposals.
Commissioners are charged with setting a new policy by May, when airport licences for cab drivers are set to expire. Under the proposal, drivers who refuse service for any reason would have their licence suspended for 30 days. A second refusal would mean a two-year revocation of the licence.
According to airport officials, about 80 percent of their cabdrivers are Somali, who are predominantly Muslim. Last year, airport officials said alcohol-bearing passengers were being refused service an average of 77 times a month, though that figure dropped drastically after new airplane travel safety rules prohibited liquids in carry-on luggage.
In September, the commission proposed a compromise that would have let Muslim cabbies display a different-coloured light on their cab if they did not want to pick up passengers carrying alcohol.
But that proposal triggered a huge backlash, from both passengers and other taxi drivers who feared it would make travellers avoid taxis altogether. Soon the airport commission went the other direction, proposing the stiff penalties for cabbies who refuse service to alcohol-toting passengers.
“I don’t have a problem with people practising their religion,” said Douglas Bass of St Paul. “I don’t even have a problem with people who want everyone to believe what they believe. But I do have a problem when a majority is being forced to observe other religions and customs.”
The cabbies and their supporters left no doubt that they are not willing to bend on the alcohol issue.
Hassan Mohamud, a Muslim imam and adjunct law professor at William Mitchell College of Law, said the Muslim cab drivers are only trying to support their families, both here and in their strife-torn home country, and are being placed in an impossible situation.
Abdifatah Abdi, who said he is counselling cabdrivers on legal issues related to the controversy, warned commissioners that instituting the penalty would set off a long legal battle.
“This is a religious freedom issue, and it will not end here,” Abdi said. “It will go to the courts, even the Supreme Court. The drivers will not relinquish their rights to be protected under American law.” ap
There's nothing impossible about it. Nobody is forcing them to drive cabs; they can find jobs where their religious sensibilities aren't a factor. As long as they're signing on to be a public conveyence, they have to abide by the same rules as everyone else.
So refuse to license them. Cab drivers can't pick and choose who they want to carry.
They could always be a gypsy cab, ride outside the law and take their chances.
Passengers should carry pigs instead of alcohol.
See post 15, but like someone else said maybe cabs are regulated differently. On the surface, though, I think cab drivers should be able to drive whoever they want. If I was a driver and I saw someone who looked Muslim and was wearing a bulky jacket in the middle of summer I want the right to refuse service.
I seem to recall the same thing.
Yes, there are hypocrites here at FR.
See post 14
I searched. Don't blame me.
How about these guys not drive in a city that serves demon alcohol? Now that would be taking a stand... I think I'll suggest that ... :)
Agreed. And having an airport cab license is a privilege If you want the privilege of being able to pick up fares at the airport, you have to follow the rules that go with that privilege.
"PIGSKIN WALLET"
I like it!
Then you're not suppose to drive a taxi then...
Maybe the government should provide Camels for these dudes... give them routes in the desert lands of California.
Maybe they should find other employment that allows them to follow their religious fervor.
FYI
It's not the same as a restaurant.
First, if a cab doesn't advertise itself as one that discriminates, you won't know until you've wasted time to flag it down.
Second, they get a license from the city/airport to do special business. It's not even the same as a taxi on city streets.
I'm not familiar with the rules on this. Is having a airport cab license different than a regular cab license?
"it appplies to these cab drivewrs as well"
Then you wouldn't have a problem with the clients refusing to have a muslim driving their cab. It sounds like a goldmine for drivers who would advertise that they are NOT muslim.
Pull their hack license.
They can go back to Mecca and drive a cab there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.