Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani Accused Of 'Notorious Adultery' (flashback: June 21, 2002)
The Associated Press ^ | 6/21/02 | Unknown

Posted on 02/28/2007 12:38:31 PM PST by Ol' Sparky

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-202 next last
To: USS Alaska
You really need to get the facts straight before you go posting stuff like that.

Jane left Reagan. Because she was bored in the marriage.

To compare Reagan to Rudy in that aspect shows you disregard for facts.
41 posted on 02/28/2007 12:54:08 PM PST by JRochelle (SuperBowl MVP Peyton Manning is a Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers

Donna Hanover was also a liability for the mayor, as she opened her own office in Gracie Mansion and starred in "The Vagina Monologues." I'm not sure that the divorce was all his fault.


42 posted on 02/28/2007 12:54:30 PM PST by Revenge of Sith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

bump


43 posted on 02/28/2007 12:54:36 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Was Rudy's mistress on the government payroll (or working as a volunteer in his office)? Was Rudy sexuall propositioning coworkers (including using goons to bring women to his hotel room where he'd drop his pants and order them to "kiss it"?

No. But no one here is comparing him to Clinton.

Meanwhile Giuliani is still a notorious adulterer and would make a lousy president.

44 posted on 02/28/2007 12:54:45 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (When toilet paper is a luxury, you have achieved communism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
If character really matters, Rudy can not be the GOP nominee.

I'd rather him go down because he is wrong on most of the issues. That is the high ground and it should be taken.

45 posted on 02/28/2007 12:54:45 PM PST by frogjerk (If ignorance was bliss, liberals would be happy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
Is adultery only a relevant issue when it can be used to defeat Democrats?

I don't know. Why did the LA Times argue that Schwarzenegger was infit for Governor in 2003 because of an alleged grope 20 years earlier, but San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom shouldn't step down because of an affair with his campaigner manager's (and best friend's) wife?

Why was Rudy's divorce when mayor such a big deal, but Newsom's affair when mayor is not?

-PJ

46 posted on 02/28/2007 12:55:39 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fawn; All
Isn't she the one nut who did that outrageous play?

Yes MS. VAGINA MONOLOGUE DONNA HANOVER! She used Rudy's Mayor status to further her journalism and tv acting career and use all the perks she could to further that too.

Now I see she is not doing much better:
GIULIANI'S EX-WIFE BECOMES AN ONLINE LOVE AND SEX COACH...

Move over, Dr. Ruth and Dr. Judy: There's a new sex advice guru in town, and her name is - gulp - Donna Hanover.

The former first lady of New York has jumped headfirst into her new gig as AOL's love-and-sex coach, mincing few words as she dishes out tips to the lovelorn and the lustful.

47 posted on 02/28/2007 12:55:54 PM PST by areafiftyone (RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - STRENGTH AND LEADERSHIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

You know...you guys keep saying the media is pumping Giuliani up as the front runner, but then you start a gazillion threads a day about what a terrible guy he is.

You seem to be chasing him pretty hard....are you sure he isn't the front runner?


48 posted on 02/28/2007 12:56:06 PM PST by Skip Ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

Actually, one divorce for someone from Hollywood is pretty impressive...


49 posted on 02/28/2007 12:56:09 PM PST by frogjerk (If ignorance was bliss, liberals would be happy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

Good grief, not this again! You sound like every airheaded celebrity in 1998.

Nobody cared where Bill Clinton stuck his pecker. It's the fact that he lied about under oath.

Nice try, though. Thanks for treading that one out again.


50 posted on 02/28/2007 12:56:16 PM PST by Gunder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska
Do you know the facts of that divorce? She left him, was supposedly having an affair with Lew Ayres and Reagan was reported to be very upset by the whole thing.

Please do not compare him to Rudy Giuliani.
51 posted on 02/28/2007 12:56:59 PM PST by msnimje (Brian Camenker - The Right's own version of marKOS Moulitsas ZĂșniga of Daily Kos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

Notorious? Is in contrast to the "reputable adultery"? This is nothing but a hit piece by AP.


52 posted on 02/28/2007 12:57:46 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right; Ol' Sparky
If adultery was a legitimate reason to oppose Bill Clinton because it revealed his lack of character (and it was)

Then you'll need to run personal background checks on every single candidate on the ballot before you cast your vote.

It's a silly criteria, because the most prolific adulterer might be the one who's best at hiding it, and thus you'll never know whether you're voting for a hero or a cad.

That's a sorry position for you to be in as a voter.

53 posted on 02/28/2007 12:57:54 PM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
BREAKING NEWS... June 21, 2002

Gentlemen, synchronize your watches!

54 posted on 02/28/2007 12:58:39 PM PST by nctexan (Top 10 Presidential Reqs. for 2008 - see my homepage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve
"Notorious Adultery"?

Is there such a thing as "Honorable Adultery" or "Respectable Adultery"?


Serial Adulterer comes to mind. He was openly having an affair while still married to wife # 2.

This is Rudy's third marriage.

Will there be more???

If the Republican nominee does not get the endorsement of the Christian Right-wing base of the GOP, then Hello Pres. Hillary!

Rudy has no chance of winning the White House.

None.


55 posted on 02/28/2007 12:58:57 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (Warning. If your tagline is funny... I may steal it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

I think it was Notorious, because it was not well-concealed and discrete. It was "open and notorious." The papers openly reported on his relationships with Christine and Nathan.


56 posted on 02/28/2007 12:59:06 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

Defeating him with his record is sufficient.


57 posted on 02/28/2007 12:59:34 PM PST by labette ("Come,and let us reason together...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
Actually, one divorce for someone from Hollywood is pretty impressive...

And he was a good and devoted husband to both his wives.
58 posted on 02/28/2007 1:00:02 PM PST by msnimje (Brian Camenker - The Right's own version of marKOS Moulitsas ZĂșniga of Daily Kos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
I will not vote for Rudy , due to his lack of stand on certain issues but this in wrong IMO. I put adultery right up their with murder because a part of you dies but this is between him and his wife (ex). If he was having marital problems right now that could be an issue but as I said...this just doesn't seem right.
59 posted on 02/28/2007 1:00:45 PM PST by CindyDawg (Duncan Hunter.......shhh! You aren't supposed to know about him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

"Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us."

Same book as don't commit adultry?


60 posted on 02/28/2007 1:01:11 PM PST by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson