[samm1148]

Of course this guy's funding or the fact that he ever put gas in a car will be used against him. The church of global warming ideologues and their charlatanry is never called into question.

[neverdem]

"The politics of global warming" had a fair amount of science.

Inconvenient Truths - Novel science fiction on global warming.

NOT THAT SIMPLE - GLOBAL WARMING: WHAT WE DON'T KNOW

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.

[Jedi Master Pikachu]

ping.

[BIGLOOK]

Been following Tim Ball for a while now. There are others, researching climate, ice pack movements, ocean currents and temps for data pertinent to navigation and commerce. Problem is that they don't have the funding or media exposure of the Global Warming zealots and their indentured scientific community.

[TASMANIANRED]

AlGores utility bill at his Tnn Mansion was $30k last year.

[AZLiberty]

The other thing that you are seeing going on is that they have switched from talking about global warming to talking about climate change. The reason for that is since 1998 the global temperature has gone down -- only marginally, but it has gone down. In the meantime, of course, CO2 has increased in the atmosphere and human production has increased. So you’ve got what Huxley called the great bane of science -- “a lovely hypothesis destroyed by an ugly fact.” So by switching to climate change, it allows them to point at any weather event -- whether it’s warming, cooling, hotter, dryer, wetter, windier, whatever -- and say it is due to humans. Of course, it’s absolutely rubbish.

Next thing you know they'll be blaming Bush for global cooling.

[WOSG]

The theorized global warming is deemed a serious threat because of estimates assumptions that humans will create ever more CO2 emissions, eg, almost doubling our emissions in 40 years. The majority of those emissions come from power generation. If power generation emissions were to end, global warming as a serious threat would end.

A simple solution to stop global warming dead in its tracks is to make all new power generation off of nuclear power, and gradually replace all fossil-fuel-based generation of electricity with nuclear power. Nuclear power is safe, environmentally sound, economical and 100% emissions free.
If we did it in the US, we could save money, improve our balance of trade, and cut our emissions in half.

It's an obvious solution that costs the western world little (since nulcear power is no more expensive than fossil-fuel based power) except a commitment to pursue nuclear power.

The fact that global warming alarmists don't bring up this obvious solution is a good tipoff they have some other agenda.