Posted on 02/26/2007 1:46:53 AM PST by tomnbeverly
It's past time that we have some straight talk about Iraq and the War On Terror. The Democrats have caucused and agree that there is no military solution for Iraq and they believe that a political solution must start with a Redeployment of U.S. Troops out of Iraq.
Redeployment of Troops from Iraq has been alleged to be a loosing strategy. It has been said that the Democrats Rhetoric is not a plan for success.
So let’s talk about that re-deployment. Who Wins? Who Loses? Who Takes Responsibility? Time to refocus this debate:
Redeployment means millions of Iraqi's will die and their fledgling government will collapse. Re-deployment means that the region will become unstable and gas prices will be 6 dollars at the pump in the U.S. (talk about kitchen table issues) how's this one; Doesn't make alot of sense in raising the minimum wage, (WHEN YOU CAN'T AFFORD TO DRIVE TO WORK).
Redeployment means Iran gets Nuke weapons. Redeployment sets the stage for a new Cold War with Russia. Redeployment means that Al-Qaeda restarts terror training camps using Iraqi resources. Redeployment means the U.S. is more likely to lose thousands of CIVILIANS in terror attacks here on our soil. Redeployment emboldens terror groups and makes our fight in Afghanistan much harder.
Redployment causes the UN to reconsider their positions in helping with the War On Terror. Redeployment means 100,000 U.S. soldiers will die when we get sucked back into the regional civil war that will engulf the Middle East as it spills over to Europe because Europe is collapsing under the wave of Islamo-Nazis that are burning Jewish people alive in the streets.
So do we really want to redeploy at this point in history?
I wish others thought as clearly as you do.But then again,there are those on the left who went to the Neville Chamberlain school of appeasement.
From an historical perspective the Rats may well be the Chamberlains of the 21st century... One can only hope, because the alternative is that any future President will never be able to muster the political will to go after the Islamo Terrorists using military force. Imagine the Nuclear bomb that killed 50K Americans the President explains to America and the UN that we failed to see it coming (AGAIN) but we must act. Against who they will say. No state sponsors for Al-Qaeda or Hezbollah, or Islamic Jihad, or (Take your Pick). Believe me Bush has this one right and the Rats are on the wrong side of history... hopefully...
Thanks to rats controlling our education system, most students will think Neville Chamerlain is "Wilt's ne'er-do-well brother"...
Yep and that Saddam Hussein and Osama were the 44th President.
Thanks alot Mr. B. Hussein Obama.
Very good.
Thank you for posting this.
The Dims have never been real good at calculating consequences, especially when, in their mind, its always somebody else's fault, when things go bad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.