Posted on 02/24/2007 7:24:58 PM PST by Jeff Head
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
By Jeff Head - Last Update: February 24, 2007 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Throughout 2006 and into 2007 the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has continued its unprecedented modernization and buildup, adding two entirely new classes of major combatant warships to its inventory, along with the other twelve new classes they have been working on. Large numbers of new guided missile destroyers, guided missile frigates, fast attack craft, very modern and quiet diesel/electric attack submarines, nuclear attack submarines, nuclear ballistic missile submarines, logisitic support craft, amphibious assault craft, and the infrastructure and aircraft to support them are coming online and being trialed and tested at sea and in the air by the PLAN. The major new classes include the improved Type 054, or Ma'anshan guided missile frigates (FFG), called the Type 054A. These vessels represent a significant improvment of the first two frigates which had been launched and commissioned earlier. The craft appear to have a larger displacement and include a VLS system for their anti-air missiles. Two of these were built and launched in 2006 and the next two are nearing completion with a fifth and possibly a sixth already under construction. It is clear that these vessels will be produced in significant numbers, perhpas up to 25.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Two new modern and stealthy, Type 054A guided-missile frigates were launched with the 3rd, 4th, and 5th building. More than twenty are projected. The second new class introduced by the PLAN in 2006 was the Type 071 LPD, amphibious assault vessel. Similar to the US San Antonio Landing Platform Dock (LPD), this vessel is a very modern addition to the PLAN Amphibious fleet. it is thought that another vessel of this class may well be constructed in 2007, perhaps more. Displacing over 20,000 tons and including a well-deck for smaller amphibious assault craft, the vessel is also armed with 4 CIWS and a dual purpose main gun. The potential for an anit-air craft missile system, either VLS or cannister mounted is also included. Two to four helocoptors for air assault will aslo be embarked on the large flight deck.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() A new, large LPD amphibious assault vessel, Type 071, was built and launched in 2006 by the PLAN. Another significant and telling development in 2006 deals with the Aircraft carrier Varyag that has been being worked on and refitted in the Dalian Shipyards for the last three years. In 2006 the Chinese announced a deal with the Russians to acquire up to fifty SU-33 aircraft, which are the navalized and carrier capable versions of the Russian SU-27 aircraft (also in service with the Peeople's Republic. These are the same aircraft employed on the Russian carrier, Kuznetsov, which is the sister ship to the Varyag that, as mentioned, is now in the Chinese naval shipyard. In addition, the zinc chromate covering, which is a primer for a non-skid surface for aircraft on a carrier deck, has now been painted over with what appears to be a final dark grey non-skid surface. Both of these development are clear indications that the PLAN intends to launch and commission the Varyag as an operational Chinese carrier, probably within the next 24-36 months.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Also of particular note the PLAN took possesion of two improved Sovremenny class destroyers purchased from the Russians. These vessels represent the most modern upgrades to the Sovremenny class vessels available and were built entirely new, specifically for the PLAN. The Sovremenny class destroyers were designed by the Russians to operate in conjunction with other naval and air assets to locate and destroy super carriers such as those deployed by the US Navy.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Two new, improved Project 956, Hangzhou guided-missile destroyers been delivered to the PLAN, bringng to four the number of these carrier hunters in service. Finally, the PLAN commissioned a second new class replenishment ship, the Weishanhu 887, which is the second in the Qiandaohu class. The Qiandaohu 886 was commissioned in 2005. These represent new fleet replenshiment vessels that now join the four other replenishment vessels the PLAN has. The new ship conducted port visits with Chinese DDGs to Pakistan and India in 2006 and this represents a continued move on the PLAN's part toward blue water operations.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The new fleet replenishment vessel, the Weishanhu 887, was commissioned and joined the Qiandaohu 886 in 2006 and was promptly sent on port calls in the same year. More and more Stealth FAC Type 022s were being built throughout 2006 at multiple shipyards. It is not known exactly how many of these advanced, fast, and stealthy catamaran missile boats have been built, but estimates now range up well over twenty and perhaps as many as thirty. It is estimated that as many as 100 will be built.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Many more stealth catamaran FACs were built during 2006. In addition, the many other vessels and aircraft spoken of from this site's 2006 PLAN Update, continue to be integrated into PLAN operations ... By way of reference, in general numbers, over the last five to six years, the PLAN has built and launched over 80 new major surface combatants for its fleet. In that same time period, they have not decommissioned any major surface combatants, meaning they have added 80 major surface combatant vessels to their inventory. In that same period, the US Navy has built 46 new major surface combatants. At the same time, the US Navy has decommissioned 49 major surface combatants, many of them with 10-15 years of service life remaining, meaning a net loss of three major surface combatants in this period. Clearly the trend shows that the PLAN is rapidly closing the gap between itself and the US Navy, and particualrly when focusing on the Western Pacific, which is where the PLAN is concentrated, this is a trend worthy of watching and considering in future US Navy and other western nation's planning and acquisition schedules.
|
You may have heard of this gentleman already and may have read his stuff, but just in case, here's a link to an interview with Michael Pillsbury, a Pentagon advisor on China.:
http://www.taiwandc.org/wsj-2005-06.htm
Good to hear that. About time they did.
I had not heard of him...but would like to converse with him as I believe he and I are on the same wave length.
Right on. Those who don't learn from history will experience it once again. We're seeing japan 1941 all over again and once again the pols in DC are asleep at the switch. They should be FORCED to watch the movie PEARL HARBOR on a continuous loop rerun for a non-stop WEEK.
The islamofascists are only the "hitler/nazi" half of this modern axis of evil, the chi-coms are the other "tojo" half. Thus it will come about that they will build up their navy to such an extent that they will believe they can defeat the US Navy by overwhelming numbers alone.
Matching them with 20 century designs/thinking is a foolish waste of money on our part. No, the only way is a naval Star Wars techno-advance : ways of eliminating ANY surface ship or underwater sub in a flash. So, let them sink vast monies into their "modern" ships, then at the right moment demonstrate that they're junk on the bottom of the blue water ocean the minute after they enter it on a hostile mission. Sayonara tojo...
An off-the-wall idea of a hi-tech answer to making surface ships obsolete. Some years ago a guy(Discovery Channel Special)showed that bubbles coming up from the seafloor(methane outbursts)can indeed sink ships via loss of buoyancy. This was in a test tank, not out in the open ocean with a real ship.
But think : if you hit the WATER in front of a moving ship with a massive amount of BUBBLES, it would sink like a stone. You don't shoot at the ship at all...and once it's gone to Davy Jones Locker there's no trace left that anything happened...just a displaced ship, on the bottom.
Ok geniuses : satellite based microwaves, a field of CO2 canisters, anti-ship missiles that blow big HOLES in the water...how would you do it? Anyway, just an off-the-wall idea...
Great research on a very troubling build-up, Jeff. Thanks for the ping.
You are weclome my FRiend. It is a troubling issue...and it has been getting more so over the last three yers, partcularly as we have decommissioned so many good ships...and then sunk them.
Consider the Shanghai "Cooperation Organization" as a world war axis. Consider the SCO's overall pool of forces, logistics and capabilities.
We are like the UK, 1920something, and do not realize it. We stupidly believe in the 10 Year Rule (or even, the 20 Year Rule). Like the UK before us, our August 1940 moment awaits.
They have taken all the TQM, Deming, Kaizen, Demand Flow Manufacturing, FMEA, Design for Assembly and Automation, and various other advanced manufacturing and quality practices to heart. Even if they don't quite have the R&D nailed yet, their ability to execute makes them into what existed in Europe prior to the mid 30's when the Germans outsourced their arms build up to circumvent the Treaty of Versailles. In this case, the IP is Russian. Yet quite unlike the Dutch and Czechs of those old days, the Chinese are probably not so much the naive and gullible future victims but instead are part of the cabal of evil, sharpening their daggers to stick into the backs of the West, Japan and our other Asian allies. Even "Neutral" India needs to realize they are useful idiots and completely expendable after the balloon goes up.
We have a condition where a nation of 1.3 billion is on the verge of attaining and economic strength similar to that of Nazi Germany...and it took most of the rest of the civilized world at that time to put them down, and they were a relatively small nation that numbered in the scores of millions. If China, under its current governmental form, is allowed, and financed by us to reach a similar economic conditions...we are in for a very hard time.
And that is why I say that the threat is much greater than that of the 1930s and what then led to World War II.
If some of you had not seen it, here is a more general review of the PLAN's growth and shipbuilding in the last year. The overall site has much more, including a PLAN vs USN comparison by ship class.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.