Skip to comments.
American Armada Prepares To Take On Iran
The Telegraph (UK) ^
| 2-24-2007
| Damien McElroy
Posted on 02/23/2007 5:31:04 PM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-164 next last
To: blam
No doubt the Telegraph is privy to our top secret war plans, as all the British press seems to be.
21
posted on
02/23/2007 5:49:18 PM PST
by
Nachoman
(Tagline temporarily out of service.)
To: blam
We must launch a very intensive Air War against the islamic terrorist regime in Iran to destroy their nuclear facilities, their military infrastructures, their command and control centers, etc... The terrorist rulers in Tehran must broken and humiliated and they must learn once and for all that they are not going to control the Middle East.
PS: I am watching the History Channel right and they are talking about the 79 F-14 that the US sold to the Shah of Iran before the islamic revolution there. They were saying that after Khumaeini took power the Iranians could not launch missiles from the F-14 for some very mysterious reasons. According to the History channel documentary, some people believe that the American technicians who were in charge of maintaining the F-14's in Iran took with them the electronics that are capable of firing the missiles form the F-14's before they left Iran :)
22
posted on
02/23/2007 5:49:58 PM PST
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: advertising guy
nancy pullhosie "goin command" now that is a scary thought.
To: mad_as_he$$
Too late?! You surrendered before the battle begins. Shame on you. We must launch the Air War against the islamic terrorist regime in Iran and destroy everything called military infrastructure in that country.
24
posted on
02/23/2007 5:54:15 PM PST
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: mrmargaritaville
she used to be able to pick up quarters, now with her new eyes, she can bend em
25
posted on
02/23/2007 5:54:45 PM PST
by
advertising guy
(If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
To: Citizen Tom Paine
Please leave the military maneuvering and tactics to our military, do not express silly and uninformed military opinions.
26
posted on
02/23/2007 5:56:54 PM PST
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: Zeroisanumber
I understand your point. My primary concern is the safety of our troops; secondarily, the reaction at home and in Iran.
Personally, I'd like to kick Iran into 2007.
To: HoosierHawk
most of Iran wants to kick Iran into 2007......
28
posted on
02/23/2007 5:59:27 PM PST
by
advertising guy
(If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
To: blam
So the carriers are physically patrolling the water in the Straits or are the jets doing it? Kinda ballsy, if they are!
29
posted on
02/23/2007 6:01:28 PM PST
by
TheLion
(How about "Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement," for a change)
To: Robe
30
posted on
02/23/2007 6:02:54 PM PST
by
Robe
(Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
To: Citizen Tom Paine
Yes, but is there room for nuke subs to maneuver?
31
posted on
02/23/2007 6:07:02 PM PST
by
doc1019
(If Obama is elected as President, we will become an “Obama Nation”.)
To: advertising guy
Understood.
But how would they feel about an invading army?
To: HoosierHawk
she would flash em and have their babies ( non union of course)
33
posted on
02/23/2007 6:11:36 PM PST
by
advertising guy
(If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
To: HoosierHawk
sorry wrong reply........we have insiders with long pointing fingers ..it will be more like was expected in Iraq
34
posted on
02/23/2007 6:13:01 PM PST
by
advertising guy
(If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
To: TheLion
The CVs certainly do not enter the straits or the Persian Gulf.
To: jveritas
The Gulf is a tight little wading pool, but given the very limited Iranian naval capabilities, once we get the carriers in there, it's alright. The danger is taking them through the Straits. A surprise attack there would essentially be a live test of the effectiveness of the close-in weapons systems. Not a pleasant prospect.
We should take out the Iranian capacity, but I don't think we will.
36
posted on
02/23/2007 6:16:15 PM PST
by
Vicomte13
(Et alors?)
To: Strategerist
Thanks, I wouldn't have thought so.
37
posted on
02/23/2007 6:17:39 PM PST
by
TheLion
(How about "Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement," for a change)
To: HoosierHawk
But how would they feel about an invading army?
Irrelevant since there's not going to be an invading army.
Regardless of what a majority of people think in Iran, it's a huge country and there are millions of people, particularly less educated ones in the sticks, that have the guns and support the regime and would actively fight any sort of ground invasion.
To: Strategerist
Actually, we have sent CVN's right into the Gulf itself.
It's alarming, frankly.
Once they're in, it's ok, but passing through is a moment of vulnerability.
39
posted on
02/23/2007 6:18:42 PM PST
by
Vicomte13
(Et alors?)
To: Vicomte13
Please leave those military issues and tactics to the military. Do you think you know more than military on how to maneuver the US Navy into the Gulf region. People please go and eat some humble pie.
40
posted on
02/23/2007 6:28:47 PM PST
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-164 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson