Skip to comments.
Powerful X-ray machine debuts in Phoenix
AP via MSNBC ^
| 2/23/07
Posted on 02/23/2007 11:59:39 AM PST by paudio
MESA, Ariz. - A new X-ray machine for detecting weapons and explosives on airline passengers makes its debut today in Phoenix.
The so-called “backscatter” device will be used at one checkpoint in one terminal at Sky Harbor International Airport.
The machine visually strips off clothing, although a Transportation Security Administration spokesman says the image it projects looks more like a chalk drawing than a real person.
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: tsa; xray
Wow...
1
posted on
02/23/2007 11:59:44 AM PST
by
paudio
To: paudio
I see a lawsuit coming for irradiating people.
2
posted on
02/23/2007 12:02:18 PM PST
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: Lil'freeper
3
posted on
02/23/2007 12:02:40 PM PST
by
big'ol_freeper
(It looks like one of those days when one nuke is just not enough-- Lt. Col. Mitchell, SG-1)
To: paudio
Old technology...
4
posted on
02/23/2007 12:04:25 PM PST
by
Jaxter
("Vivit Post Funera Virtus")
To: paudio
"It's 100 percent voluntary, so if the passenger doesn't feel comfortable with it the passenger doesn't have to go through it," Melendez said.That's a relief. It's good to know terrorist bombers can "opt out".
5
posted on
02/23/2007 12:07:02 PM PST
by
BigBobber
To: paudio
Passengers not amused...
6
posted on
02/23/2007 12:08:11 PM PST
by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: paudio
7
posted on
02/23/2007 12:12:28 PM PST
by
red-dawg
To: massgopguy
Non-radiation workers can legally be exposed to fields of less than 2 millirem per hour (2x 10^-5 sievert).
The AS&E machine exposes people to much less than that, about what you'd get from sitting in the plane at 28,000 feet.
You'd have better luck suing a supermarket for zapping you with microwaves from the automatic door opener, or suing the airline for not providing a shielded cabin*.
ACLU will be all over this because of the perceived loss of privacy (wouldn't want someones private bomb (or stash) discovered).
*Look for Elle McPherson in the attachment to see how seriously some people take the airline radiation dose
http://www.acpsem.org.au/branch/wa/Newsletters/2003Jun.pdf
8
posted on
02/23/2007 12:22:06 PM PST
by
DBrow
To: BigBobber
I'm sure it's voluntary but if you refuse you get the full body cavity search. Airline travel just gets more and more appealing.
9
posted on
02/23/2007 12:39:55 PM PST
by
saganite
(Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
To: paudio
The name 'backscatter' is a little too New York for me.
10
posted on
02/23/2007 12:42:48 PM PST
by
Ieatfrijoles
(Incinerate Riyadh Now.)
To: paudio
Hmmm... I'm flying into PHX next month. I must make sure to check it out.
To: red-dawg
Now that's backscatter! ;^)
12
posted on
02/23/2007 12:47:24 PM PST
by
6ppc
(Call Photo Reuters, that's the name, and away goes truth right down the drain. Photo Reuters!)
To: paudio
Why not put it at Logan Airport in Boston? That's where all the hijackers got through with their box cutters.
13
posted on
02/23/2007 1:11:50 PM PST
by
D-Chivas
To: D-Chivas
What ARE you?
Some kind of PROFILER???
14
posted on
02/23/2007 1:53:39 PM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
To: red-dawg
ROTFLMOA
You owe me a new keyboard - post a warning next time!
Sensitive FLIR eh?
15
posted on
02/23/2007 3:49:18 PM PST
by
ASOC
To: saganite
"I'm sure it's voluntary but if you refuse you get the full body cavity search. Airline travel just gets more and more appealing.'
Or appalling...
16
posted on
02/23/2007 4:13:16 PM PST
by
gcruse
(http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
To: paudio
I'd wait for the machine capable of not merely "visually stripping", but of physically evaporating as well. Say, a perp shows with a bomb - stronger flash of light, and not only the perp, but his bomb, clothes and everything else about him atomizes into a foul-smelling mist, and is sucked out into an exhaust hood.
17
posted on
02/23/2007 5:14:12 PM PST
by
GSlob
To: paudio

Looks like Hillary is going to personally screen every passenger.
18
posted on
02/23/2007 7:09:25 PM PST
by
The Iceman Cometh
(Democrats In Control! (Where's my friggin' free stuff?))
To: massgopguy
I see a lawsuit coming for irradiating people.They, the TSA, had best hope and pray this does not come before my court. I see a huge violation of personal rights here. But, alas I shall keep my impartiality.
To: D-Chivas
Why not put it at Logan Airport in Boston? That's where all the hijackers got through with their box cutters. Ted Kennedy flies in an out of Boston, now think about the poor TSA employee looking at those x-rays. Hazard duty pay for sure, probably a nervous breakdown.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson