Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Powerful X-ray machine debuts in Phoenix
AP via MSNBC ^ | 2/23/07

Posted on 02/23/2007 11:59:39 AM PST by paudio

MESA, Ariz. - A new X-ray machine for detecting weapons and explosives on airline passengers makes its debut today in Phoenix.

The so-called “backscatter” device will be used at one checkpoint in one terminal at Sky Harbor International Airport.

The machine visually strips off clothing, although a Transportation Security Administration spokesman says the image it projects looks more like a chalk drawing than a real person.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: tsa; xray
Wow...
1 posted on 02/23/2007 11:59:44 AM PST by paudio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: paudio

I see a lawsuit coming for irradiating people.


2 posted on 02/23/2007 12:02:18 PM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lil'freeper

ping


3 posted on 02/23/2007 12:02:40 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (It looks like one of those days when one nuke is just not enough-- Lt. Col. Mitchell, SG-1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio
Old technology...


4 posted on 02/23/2007 12:04:25 PM PST by Jaxter ("Vivit Post Funera Virtus")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio
"It's 100 percent voluntary, so if the passenger doesn't feel comfortable with it the passenger doesn't have to go through it," Melendez said.

That's a relief. It's good to know terrorist bombers can "opt out".

5 posted on 02/23/2007 12:07:02 PM PST by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio
Passengers not amused...


6 posted on 02/23/2007 12:08:11 PM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gk5oJM-Zh7Q
7 posted on 02/23/2007 12:12:28 PM PST by red-dawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
Non-radiation workers can legally be exposed to fields of less than 2 millirem per hour (2x 10^-5 sievert).

The AS&E machine exposes people to much less than that, about what you'd get from sitting in the plane at 28,000 feet.

You'd have better luck suing a supermarket for zapping you with microwaves from the automatic door opener, or suing the airline for not providing a shielded cabin*.

ACLU will be all over this because of the perceived loss of privacy (wouldn't want someones private bomb (or stash) discovered).

*Look for Elle McPherson in the attachment to see how seriously some people take the airline radiation dose

http://www.acpsem.org.au/branch/wa/Newsletters/2003Jun.pdf
8 posted on 02/23/2007 12:22:06 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber

I'm sure it's voluntary but if you refuse you get the full body cavity search. Airline travel just gets more and more appealing.


9 posted on 02/23/2007 12:39:55 PM PST by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: paudio

The name 'backscatter' is a little too New York for me.


10 posted on 02/23/2007 12:42:48 PM PST by Ieatfrijoles (Incinerate Riyadh Now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Hmmm... I'm flying into PHX next month. I must make sure to check it out.


11 posted on 02/23/2007 12:43:16 PM PST by I_like_good_things_too (Don't make perfect the enemy of the good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: red-dawg

Now that's backscatter! ;^)


12 posted on 02/23/2007 12:47:24 PM PST by 6ppc (Call Photo Reuters, that's the name, and away goes truth right down the drain. Photo Reuters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Why not put it at Logan Airport in Boston? That's where all the hijackers got through with their box cutters.


13 posted on 02/23/2007 1:11:50 PM PST by D-Chivas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D-Chivas

What ARE you?

Some kind of PROFILER???


14 posted on 02/23/2007 1:53:39 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: red-dawg

ROTFLMOA

You owe me a new keyboard - post a warning next time!


Sensitive FLIR eh?


15 posted on 02/23/2007 3:49:18 PM PST by ASOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: saganite

"I'm sure it's voluntary but if you refuse you get the full body cavity search. Airline travel just gets more and more appealing.'

Or appalling...


16 posted on 02/23/2007 4:13:16 PM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: paudio

I'd wait for the machine capable of not merely "visually stripping", but of physically evaporating as well. Say, a perp shows with a bomb - stronger flash of light, and not only the perp, but his bomb, clothes and everything else about him atomizes into a foul-smelling mist, and is sucked out into an exhaust hood.


17 posted on 02/23/2007 5:14:12 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Looks like Hillary is going to personally screen every passenger.

18 posted on 02/23/2007 7:09:25 PM PST by The Iceman Cometh (Democrats In Control! (Where's my friggin' free stuff?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
I see a lawsuit coming for irradiating people.

They, the TSA, had best hope and pray this does not come before my court. I see a huge violation of personal rights here. But, alas I shall keep my impartiality.

19 posted on 02/25/2007 8:14:30 AM PST by thiscouldbemoreconfusing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: D-Chivas
Why not put it at Logan Airport in Boston? That's where all the hijackers got through with their box cutters.

Ted Kennedy flies in an out of Boston, now think about the poor TSA employee looking at those x-rays. Hazard duty pay for sure, probably a nervous breakdown.

20 posted on 02/25/2007 8:16:39 AM PST by thiscouldbemoreconfusing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson