Skip to comments.
Warplanes: Fighters Threatened by Cheap Robots
Strategy Page ^
| Feb 20, 2007
Posted on 02/20/2007 4:49:09 PM PST by John Jorsett
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: John Jorsett
fascinating. bump for later reading.
2
posted on
02/20/2007 4:50:24 PM PST
by
Kevmo
(The first labor of Huntercles: Defeating the 3-headed RINO)
To: John Jorsett
Whole new meaning for "death from above". Gotta love it.
3
posted on
02/20/2007 4:53:14 PM PST
by
David Isaac
(Duncan Hunter '08)
To: John Jorsett
When will SkyNet become self-aware?
To: John Jorsett
Sounds great untill you are up against a technically advanced opponent. Equip the ECM on a fighter with a jammer capable of significantly downgrading the remote signal and the drone is/will be destroyed. Then where is the air force?
5
posted on
02/20/2007 4:56:44 PM PST
by
Fraxinus
(My opinion worth what you paid.)
To: John Jorsett
6
posted on
02/20/2007 4:58:42 PM PST
by
M203M4
To: John Jorsett
You can see a squad of these flying in ahead of F-22's over Taharan. "Shock & Awe".
7
posted on
02/20/2007 4:59:09 PM PST
by
Recon Dad
(Marine Spec Ops Dad)
To: Fraxinus
Sounds great untill you are up against a technically advanced opponent. Equip the ECM on a fighter with a jammer capable of significantly downgrading the remote signal and the drone is/will be destroyed. Then where is the air force?If it were my design, it would be using spread spectrum and directed-beam techniques to defeat jamming attempts. I have to assume that the actual designers did something like that.
8
posted on
02/20/2007 4:59:44 PM PST
by
John Jorsett
(scam never sleeps)
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
"When will SkyNet become self-aware?" This is the first thought I have every time I read or hear one of these stories. The new Battlestar Galactica is a very dark program as well. Sooner or later it's going to happen and the "I, Robot" rules aren't going to apply to the brave new world we are going to create.
9
posted on
02/20/2007 4:59:45 PM PST
by
GBA
(God Bless America!)
To: John Jorsett

Boeing X45.
Regards.
10
posted on
02/20/2007 5:03:09 PM PST
by
ARE SOLE
(Agents Ramos and Campean are in prison at this very moment.)
To: GBA
I keep telling anyone that will listen...
You want to make an invincible armed force? Put any robotic plane, combat machine, ship, tank, vehicle etc. in the hands of Xbox Live users that have mastered the training and competition on the equivilent video game.
Our couch warriors would be the most brutal, ruthless and skilled army of all time.
To: John Jorsett
it would be using spread spectrum and directed-beam techniques to defeat jamming attempts.These will make building an effective jammer more difficult (larger? and more expensive), but not impossible. They are currently beyond the capabilities of those our military is most likely to be fighting. China would be another story, however, war with China is several years off, if that ever happens (hope and pray no war).
12
posted on
02/20/2007 5:07:11 PM PST
by
Fraxinus
(My opinion worth what you paid.)
To: Fraxinus
I suspect the Islamic War is the proving ground for systems that will be employed, probably sooner rather than later, in the wider World War that will involve Russia and China.Chinese and Russian systems will get their tests when the direct clash with Iran comes.
13
posted on
02/20/2007 5:13:49 PM PST
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
14
posted on
02/20/2007 5:14:17 PM PST
by
WorkingClassFilth
("Don't tread on me" - the motto of Patriots. "May I lick your boots?" - the motto of too many "R"s.)
To: Fraxinus
These will make building an effective jammer more difficult (larger? and more expensive), but not impossible.I worked on a program that used spread spectrum. We calculated that an effective jammer would require multi-megawatts of power to overwhelm our system. And if somebody had managed to come up with such a jammer, we'd have widened our band so that they'd have needed hundreds of megawatts. And that's assuming they could have detected us in the first place. Good SS signals hide among the noise. I'm not claiming that a capable adversary couldn't jam a UAV's signals, but I suspect it would be more reliable and cost-effective to send a fighter or missile up to destroy it.
15
posted on
02/20/2007 5:22:52 PM PST
by
John Jorsett
(scam never sleeps)
To: John Jorsett
I'm waiting for the Dominators to come on line. I can't wait to fill the skies over a city with hundreds or even thousands of cheap, disposable hunter-killers.
16
posted on
02/20/2007 5:27:42 PM PST
by
denydenydeny
("We have always been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be detested in France"--Wellington)
To: John Jorsett
I was thinking more along the lines of ECM pod that would help to make the UAV a much easier target for manned aircraft. A ground based system would only render the craft unmanouverable while it was within it's zone of influence, once outside of the zone of influence if it can re-synch with control station, it can then return home unimpaired. I do know that the simplest autopilot systems can easily fly straight and level, in calm air.
17
posted on
02/20/2007 5:36:14 PM PST
by
Fraxinus
(My opinion worth what you paid.)
To: PittsburghAfterDark
and will be easily corrupted if ruskies introduce them to a live woman
18
posted on
02/20/2007 5:49:18 PM PST
by
Flavius
(Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: ARE SOLE
Unfortunately the X-45A (pictured) and its successor (J-UCAS) have been scrapped by the USAF to provide funds for F-22 and other pet rocks.
The USAF is yet to reconcile itself to large UAVs
19
posted on
02/20/2007 6:45:05 PM PST
by
Starwolf
To: John Jorsett
Reaper.... that is a good name for such a angel of death. Happy hunting USA Reapers! I hope you speed many a bad guy on his quest of his dreamed of paradise.
20
posted on
02/20/2007 6:51:27 PM PST
by
FreeAtlanta
(Search for Folding Project - Join FR Team 36120)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson