Skip to comments.
Ariz. to still allow racist images on trucks
MSNBC ^
| 02/15/2007
Posted on 02/20/2007 12:26:19 PM PST by Responsibility2nd
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-153 next last
Pickaninny???
I've seen more than just a few mud-flaps with the silhouettes of naked women, but I don't ever recall any p-words.
Must get out more.
To: Responsibility2nd
How do you know the women are nekkid?
2
posted on
02/20/2007 12:27:47 PM PST
by
ichabod1
("Liberals read Karl Marx. Conservatives UNDERSTAND Karl Marx." Ronald Reagan)
To: Responsibility2nd
Same here. I had to go look it up.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pickaninny
3
posted on
02/20/2007 12:27:55 PM PST
by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: Responsibility2nd
I like people to have rascist things on their trucks or clothing.
Makes them easier to spot.
The bigots that cause problems are the ones you can't spot and who say all the right things, like the Democrat leadership.
4
posted on
02/20/2007 12:27:59 PM PST
by
MeanWestTexan
(Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
To: Responsibility2nd
I think they should ban bupper stickers.
Why not go all out to violate our right of free expression, why stop? /s
5
posted on
02/20/2007 12:28:19 PM PST
by
Perdogg
To: Responsibility2nd
No bias in that headline, no siree!
6
posted on
02/20/2007 12:28:47 PM PST
by
CFC__VRWC
(Go Gators! NCAA Football and Basketball Champions!)
To: Responsibility2nd
Hey, I'm offended when I see the naked women on trucks. But I also support the truckers' right to offend me.
I also support my right to boycott whatever company the truck belongs to, if any. ;-)
7
posted on
02/20/2007 12:29:49 PM PST
by
The Blitherer
(What the Devil is keeping the Yanks? Duncan Hunter for President '08!)
To: Responsibility2nd
And the question always is - WHO GETS TO DEFINE HATE SPEECH and subsequently what to ban...
8
posted on
02/20/2007 12:29:56 PM PST
by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: Responsibility2nd
I had to go look pickaninny up. I thought it meant a bunch of kids that roamed the streets. I didn't know it was racial.
9
posted on
02/20/2007 12:30:21 PM PST
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Responsibility2nd
"I personally am tired of explaining to my 11-year-old son why they (women) are depicted on mud flaps, but not all women are 36Ds. He's very confused by that," Ulmer said.If that confuses him, maybe you should cut back on his Ritalin dose.
10
posted on
02/20/2007 12:30:30 PM PST
by
CFC__VRWC
(Go Gators! NCAA Football and Basketball Champions!)
Looks like 1st Ammendment squeeked by once again.
11
posted on
02/20/2007 12:30:46 PM PST
by
usnret99
(I served! Have You? Would You?God Bless You!)
To: Responsibility2nd
"Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Gilbert, opposed the amendment, saying it probably violated First Amendment protections for free speech...."
If a judge can somehow come to the conclusion that the first amendment allows you to walk around on public streets with no clothes, like I think one state judge in Maryland or Connecticut did, than surely this would fall under the first amendment.
12
posted on
02/20/2007 12:31:28 PM PST
by
NapkinUser
(Free Ramos and Compean! Disbarment for the Nifong-wannabe Johnny Sutton.)
To: MeanWestTexan
Exactly. The KKK slowly morphed and blended into today's Democrat party. It's not easy to tell, but its there. And by KKK I don't just mean Sheets Byrd.
To: Responsibility2nd
"but not all women are 36Ds. He's very confused by that" Every young man comes to this realization some sad day.
14
posted on
02/20/2007 12:31:34 PM PST
by
avg_freeper
(Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
To: 2banana
WHO GETS TO DEFINE HATE SPEECH That's easy. John McCain and the Democrat party get to define what speech is protected under the first amendment.
15
posted on
02/20/2007 12:31:59 PM PST
by
highimpact
(Abortion is a voluntary human sacrifice at the altar of convenience.)
To: ichabod1
The best I can come up with on short notice...
Just using my imagination....
16
posted on
02/20/2007 12:32:12 PM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(Warning. If your tagline is funny... I may steal it.)
To: Responsibility2nd
Democratic Rep. Ben Miranda of Phoenix voted for the amendment but said he did so only because he felt compelled to do so because a vote against it could be misconstrued.Idiot!
17
posted on
02/20/2007 12:32:29 PM PST
by
Onelifetogive
(I don't have to show you no stinkin' tagline!)
To: Responsibility2nd
Their eleven year-old son is confused about women not all being 36-D's because of truck mudflaps? If that is the case, then the first time he sees a Playboy he is going to go stark raving mad.
I swear sometimes I think the human race as a whole is completely helpless, now, way past the point of no return. No one is safe, we're all at risk unless we pass more stupid laws. We deserve to be annihilated by aliens.
To: Responsibility2nd
Har! I guess it's better that the scumbag Democrats are busying themselves with idiotic crap like "splash guards" rather than pushing tax hikes and gun bans, etc.
To: Responsibility2nd
Another example of some fools trying to enforce the little known right to not be offended.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-153 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson