Skip to comments.
Bolton, "Bush's Compromise with N. Korea , a Sad Development" (interview w/ Chosun Ilbo)
Chosun Ilbo ^
| 02/16/07
| Huh Yong-bum
Posted on 02/17/2007 3:02:10 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: TigerLikesRooster
Can you comment on the current state of Kim's health that might mean the agreement will be short lived simply because of his death?
21
posted on
02/17/2007 5:49:38 AM PST
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. Want a stress free life? vote Republican..)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Bolton is right, yes; when has North Korea lived up to any agreement it ever made?
22
posted on
02/17/2007 5:50:24 AM PST
by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help m)
To: DB
The deal won't last. NK will get one or two shipments of N6 oil, then do something stupid.
How many times have we been down this road ?
To: TigerLikesRooster
Bolton is correct. Newt Gingrich said this as well. This reminds me too much of another deal we made with N. Korea.
24
posted on
02/17/2007 6:14:51 AM PST
by
alicewonders
(I like Duncan Hunter for President - 2008!)
To: joebuck
Bolton may very well be right, but it seems a bit disloyal to undercut Bush when the President was so totally loyal to him and fought hard on his behalf. Dubya, appointed him because he wanted his advice and respected his judgement. John Bolton has always been candid and honest with the press and the rest of the world, its why hes not liked.
In my opinion Bolton's statement on this deal is absolutely in character. Alot of us support Dubya, but we speak out when he's wrong, Thats not disloyal in fact its the highest form of loyalty , maintaining integrity
25
posted on
02/17/2007 6:21:04 AM PST
by
Kakaze
(Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing.....except not doing it sooner!)
To: joebuck
I disagree about any loyalty shown to Bolton by the White House.
26
posted on
02/17/2007 6:22:20 AM PST
by
i_dont_chat
(I have the right to offend. You can take offense or not.)
To: edradour
This account has been banned or suspended
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
28
posted on
02/17/2007 6:58:25 AM PST
by
panaxanax
(Ronald Reagan would vote for Duncan Hunter!)
To: bert
Re #21
It is possible. Actually, I think that the chance of N. Korean regime imploding in a couple of years is not small. However, it is not something we can control. There is equal or more chance that he and his regime could outlast Bush administration.
We are not in control of events with regard to N. Korea. Unless we prevail decisively in Iraq and Iran, we are left to sitting around and hoping that some serious cracks developing all over N. Korean regime would actually lead to wholesale collapse "in time."
Timing is the key here and we are no longer in control of timing, I fear.
29
posted on
02/17/2007 7:15:39 AM PST
by
TigerLikesRooster
(kim jong-il, kae jong-il, chia head, pogri, midget sh*tbag)
To: TigerLikesRooster
True Love Knows No Border
30
posted on
02/17/2007 9:10:10 AM PST
by
TigerLikesRooster
(kim jong-il, kae jong-il, chia head, pogri, midget sh*tbag)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I think we seeing replay of what happen during Clinton adminisation
31
posted on
02/17/2007 10:20:54 AM PST
by
SevenofNine
("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
To: gogogodzilla
You obviously don't realize the importance of North Korea to the Defense Industry. If you want to be driving some P'yongyang made Hyndai in 5 years then let the regime fall.
But with that Regime in Place, there is going to be a "Made in the USA missile defense shield", and a lot of Americans Stationed in Japan and the ROK keeping an Eye on the DPRK.
Bush has done a great thing by letting the DPRK keep it's nukes, and long range missiles. This is good for business, and you should appreciate that a President is getting America back to work.
32
posted on
02/17/2007 12:14:25 PM PST
by
Weinburger
(Macarthur & Patton in '48)
To: Weinburger
I'll take that as sarcasm, I hope.
33
posted on
02/17/2007 7:38:50 PM PST
by
gogogodzilla
(Republicans only win if they are conservative.)
To: Eclectica
"Bolton said pretty much the same thing on the Glenn Beck Program Thursday. " Thanks. I see that a podcast/mp3 is available at his site: http://www.glennbeck.com/audio/
34
posted on
02/17/2007 8:25:19 PM PST
by
endthematrix
(Both poverty and riches are the offspring of thought.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Talk softly but carry a big stick doesn't work when the Rats burn the stick.
Pray for W and Our Troops
35
posted on
02/17/2007 8:27:17 PM PST
by
bray
(Redeploy to Tehran)
To: TigerLikesRooster
SPOT ON CORRECTI don't know HOW they are going to sell this to the American People. Bushbots (who might otherwise criticize a Clinton Administration had they pulled this kind of stunt) may uncritically bite the baited hook. Not me.
You ought to see the Japanese domestic analysis of this <>AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY FAILURE. Even North Korea celebrated their victory yesterday in the six party talks, just in time for Korean New Years, over Pyongyang Radio (monitored in Japan).
To: TigerLikesRooster
Want to see change? Bolton for Secretary of State.
37
posted on
02/28/2007 10:27:05 AM PST
by
dervish
("To fight for King and Country is to fight for the future.But a barren society has no future" Steyn)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson