Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Call (Editor of New Republic Take On House Non-Binding Vote)
Wall Street Journal ^ | 16 February 2007 | MARTIN PERETZ Editor New Republic

Posted on 02/16/2007 6:13:53 AM PST by shrinkermd

....Where, then, are we in the war? No one knows exactly what to do about it. Everybody knows that we are in trouble. Even those of us who are skeptical about the ideological inclinations of many Democrats cannot but dignify the national anxiety that they represent.

The House is now debating a nonbinding resolution supporting our troops already in Iraq and disapproving the dispatch of 20,000 more. The debate is, strategically speaking, pointless: The new troops are already on their way.

...But the formula that the House Democratic leadership has fixed on is a charade. It allows each of the 435 representatives five minutes at the podium, enough for them to posture for local television but not so much that anybody can say anything serious, let alone deep or even brave. And the resolution's text itself is rather cowardly. For, since it purports to be a declaration of support for American soldiers actually fighting in Iraq -- whatever "support" actually means -- why does it criticize the only help that can possibly enable the military in the war: more soldiers and more weapons? And, if the Democrats do not want the war to be continued, then they should bring forth legislation either cutting funds or setting a date for withdrawal, in the manner of George McGovern. There is no rationale for troops in terrible danger to be held hostage to the political expediency of nervous Democrats, who are not prepared to do what they really mean to do and to say what they really mean to say.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: house; nonbinding; vote
A long editorial of which I have excerpted only a small amount. The editorial is done by the Senior Editor of the New Republic. It demonstrates some liberals still are capable of reason.
1 posted on 02/16/2007 6:13:54 AM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

My take on this whole thing is as you stated. It's a chance for them to get in front of the camera's. Since it is non-binding, all they had to do was write a letter and send it to the President with all the signatures on it. What they have done now is shut down our Government so they can focus on themselves. Don't they have anything else to do? If not, we don't need them.


2 posted on 02/16/2007 6:25:30 AM PST by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
A resolution that even cuts and runs from its stated intent to cut and run. Shameless!
3 posted on 02/16/2007 6:41:58 AM PST by .cnI redruM (Al Gore - as wrong about science as the man who condemned Galileo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Back in 1972, Marty Peretz was a McGovern supporter. Seems he's matured.


4 posted on 02/16/2007 7:46:58 AM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Image hosted by Photobucket.com NON-binding = political masturbation...
5 posted on 02/16/2007 8:02:42 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

---excellent post--


6 posted on 02/18/2007 7:07:02 AM PST by rellimpank (-don't believe anything the MSM states about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson