The 'Rats new "rock star" is among the biggest supporters of infanticide in the country.
1 posted on
02/15/2007 5:23:46 PM PST by
wagglebee
To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; Mr. Silverback; narses; 8mmMauser
2 posted on
02/15/2007 5:24:21 PM PST by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
Obama, Rick Warren Promote Purpose-Driven Condom
http://www.scrappleface.com/?p=2417
That's satire of course, but you'd think some Democrat, somewhere and more "Republicans" would decide to appeal to decency, modesty and abstinence.
Instead,
(nothing but crickets chirping)
3 posted on
02/15/2007 5:31:28 PM PST by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
To: wagglebee
Hillary is going to be the nominee, though- she's 25 points ahead of Obama. And she's just as pro-abortion as he is I'm sure. I wish they would attack her as well.
4 posted on
02/15/2007 5:32:30 PM PST by
MittFan08
(Anybody but McCain)
To: wagglebee
Since when is "fifty or so" protesters called a "handful"?
Certainly not at any Republican event. It would be scores, or dozens or throngs or some inflated number.
It's been what, 4-5 days since he announced, and this is the first this news junkie has seen any reference to any dissenters
5 posted on
02/15/2007 5:32:38 PM PST by
digger48
To: wagglebee
So when did FIFTY become a 'handful'.
Oh how the mighty media spins.
6 posted on
02/15/2007 5:34:05 PM PST by
OldFriend
(Swiftboating - Sinking a politician's Ship of Fools by Torpedoes of Truth)
To: wagglebee
Doesn't he say he is a committed "Christian"?
Something doesn't add up.
7 posted on
02/15/2007 5:34:17 PM PST by
BenLurkin
To: wagglebee
He is definitely one of the worst. Voting against the born alive protection act is worse than voting against the partial birth abortion bill.
What he seems to be saying, in his nice, polite way, is that he'd rather let a live baby die than risk offending the feminists.
In fact, as an article pointed out here a few weeks ago, he may have voted against this bill because his church runs a hospital that practices live birth abortions, and he didn't want to offend his supporter the abortionist pastor of that church. In other words, it was all about money.
9 posted on
02/15/2007 5:36:24 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: wagglebee
11 posted on
02/15/2007 7:31:52 PM PST by
God luvs America
(When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
To: wagglebee
Obama does't seem to mind the "savaging" of tiny innocent lives in the US or the "savaging" of innocent Shi'ite lives under Saddam and his sons in Iraq.
12 posted on
02/15/2007 8:51:49 PM PST by
syriacus
(30,000 Americans died, in 30 months, to release South Korea from Kim Il-sung's tyranny.)
To: wagglebee
13 posted on
02/15/2007 11:14:44 PM PST by
endthematrix
(Both poverty and riches are the offspring of thought.)
To: wagglebee
>>
Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) spoke on the measure on the Senate floor, saying, “I, as being a pro-choice senator on this side, representing my colleagues here, have no problem whatsoever with this amendment..." One easily deduces that the amendment was stupid, useless, obnoxious or all three.
15 posted on
02/16/2007 7:03:22 AM PST by
T'wit
(Visitors: the good news is, lots of people have agreed with you. The bad news is, they were Nazis.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson