Skip to comments.
Giuliani Says He Is Running for President in ’08 [And criticized our President on Iraq.]
New York Times ^
| 15FEB07
| RICHARD PÉREZ-PEÑA
Posted on 02/14/2007 10:13:40 PM PST by familyop
. . . and, without mentioning President Bush by name, offered pointed criticism on how the Iraq war has been handled . . . He said that the United States went to war with far too few forces and was wrong to dismantle Saddam Husseins military and government, and he conceded that if more information had been available about Iraqs weapons, Congress never would have approved the war.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: antiitalian; benito; charlatan; fake; fraud; generalissimo; giuliani; iraq; nomilitaryexperience; partysplitter; phony; rudywhopseudocon; snakeoilsalesman; trueconservatives; usingnytimes2attack; zerocorevalues; zerocredibility
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-105 last
To: Corin Stormhands
Not quite. I got to the point that I was willing to vote for him if he got the nomination and if he ran on the WoT and government reform. But he's been lying and weaseling in ways that would make a Clinton proud.
He claims he's a strict constructionist that would appoint judges like Scalia and Roberts - but his judge appointments in NYC don't reflect this.
He says the 2nd Amendment is about hunting and guns should be "regulated" according to the 2nd amendment. A "strict constructionist" would know that the 2nd Amendment ain't about hunting and that a "well regulated militia" means a well-equipped militia.
He says that he can't support banning partial birth infanticide unless there a provision for "life of the mother." That is weasely BS - PBA is never about the life of the mother.
And Guiliani, who made NYC into a "sanctuary city," said we need a "high-tech" (i.e. "virtual" meaning nonexistent) wall on the border.
He's a pro-abortion, pro-gun control, pro-pervert, pro-illegal. Some of his mayoral record (crime and government reform) is good; and maybe he'll fight the WoT (dunno how - he hasn't said much), but he isn't running on these items. He should be running as a Democrat. A liberal willing to fight the WoT and cut government bureaucracy and waste would be a welcome change from the ones running now.
To: zarf
No. Actually it's a simply stated fact. Can you refute it?
102
posted on
02/15/2007 8:09:23 AM PST
by
EternalVigilance
("With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?")
To: Sir Francis Dashwood
LOL.....so you think George Will is influenced by his paycheck?....You don't know George Will apparently. He is a Pulitzer Prize winner who speaks his own conservative mind and has done so for many years.....Do you think Alan Colmes on Hannity and Colmes is influenced by his paycheck from Fox News?.....apparently not.....You are just grasping at straws now....
To: NorCalRepub
You don't know George Will apparently. He is a Pulitzer Prize winner...Wow, I am impressed...
To: Sir Francis Dashwood
You are a liberal shilling for a liberal. LOL. Your ignorance and foolishness is impressive. I hope you are more accurate in your professional life.
105
posted on
02/15/2007 12:40:05 PM PST
by
Maynerd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-105 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson