To: ml/nj
I asked this on another thread. Given that Rudy has proclaimed himself to be "more pro-immigrant" than any other contenders, and has opposed anti-illegal immigrant legislation, why should we expect him to protect our borders as part of national security?
17 posted on
02/13/2007 11:02:47 AM PST by
william clark
(DH4WH - Ecclesiastes 10:2)
To: william clark
Given that Rudy has proclaimed himself to be "more pro-immigrant" than any other contenders, and has opposed anti-illegal immigrant legislation, why should we expect him to protect our borders as part of national security?Link, please.
19 posted on
02/13/2007 11:06:22 AM PST by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: william clark
why should we expect him to protect our borders as part of national security? Because that will be his job, that's why.
ML/NJ
23 posted on
02/13/2007 11:10:17 AM PST by
ml/nj
To: william clark
Given that Rudy has proclaimed himself to be "more pro-immigrant" than any other contenders, and has opposed anti-illegal immigrant legislation, why should we expect him to protect our borders as part of national security? "...and has opposed anti-illegal immigrant legislation,..." I was not aware of this. When did he "oppose" it? What did he say? Can you give me some quotes? I would like them in context please. Thanks.
62 posted on
02/13/2007 11:34:23 AM PST by
mc5cents
(Show me just what Mohammd brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson