Replies

"Number 1 on my list is the WOT"

The war on terror is important, however that's the ONLY positive Rudy has , as I see it. As far as the current front in the WOT (Iraqi), it will likely be decided before the next election. We will be on our way out...

If our homeland is attack again big time, the WOT won't even be a republican issue. Either party will strike back. A democrat may even be tougher than a republican, since he or she would have a freer hand to respond.

I would caution you not to sacrifice your conservative ideals for the WOT. It's not a republican war, and the only reason the democrats are against it is because they are superficially against anything Bush is for. If the democrats had been in power when the Towers came down, there would still have been a war on terror.

I'm sorry, but I am not that all sure that there would have been a WOT with the Democraps in power. Didn't they have enough provocation to act during WJC's tenure. They did have enough to act on Kosovo without a UN resolution and with the promise that the troops would be home for the coming Christmas. I know they are still there.

I think it is a very ify proposition to speculate on anything the Democraps would do. I do know what Rudy did in 1995 with Arafat and in 2001 with the "pile". The WOT is still the #1 decider in my book. Heck! If I thought that Wesley Clark would do better in the WOT, I would be tempted to vote for him.

With kindest regards.

Tom