Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/11/2007 12:44:58 PM PST by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: areafiftyone
Lord have mercy on me if I ever believed that any politician has what I need; the barter price of it would be my conscience and soul.

41 posted on 02/11/2007 1:08:42 PM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Rudy Giuliani Has Got What You Need

LOL--not hardly...

45 posted on 02/11/2007 1:12:52 PM PST by WalterSkinner ( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
How about anyone other than Rudy and Hitlery? Then those pesky social issues can be addressed.
46 posted on 02/11/2007 1:13:51 PM PST by beltfed308 (Democrats :Tough on Taxpayers, Soft on Terrorism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
The social conservatives should realize that to nominate Rudy Giuliani is sending the message that the issues of abortion, homosexual marriage, and gun control are now off the table in presidential politics. Just because abortion may never be illegal in my lifetime is no reason to stop fighting it. On the contrary, if we stop fighting it, it shows our cowardice in the face of legalized murder, and will make it all the more difficult to ever stop it.

Why are we asked to compromise? Why not vote for McCain? Oh, you mean McCain-Feingold is more important than abortion? A stupid law concocted by Democrats is more important than the dignity of human life? I cannot agree with that.

47 posted on 02/11/2007 1:14:23 PM PST by PatrickF4 (Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought. - JP II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
As I've said before, social voting in the age of world wide Islamic terrorism befuddles me.

I feel a historic remembrance coming on.

McClintock -vs- Shwarzenegger...

55 posted on 02/11/2007 1:22:42 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
You have posted an article from a site (411) that comments mainly on Pro Wrestling.

Quite fitting, as Rudy is as real a Republican as Pro Wrestling is a real sport.

60 posted on 02/11/2007 1:26:04 PM PST by metalurgist ("For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul?" No to Rudy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Rudy isn't perfect, but he's got my vote.


61 posted on 02/11/2007 1:26:24 PM PST by SeafoodGumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Rudy Giuliani has got what you need

The proper song lyric is:

A)

You can't always get what you want
You can't always get what you want
You can't always get what you want
But if you try sometimes you might find
You get what you need

B)

You, you got what I need but you say he's just a friend
And you say he's just a friend, oh baby

C)

I got what you need
So tell me what you need

or D)

I'll tell you what I want, what I really really want,
So tell me what you want, what you really really want,
I wanna, I wanna, I wanna, I wanna, I wanna really
really really wanna zigazig ha.

69 posted on 02/11/2007 1:32:30 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Posted this yesterday. Seems it's still apropos:

We ALL really need to calm down. The announced candidates have begun their campaigns (ie: fundraising drives) WAY too early. Some who may seem to have momentum at the moment will find America completely sick of them when it comes down to crunch time. Dark horses will surge only to fall back. Issues we haven't even thought of yet will be hotly debated. Gaffes will be made. Come November, 2007, or June, 2008 or, most certainly, November, 2008, things will be completely different than the way we view them now.

This preposterously early start for the campaign is, I think, an effort by the candidates to stretch out the fundraising "season" and the media to get more political bang for the buck, in controversy to feed their news programs, advertising for their bottom line, and advancement of their old-hippie agenda.

In other words, the politicos and the drive-bys are manipulating us AGAIN. Just look -- conservatives are already at each others throats -- just the way the media and the libs like it. Just like 2006.

We sheeple never, ever learn.


79 posted on 02/11/2007 1:38:22 PM PST by JennysCool (Blink 182 isn't just a band, it's Nancy Pelosi's per-minute average.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Another Rudy article using liberal amounts of lipstick.


81 posted on 02/11/2007 1:40:52 PM PST by KDD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Gun control helped control crime

No squishy, regulate the Second Amendment candidates for me, thanks.
88 posted on 02/11/2007 1:45:30 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Pubs are in the same situation as the RATS in '04--hold your nose when you vote. Like the RATS in '04, the Pubs will lose the WH because of this fact.


91 posted on 02/11/2007 1:46:39 PM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Now let's look at the candidate most likely to be beat Hillary Clinton should the Democrats opt to give her a run at the White House, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani.

This sentence assumes a great deal that may or may not be true. I personally don't believe that Rudy will survive the media onslaught which is coming the minute they believe he might actually win.

In point of fact, I don't think Rudy CAN beat Hillary for that very reason. I think even Romney has a better chance.

There are many MANY Americans who feel exactly like I do, and we are all entitled to a candidate that will support our interests as well.

The story isn't over because this guy (and apparently everyone else with a computer keyboard) says so.

94 posted on 02/11/2007 1:48:01 PM PST by tcostell (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Rudy Giuliani: Hillary Clinton with better dresses and better ankles.


102 posted on 02/11/2007 1:50:47 PM PST by EternalVigilance ("With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

"Maslow's hierarchy of needs is typically represented as a pyramid with the more primitive needs at the bottom and consisting of five levels: the four lower levels are grouped together as deficiency needs associated with physiological needs, while the top level is termed growth needs associated with psychological needs. While deficiency needs must be met, growth needs are continually shaping behavior. The basic concept is that the higher needs in this hierarchy only come into focus once all the needs that are lower down in the pyramid are mainly or entirely satisfied. Growth forces create upward movement in the hierarchy, whereas regressive forces push prepotent needs further down the hierarchy.

As you can see from the pyramid shown above, the first two levels of need are physical survival needs such as water, food, sleep, warmth and exercise and safety and security needs. The other more ethereal needs don't come into play until those two levels have been met."

The 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States is all about SECURITY! My right to possess firearms for my SECURITY are not "ethereal needs". My security starts at home. Any people who depend on their government for "security" will not be "secure" or free. Rudy Giuliani will continue his pogrom against gun owners if he becomes president.


104 posted on 02/11/2007 1:51:29 PM PST by ExpatGator (Extending logic since 1961.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

It won't matter what Giuliani thinks about about abortion if Iran drops a bomb on us.



And I suppose it won't matter if Rudy decides to confiscate all guns and declare martial law after Iran drops a bomb on us?

Sorry, but some of his lefty positions ARE important even in your alarmist scenarios.


108 posted on 02/11/2007 1:59:02 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Three reasons to suspect a government education here.

It starts out with the claim that social policy doesn't cut it anymore, then devotes about one-half the commentary to Rudy's liberal social policies...

managed public works efficiently~~ made Times Square safe for theatergoers~~ aggressive initiative against drunk drivers~~ ban on sex shops~~ new parkland~~ "Public safety is a fundamental civil right..."~~ child welfare~~ crackdown on deadbeat dads~~ identified children eligible for health insurance

Dragging in Maslow's hierarchy.

Can't spell supersede.

115 posted on 02/11/2007 2:04:07 PM PST by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
rudy giuliani Has Got What You Need...

IF you're a gun and 2nd Amendment-hating, abortion-supporting, illegal-loving liberal demonRAT or RINO.

134 posted on 02/11/2007 2:28:35 PM PST by DocH (Gun-grabbers, you can HAVE my guns... lead first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Let me explain it this way; You have what's called Maslow's Hierarchy of Human Needs, which is a theory in psychology that Abraham Maslow proposed in 1943 that states as humans meet 'basic needs', they seek to satisfy successively 'higher needs' that occupy a set hierarchy.

Reminds me of the folks around here who claim we shouldn't worry about huge spending increases because the focus is on fighting terror. As though the president is totally incapable of dealing with more than one subject at a given time.

That kind of "logic" has never made any sense to me. There's no reason we can't fight terror, appoint strict constructionist judges, and protect gun rights at the same time.

137 posted on 02/11/2007 2:32:01 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
As a Conservative first and Republican second, Rudy presents some irreconcilable differences for me.
Rudy                Duncan
---------------     -----------------------
Pro-abort           Pro-life
Gun grabber         Pro-2nd amendment
Pro-queer           Pro-traditional family
Pro-RINO            Conservative
Lots 'o baggage     Just a small carryon :)
Duncan Hunter is the ONLY declared conservative in the race.

Primaries are about philosophy, general elections are about parties.

There are FReepers on here trying to portray Rudy as a "conservative." In no way is Rudy a conservative. If elected there isn't a doubt in my mind that he would vigorously pursue the War On Terror. But his domestic policies, especially his social policies, would be a disaster for this country.

And for those who claim Duncan Hunter has no name recognition, let me remind you that Bill Clinton had no name recognition starting off either. It CAN be done. How 'bout, instead of complaining that Mr. Hunter has no name recognition or money, donating to his campaign and doing what you can to spread his name and conservative agenda.

158 posted on 02/11/2007 2:48:50 PM PST by upchuck (Wanted: Conservatives to go read this: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1771175/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson