Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Border agents who testified against convicted co-workers will be fired
The Inland Valley Daily Bulletin ^ | February 10, 2007 | Sara A. Carter

Posted on 02/10/2007 5:42:48 AM PST by truthkeeper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 301-311 next last
To: DCPatriot

Why are you on this thread to once again trumpet your open border policy? That isn't the subject of this thread. It's about a miscarriage of justice for two American Hispanic Border Patrol Agents, who have unfairly been sent to prison for doing their jobs -- and by extension taking away your cheap labor pool in DC.


201 posted on 02/10/2007 10:13:11 AM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: hershey

globalization has a few potholes

--

potholes? is that a play on words. ;-)

like holes in borders where pot and other stuff can flow freely and unimpeded?


202 posted on 02/10/2007 10:15:40 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

Somebody beter get their head(s) out of their a** pretty soon or nobody will want to waer a law enforcement of ANY kind.


203 posted on 02/10/2007 10:17:23 AM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn
I did not hijack this thread.

I am responding to those that disagreed with my position on the 2 rogue border patrol agents.

Please don't respond to me in the future.

I've read your drama queen antics on the Anna Nicole thread.

Get help.

204 posted on 02/10/2007 10:18:24 AM PST by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

But I still wonder why the government went after them with such a vicious vengeance when, as you pointed out, "benign neglect" had been working just fine for the open-borders crowd for decades.

I think the answer is us - they are concerned about people like us. As long as illegal immigration was mostly a border-states issue, and mostly confined to a few neighborhoods and a few cities, it was tolerable, and the voices against it could be ignored. Now illegal issues are nationwide, visible, and problematic.

But most importantly, now there are many, many cranky, outspoken Americans who are openly questioning our government's "immigration policy". I think that's the big change.

205 posted on 02/10/2007 10:23:22 AM PST by SuzyQue (Remember to think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: antisocial
WND has an article about Aldrette's cell phone being found in the van, yet Sutton said many times there was no evidence against him.

From reports I've read, Johnny Sutton is a real piece of "work".

Sutton claimed the illegal drug smuggler was shot in the back. The truth is that he was shot in the left side. As the illegal drug smuggler is left handed that is exactly how he would turn and point a gun at an approaching law enforcement officer.

Sutton claimed the agents didn't file a written report. Border Patrol regulations prohibit agents from filing a written report in a shooting incident, the supervisor or investigator must file the written report within three hours.

Just two of the many falsehoods told in this case.

206 posted on 02/10/2007 10:24:18 AM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: angelsonmyside

It is high time to smoke him out of his little hole and shed some light on his rise to Congressman from this most corrupt part of the U.S. border that he was in charge of for all those years.


207 posted on 02/10/2007 10:24:36 AM PST by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

See my response #205. Your thoughts?


208 posted on 02/10/2007 10:25:57 AM PST by SuzyQue (Remember to think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot

I was hardly a drama queen on the Anna Nicole thread... and you only knew I was there because you tried to hijack over there, too.. just like you did this thread. Before you comment on the merits or lack of on Compean and Ramos you need to read the facts of the case. This isn't about Mexican's at your local 711 in DC, that is for other threads. This is about miscarriage of justice.


209 posted on 02/10/2007 10:28:04 AM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: BearCub
Those guys shot someone in the back

The illegal drug smuggler was shot in the left side of his buttocks.

Said drug smuggler is left handed, a bullet entering his left side fits exactly with the BP agents' claim that he turned and pointed, very possibly, a weapon at them.

A little bit of the true destroys Johnny Sutton's case.

210 posted on 02/10/2007 10:33:06 AM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; DCPatriot
I doubt, DC, that you have to deal with the consequences of large numbers of illegal aliens in your neighborhood. Your business gets to profit from the availability of illegal labor, you go home and leave others to cope with the crime.

This known as privatizing the profit while socializing (making the citizens and taxpayers pay) the costs. John Q Citizen gets the effed up schools and neighborhoods while DC takes home the profits. DC is probably small potatoes. This is much more pernicious when big business does it.

211 posted on 02/10/2007 10:33:37 AM PST by dennisw (What one man can do another can do -- "The Edge")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot

"The bigotry and xenophobia shown in these threads is nauseating"

In case you hadn't noticed, former agents Ramos and Compean are both Hispanic themselves, DCPatriot. So, the bigotry smear doesn't quite cut it in this instance.


212 posted on 02/10/2007 10:38:01 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: AprilfromTexas

I didn't have a sarc tag, April : ) I meant it.

I probably sounded sarcastic because I'm wistfully wishing someone like this would stand up for our Marines. Pray for them.


213 posted on 02/10/2007 10:38:09 AM PST by freema (Marine FRiend, 1stCuz2xRemoved, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
At this point I cannot imagine why ANYONE would consider working for the Border Patrol. Mission accomplished I guess.

Yep, this administration will continue its middle-finger open borders policies no matter the human or financial cost.

214 posted on 02/10/2007 10:39:57 AM PST by janetgreen (Comprehensive immigration reform = AMNESTY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RJL
From reports I've read, Johnny Sutton is a real piece of "work".

I have read so many articles and do not remember where I read this but isn't Sutton the same one that convicted the Sheriff that shot at an illegal for trying to run over him?
215 posted on 02/10/2007 10:47:30 AM PST by angelsonmyside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: devolve
Good post devolve. I have not read through the thread but surely this information justifies an appeal.

The information that the bullet fragments in the butt and leg could have come from any of 4 different guns is appalling!

Whatta jury these guys had.

216 posted on 02/10/2007 10:48:34 AM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: freema
We are... actually there was another thread last night about an outright lie Alan Colmes tried to perpetrate to Ollie North last night saying they were guilty... an email campaign ensued.

They are victims, just as our border patrol agents are victims... in both cases they are guilty of doing their jobs and defending our country, but are being sacraficed on the alter of politics.

217 posted on 02/10/2007 10:49:20 AM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

What was the make up of that jury? Is there a chance they would have been prejudiced by the lie that they said they "wanted to shoot some Mexican's"??


218 posted on 02/10/2007 10:50:37 AM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: devolve; Arizona Carolyn

I keep so busy making graphics that sadly I don't keep up on the information and don't know the answer to that.


219 posted on 02/10/2007 10:54:59 AM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue
I'm afraid I must've mangled my point. The U.S. government kicked a hornets' nest with this over-the-top prosecution. It's an incredibly dumb move which has really hurt the open-borders-amnesty movement. Hence, it doesn't make sense.
220 posted on 02/10/2007 11:00:53 AM PST by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 301-311 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson