Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon: Pre-War Intelligence Was Legit
AP ^ | 2-8-07 | Robert Burns

Posted on 02/08/2007 7:58:32 PM PST by ikez78

Thursday February 8, 2007 10:01 PM

AP Photo BAG108

By ROBERT BURNS

AP Military Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Some of the Pentagon's prewar intelligence work, including a contention that the CIA underplayed the likelihood of al-Qaida connections to Saddam Hussein, was inappropriate but not illegal, a Defense Department investigation has concluded.

In a report to be presented to Congress on Friday, the department's inspector general clears former Pentagon policy chief Douglas J. Feith of allegations by some Democrats of illegal activities - specifically that he misled Congress about the basis of the administration's assertions on the threat posed by Iraq.

Two people familiar with the findings discussed the main points and some details Thursday on condition they not be identified.

The Senate Armed Services Committee has scheduled a hearing Friday to receive the findings by Thomas F. Gimble, the Pentagon's acting inspector general. The committee's chairman, Carl Levin, D-Mich., has been a leading critic of Feith's role in prewar intelligence activities and has accused him of deceiving Congress.

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraqalqaeda; prewardocs; prewarintel

1 posted on 02/08/2007 7:58:35 PM PST by ikez78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ikez78

I thought only bad stuff gets leaked...there must be a catch in there somwhere


2 posted on 02/08/2007 7:59:52 PM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

The catch is that the dribble worked. The dems took over congress, so this doesn't matter any more.


3 posted on 02/08/2007 8:01:54 PM PST by Perdogg (Happy 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ikez78
IF, this gets any play on the MSM, it will certainly be
downplayed or discredited....JJ61
4 posted on 02/08/2007 8:02:27 PM PST by JerseyJohn61 (Better Late Than Never.......sometimes over lapping is worth the effort....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

you're right. Feith decieved. Denny Hastert covered up Mark Foley. The economy is not as good as it looks. Etc. The Libs kept it up, and keep boasting of a "sea change" in popular opinion favoring the Left, having thrown the rotten GOPers out on their bums in November.

A baboon in a dress could have been elected in the sixth year midterm of an incumbent presidency.


5 posted on 02/08/2007 8:21:59 PM PST by cyberdasher (Wikistan.com - Sixth Year Baboons (OK, it's late and I'm sleeeeeep -uhh. . . . . . ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

The catch is in what they said about the pre-war intel. I was DUmpster-diving over on the KOmmie site tonight and found this little gem:

"BREAKING: On eve of hearing, DOD IG says Feith cooked intel"

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/2/8/192332/0642

They're keying in on this segment:

"Some of the Pentagon's prewar intelligence work, including a contention that the CIA underplayed the likelihood of al-Qaida connections to Saddam Hussein, was inappropriate but not illegal, a Defense Department investigation has concluded."

IOW, they're claiming that the report shows that Feith lied about al-Qaida connections to Hussein.


6 posted on 02/08/2007 8:26:55 PM PST by Purrcival (Dare we hope that even a D.C. jury can sort this Libby trial out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ikez78
Some of the Pentagon's prewar intelligence work, including a contention that the CIA underplayed the likelihood of al-Qaida connections to Saddam Hussein, was inappropriate but not illegal, a Defense Department investigation has concluded.

Mark, do they mean that the CIA was wrong in "underestimating" Saddam connection to Al Qaeda? Or is it the opposite?

7 posted on 02/08/2007 8:36:19 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Purrcival

I would like for them to get up to date. If they don't. one day Levin will peer over his glasses and say huh? to news of another attack.


8 posted on 02/08/2007 8:41:44 PM PST by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

this is only a leak of what the report WILL say, it's not released yet. we should skim it when it's out


9 posted on 02/08/2007 8:54:54 PM PST by ikez78 (www.regimeofterror.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson