Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Well, we know a representative of the media would never lie, Right?
1 posted on 02/07/2007 2:32:13 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NormsRevenge

Tim Russert, Washington bureau chief of NBC News, uses crutches to walk into U.S. Federal Court in Washington, Wednesday, Feb. 7, 2007 for the I. Lewis 'Scooter' Libby perjury trial. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)


2 posted on 02/07/2007 2:32:44 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

You know how you can tell Russert's lying?


3 posted on 02/07/2007 2:33:19 PM PST by Ben Mugged (Always cheat; always win. The only unfair fight is the one you lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Did Libby's attorneys get to cross Russert? That is what I have been looking forward to.


5 posted on 02/07/2007 2:35:16 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Time to drag Andrea Greenspan's bony a$$ to the stand!
6 posted on 02/07/2007 2:35:50 PM PST by johnny7 ("We took a hell of a beating." -'Vinegar Joe' Stilwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
LOL.....and a politico wouldn't????.....I wonder where this he said, she said will end up?.....I don't trust politicians any more then media.....even the Republicans unfortunately......
7 posted on 02/07/2007 2:36:06 PM PST by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Russert originally told the FBI that he couldn't rule out discussing Wilson with Libby but had no recollection of it, according to an FBI report Wells read in court. Russert said Wednesday he did not believe he said that.

Actually, contrary to the flipping headline, Russert contradicted HIMSELF!

9 posted on 02/07/2007 2:36:44 PM PST by MortMan (Middle Age: When playing like a child makes you feel like an old man the next morning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

How about a new rule on FR. NO MORE SCOOTER LIBBY POSTS.

I couldn't care less about this whole leftist wet-dream FARCE.

Talk to me about the prosecution of Sandy Berglar.


12 posted on 02/07/2007 2:38:06 PM PST by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

"Russert originally told the FBI that he couldn't rule out discussing Wilson with Libby but had no recollection of it, according to an FBI report Wells read in court. Russert said Wednesday he did not believe he said that."

If he couldn't remember then how is it he remembers today? If all the witnesses can't rememeber exactly what happened at that time then that testimony is tainted if they say they rememeber now.


13 posted on 02/07/2007 2:38:18 PM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin; Mo1; onyx; Txsleuth; Carolinamom

FYI


18 posted on 02/07/2007 2:40:47 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
That's what I want to know. What gives Russert irrefutable credibility?
Russert and his toady Mathews are trying to be the next Woodward and Bernstein.
19 posted on 02/07/2007 2:42:10 PM PST by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Russert originally told the FBI that he couldn't rule out discussing Wilson with Libby but had no recollection of it, according to an FBI report Wells read in court. Russert said Wednesday he did not believe he said that.

Ok, so let me get this straight.
1. According to an FBI report, Russert told the FBI that he couldn't rule out discussing Wilson with Libby, but had no recollection of it.
2. A couple of years later, Russert said he does not believe that he said what the FBI claims he said to them, BUT NOW he knows for sure that he DIDN'T talk about the previous topic in a conversation that he said he had no recollection of.

If the defense lawyers left him with even an ounce of credibility, then they owe Libby a refund.

22 posted on 02/07/2007 2:42:43 PM PST by VRWCmember (Everyone is entitled to my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
"Libby has said that, at the end of the call, Russert brought up war critic Joseph Wilson and mentioned that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA. "That would be impossible," Russert testified Wednesday. "I didn't know who that person was until several days later."

Russert knows that no one can challenge this information because it is his word against Libby's. Because of this, Libby can be charged for perjury? It does have an element of doubt; especially giving Russert's track record against the Bush Administration.

23 posted on 02/07/2007 2:45:42 PM PST by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

28 posted on 02/07/2007 2:54:07 PM PST by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Russert wants to keep his job!

Because of that .. I don't believe ANYTHING any reporter says - especially NBC, ABC or CNN


47 posted on 02/07/2007 5:43:50 PM PST by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

That's one of the things that mystifies me about Hannity. He'll have this lying sack of potatoes on his radio show and call him friend, all the while this traitor is seeking to undermine the President and stab the troops in the back.


50 posted on 02/07/2007 7:12:08 PM PST by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson