Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russert contradicts Libby's testimony
AP on Yahoo ^ | 2/7/07 | Matt Apuzzo - ap

Posted on 02/07/2007 2:32:08 PM PST by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON - NBC newsman Tim Russert testified Wednesday he never discussed a CIA operative with vice presidential aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, contradicting Libby's version to a grand jury in the CIA leak investigation.

The testimony came as prosecutors prepared to rest their perjury case against Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff.

Russert, the host of "Meet the Press," testified about a July 2003 phone call in which Libby complained about a colleague's coverage. Libby has said that, at the end of the call, Russert brought up war critic Joseph Wilson and mentioned that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA.

"That would be impossible," Russert testified Wednesday. "I didn't know who that person was until several days later."

That discrepancy is at the heart of Libby's perjury and obstruction trial. He is accused of lying to investigators about his conversations with reporters regarding Wilson's wife, CIA operative Valerie Plame.

During Libby's 2004 grand jury testimony, he said Russert told him "all the reporters know" that Wilson's wife worked at the CIA. Libby now acknowledges he had learned about Plame a month earlier from Cheney but says he had forgotten about it and learned it again from Russert as if new.

Libby subsequently repeated the information about Plame to other journalists, always with the caveat that he had heard it from reporters, he has said. Prosecutors say Libby concocted the Russert conversation to shield him from prosecution for revealing information from government sources.

Plame's identity was leaked shortly after her husband began accusing the Bush administration of doctoring prewar intelligence on Iraq. The controversy over the faulty intelligence was a major story in mid-2003.

Given that news climate, defense attorney Theodore Wells was skeptical about Russert's account.

"You have the chief of staff of the vice president of the United States on the telephone and you don't ask him one question about it?" Wells asked. He followed up moments later with, "As a newsperson who's known for being aggressive and going after the facts, you wouldn't have asked him about the biggest stories in the world that week?"

"What happened is exactly what I told you," Russert replied.

Russert originally told the FBI that he couldn't rule out discussing Wilson with Libby but had no recollection of it, according to an FBI report Wells read in court. Russert said Wednesday he did not believe he said that.

Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald has spent weeks making the case that Libby was preoccupied with discrediting Wilson. Several former White House, CIA and State Department officials testified that Libby discussed Plame with them — all before the Russert conversation.

Fitzgerald has said Russert would be his final witness. Prosecutors spent the past few days playing audiotapes of Libby's grand jury testimony in court. In the final hours of those tapes Wednesday, Libby described a tense mood in the White House as the leak investigation began.

Though President Bush was publicly stating that nobody in the White House was involved in the leak, Libby knew that he himself had spoken to several reporters about Plame. He said he did not bring that up with Bush and was uncertain whether he discussed it with Cheney.

Libby did remember one conversation with Cheney, however, in which the vice president seemed surprised when told by his aide where Libby had learned Plame's identity.

"From me?" Cheney asked, tilting his head, Libby recalled.

Libby said he had forgotten that Cheney was his original source until finding his own handwritten notes on the conversation. The notes predated the Russert phone call by more than a month.

___

Associated Press writer Pete Yost contributed to this report.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: contradicts; fitzfong; russert; scooterlibby; testimony
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
Well, we know a representative of the media would never lie, Right?
1 posted on 02/07/2007 2:32:13 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Tim Russert, Washington bureau chief of NBC News, uses crutches to walk into U.S. Federal Court in Washington, Wednesday, Feb. 7, 2007 for the I. Lewis 'Scooter' Libby perjury trial. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)


2 posted on 02/07/2007 2:32:44 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

You know how you can tell Russert's lying?


3 posted on 02/07/2007 2:33:19 PM PST by Ben Mugged (Always cheat; always win. The only unfair fight is the one you lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

from day 1....

R-U-S-S-E-R-T


4 posted on 02/07/2007 2:35:03 PM PST by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Did Libby's attorneys get to cross Russert? That is what I have been looking forward to.


5 posted on 02/07/2007 2:35:16 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Time to drag Andrea Greenspan's bony a$$ to the stand!
6 posted on 02/07/2007 2:35:50 PM PST by johnny7 ("We took a hell of a beating." -'Vinegar Joe' Stilwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
LOL.....and a politico wouldn't????.....I wonder where this he said, she said will end up?.....I don't trust politicians any more then media.....even the Republicans unfortunately......
7 posted on 02/07/2007 2:36:06 PM PST by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

They all knew who she was....they attending parties with them..


8 posted on 02/07/2007 2:36:15 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Russert originally told the FBI that he couldn't rule out discussing Wilson with Libby but had no recollection of it, according to an FBI report Wells read in court. Russert said Wednesday he did not believe he said that.

Actually, contrary to the flipping headline, Russert contradicted HIMSELF!

9 posted on 02/07/2007 2:36:44 PM PST by MortMan (Middle Age: When playing like a child makes you feel like an old man the next morning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

What really infuriates me is that Libby's defense team has not put the real liar, Joe Wilson, on the stand and made him answer numerous questions under oath on his constantly changing stories. Also, the defense could easily play several obvious lies from Russert's broadcasts, establish a pattern of hostility to republicans, put the entire media on trial in essence. They need to drill it to the jury over and over how this whole sham is due to Joe Wilson's lies.


10 posted on 02/07/2007 2:37:15 PM PST by mallardx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

Why should Russert just be given a pass? Why can't he be mistaken?

Oh. I forgot. He's MSM...we all know they *always" report the truth.


11 posted on 02/07/2007 2:37:42 PM PST by GOP_Proud (How covert was Valerie Plame at the CIA? Her top-secret code name was "Valerie Plame." ...Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

How about a new rule on FR. NO MORE SCOOTER LIBBY POSTS.

I couldn't care less about this whole leftist wet-dream FARCE.

Talk to me about the prosecution of Sandy Berglar.


12 posted on 02/07/2007 2:38:06 PM PST by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

"Russert originally told the FBI that he couldn't rule out discussing Wilson with Libby but had no recollection of it, according to an FBI report Wells read in court. Russert said Wednesday he did not believe he said that."

If he couldn't remember then how is it he remembers today? If all the witnesses can't rememeber exactly what happened at that time then that testimony is tainted if they say they rememeber now.


13 posted on 02/07/2007 2:38:18 PM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog

They all laughed and drank, wined and dined, knew everything but told THE BIG LIE.

Ask about the dinners together..ask about the dinners.

R-U-S-S-E-R-T


14 posted on 02/07/2007 2:38:49 PM PST by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dog

They all laughed and drank, wined and dined, knew everything but told THE BIG LIE.

Ask about the dinners together..ask about the dinners.

R-U-S-S-E-R-T


15 posted on 02/07/2007 2:38:59 PM PST by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mallardx

Wilson lied about who sent him to Niger - it wasn't Dick Cheney - it was a group at the CIA that included his wife. Wilson lied about documents he never saw and what his junket in Africa discovered and what it didn't.

Libby is on trial for lying to investigators, but the only proven liar in the entire saga thus far is JOE WILSON.


16 posted on 02/07/2007 2:40:21 PM PST by ConservativeMajority (Dems denounce Foley, but do they denounce NAMBLA?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Yes, read the article. who do you think Wells is?


17 posted on 02/07/2007 2:40:44 PM PST by erton1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Mo1; onyx; Txsleuth; Carolinamom

FYI


18 posted on 02/07/2007 2:40:47 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
That's what I want to know. What gives Russert irrefutable credibility?
Russert and his toady Mathews are trying to be the next Woodward and Bernstein.
19 posted on 02/07/2007 2:42:10 PM PST by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mallardx
What really infuriates me is that Libby's defense team has not put the real liar, Joe Wilson, on the stand

The judge wont let him because its not germane to whether Libby lied or not.

20 posted on 02/07/2007 2:42:30 PM PST by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson