Then one ought to conclude that only mass hysteria has convinced so many people otherwise.
Yes, I remember him and his little poem when he shattered his first backboard playing for the Philadelphia 76'ers:
Chocolate Thunder Flying, Robinzine crying, teeth shaking, glass breaking, wham-bam glass breaker, I am jam.
Oh, that was Darryl Dawkins, nevermind.
His analogies seem to me to be rather scrambled. Exactly which side is he lampooning?
Boobs believe in Dawkins. On the other hand, hip Hollywood celebrities believe that the so-called book was actually created by an alien monkey vomiting on papyrus, so I will believe that.
This is kinda cool.
If he didn't exist, it would be necessary to invent him.
I think Dawkins if descended from pond scum. I'm not sure what makes him better than pond scum either. Afterall, if there is no God, and we're all just chance collections of atoms, then what makes a human better than a roach?
sorry, couldn't help myself
Mark
Good article...thanks for posting.
...I like this guy's style
very clever...
To prove Dawkins existed, the author would have to have
followed him from birth to the present moment, and watched
every thing he did( yeah,even that), and he would have to
have testimony from everyone who says, "yeah, that's Dawkins".
He would have had to see the birth certificate made, etc.
But then, who's to say the observer is a victim of a cruel
joke, that the Dawkins is just a person created to meet
the need to have a Dawkins. Sort, of like the people on
the "Truman Show?" So the observer would need to have the
faith, that all he saw was true in the first place....how
could be prove that?
Well, the just shall live by faith....Sorry about that
Mr. Dawkins..
Richard Dawkins: "I stink, therefore I am."
2. Granting something to exist, its nature would be unknowable given that ultimately, its position in existence could not be understood.
3. Granting something to exist and that you could understand it, you couldn't explain it to someone else. There simply aren't enough words.
John Bunyan would be proud!!!
LOL Cute.
What would happen, if we were able to go back in time several hundred or thousands of years, and attempt to expain the internal combustion engine to people, especially the learned fold? The principles, science, mechanics, and physics of the engine has always existed. Just because no one could have made an engine with what was available a thousand years ago does not mean it could not have existed. Cannot the same be true of God? Maybe that is why it is a mystery - because most of us are not smart enough to figure Him out yet?
I guess I don’t exist, then. Unfortunately, the IRS doesn’t seem to agree.