Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Introducing Hannityspeak
RenewAmerica.us ^ | February 6, 2007 | Helen Valois

Posted on 02/06/2007 2:00:28 PM PST by EternalVigilance

Orwellian euphemism is nothing new in the realm of contemporary American political discourse. Choice, translated by the left, refers to the chopping up of unborn children. Peaceful patriotism permits the trashing of our troops. Just now in a shocking scandal for adjectives everywhere, verbal authorities have booked articulate for bearing concealed racial overtones. We shouldn't, but we do get acclimated to this kind of rank pseudo-intellectualism after a while. What is jarring is to hear linguistic engineering of mind-bending magnitude coming not from the left, but from conservative commentators themselves.

Monday night on Hannity and Colmes, RINO Rudi announced his intention of announcing his candidacy for the office of President of the United States, which is as close to making sense as the entire interview ever got. What we heard from the presumptive Republican front runner was the whole set of self-contradictions one would expect from a liberal hijacking a conservative ticket: that he is "personally opposed" to abortion while upholding a "woman's right to choose;" that he defines marriage as between a man and a woman but simultaneously supports "domestic partnerships;" that he is not for "amnesty" for undocumented workers but does believe in their "regularization," meaning that those who break immigration law should become the ones who make it. When John Kerry reverses himself over the course of several months on the subject of the war in Iraq, the right-wing talking heads never tire of highlighting it. But let the former mayor of New York thrash like a trout on a line in the course of a single interview, and everyone on our side of the aisle is supposed to nod in solemn wonder, if Hannity's handling of the whole farcical situation is any indication.

Giuliani's gymnastics would be unremarkable — they are certainly unoriginal — if not for the fact that this same man demonstrates lucidity and singularity of purpose when the terrorist threat to our nation is invoked. This, of course, is the pillar on which his "conservative" credentials are precariously teetering, the one issue alleged as trumping all the others. Pardon me. The word isn't trumping any more — a position which common sense and a moment's uninterrupted reflection will reveal as positively spurious. How can the right to liberty outrank the right to life? According to Sean Hannity's post-interview reflections, however, what Rudi has actually done isn't really waffling after all. For RINOs only, it is hereafter to be known as transcending the issues. That's what Sean said. Giuliani is succeeding, he believes, not in betraying conservative principles but in transcending them.

Judging by its context, his neologism must mean something like: "getting people to cave in about things it is positively disastrous for them to cave in about." Hannity seems to connect his inventive term with Dick Morris' revelation that three-quarters of the conservatives he talked to were ready to overlook Rudi's handicaps in the interest of defeating Hillary. (Wouldn't this be an insult to Obama, by the way, that it isn't in the interest of defeating him?) So, let's see how Hannityspeak would work out in other situations.

Bill Clinton in the waning days of his administration evidently did a bang-up job of transcending perjury (to pick a problem of his more or less at random). Who knew? I see now with the clarity of vision Sean has imparted that the trend in the European nations is towards transcending Islamofascism, not catering to it. It must also be the case that Terri Schindler Schiavo's right to life — sadly, according to just about the only high profile American journalist who truly extended himself in an effort to defend it — wasn't really violated in the end, but only transcended. And so forth.

If Rudi Giuliani or anybody like him manages to gain the support of a majority of conservatives, it will deal our cause a more serious blow than anything that Hillary or Barack or anybody else could do, from inside the White House or outside. Liberals can only set the conservative agenda back. RINOs are attempting to define it out of existence. If the handful of conservative commentators in the mainstream media decide to grease the linguistic wheels of this insidious effort, who is going to be able to stop it? Is it really a good thing, for the distinction between those who stand for what is right and just in this country, and those who do not, to be transcended at last?


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: adulterer; bluestaters; burnnycburn; combover; corrupt; fringe; giuliani; hannity; hannityis4chix; hannityspeak; jealous; limpnoodle; nutjobs; nyscks; rinos; rudigiuliani; rudymcromney; savagesupporter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 381-388 next last
To: dirtboy
Are you speaking about what you and your pals do?

If not, then I fail to see what point you are making.

61 posted on 02/06/2007 2:39:18 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt

Whatever.


62 posted on 02/06/2007 2:39:35 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I'm not playing anyone's arguing game.


63 posted on 02/06/2007 2:40:01 PM PST by Carolinamom (Whatever you voted for, you did not vote for failure -- President Bush SOTU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Are you speaking about what you and your pals do?

I have called my side on their excesses.

You, however, are among those engaging in excesses on your side.

64 posted on 02/06/2007 2:40:01 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
I'm not playing anyone's arguing game.

I guess that beats attempting to refute the core premise, since the core premise is accurate. Best just to launch a personal attack instead to distract from such.

65 posted on 02/06/2007 2:40:49 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Registered
the answer to a Rudy candidacy is for conservatives to put up a stronger Republican candidate, and Duncan Hunter ain't it.

Rudy's going to crash and burn, friend. If not now, in the general election for sure. And if by some miracle, he is elected, we've won absolutely nothing. In fact, socialism will move ahead faster under Giuliani than under any Democrat. Why? Because there will be no opposition to it. No conservative should support this for any reason.

I am truly amazed at how benighted and naive so many of you are. A Giuliani candidacy would split the GOP wide open. If you take comfort in the MSM polling data of-the-moment, be aware that you're living in a fool's paradise.
66 posted on 02/06/2007 2:41:08 PM PST by Antoninus ( Who is Duncan Hunter? Find out....www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
If Rudi Giuliani or anybody like him manages to gain the support of a majority of conservatives, it will deal our cause a more serious blow than anything that Hillary or Barack or anybody else could do, from inside the White House or outside. Liberals can only set the conservative agenda back. RINOs are attempting to define it out of existence.

Brilliant analysis. Right on the money.

67 posted on 02/06/2007 2:41:20 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Sure - that's why he's polling higher than any other Republican candidate.

For now. He's running on name recognition alone. That won't be enough to get him through the primaries. Folks will find out he's a liberal. And he'll lose.
68 posted on 02/06/2007 2:42:06 PM PST by Antoninus ( Who is Duncan Hunter? Find out....www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom

Its not that he's wrong, he just writes the first thing that falls from his fingertips. Often its a falsehood, sometimes a baldfaced lie.


69 posted on 02/06/2007 2:42:33 PM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Bingo.


70 posted on 02/06/2007 2:42:47 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I neither addressed you nor did I address a personal attack on you, so bug off.


71 posted on 02/06/2007 2:44:00 PM PST by Carolinamom (Whatever you voted for, you did not vote for failure -- President Bush SOTU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Whatever.

Spoken just like a fifth columnist.

72 posted on 02/06/2007 2:44:04 PM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
I neither addressed you nor did I address a personal attack on you, so bug off.

I addressed your personal attack on another poster in lieu of any discussion of the posted thread.

73 posted on 02/06/2007 2:44:33 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Self appointed body guard?


74 posted on 02/06/2007 2:46:25 PM PST by Carolinamom (Whatever you voted for, you did not vote for failure -- President Bush SOTU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
Self appointed body guard?

No, just someone sick of those who seek to drag all of these threads into the Backroom by engaging in attacks rather than making your own points, pro or con, about what is posted.

75 posted on 02/06/2007 2:47:34 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom

EVie needs defenders. They usually come away with less respect than before they came to his defense.


76 posted on 02/06/2007 2:47:36 PM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
EVie needs defenders. They usually come away with less respect than before they came to his defense.

EV doesn't need defenders. You could use a bit of a reminder about FR etiquitte - you know, the part where it is against the rules to drag disputes from thread to thread, as you are doing here.

77 posted on 02/06/2007 2:48:52 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
It would appear that the bar is pretty much laying flat on the ground for many around here now.

Well, old friend, there's still a few of us willing to keep the torch lit. Welcome to Jurassic Park.

78 posted on 02/06/2007 2:50:30 PM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt

Keep bumping the thread, troll. Wouldn't want actual FR conservatives to miss Helen Valois' brilliant dissection of Lefty Giuliani's pathetic performance.


79 posted on 02/06/2007 2:50:50 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Peach

That rating only comes from the 90% of the GOP routinely called "RINO" by the Implacables.


80 posted on 02/06/2007 2:51:06 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Defeat Hillary's V'assed Left Wing Conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 381-388 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson