Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zbigreddogz
---"There is absolutely nothing inconsistent about these two statements."---

They are entirely contradictory. He says now that he has always believed that marriage should be between a man and a woman, but just a short while ago he was adamantly and publicly opposed to the country taking action to define marriage as such. No, Rudy didn't oppose a ban on civil unions - he opposed a ban on same-sex marriage. That is a contradiction; and it is a lie for him to say he has always supported the aforementioned definition.
153 posted on 02/06/2007 11:51:09 AM PST by TitansAFC (Pacifism is not peace; pacifists are not peacemakers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: TitansAFC
You apparently don't speak English all that well.

1. Opposing a ban on something that is already illegal is not the same thing as promoting that such a thing be legal.

2. In plain English, he said he didn't support a ban "at this time," clearly meaning he at least would be open to supporting such a thing should it become necessary.

If you are still confused, I recommend you buying a copy of this book:


160 posted on 02/06/2007 11:57:07 AM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson