[zbigreddogz]

You apparently don't speak English all that well.

1. Opposing a ban on something that is already illegal is not the same thing as promoting that such a thing be legal.

2. In plain English, he said he didn't support a ban "at this time," clearly meaning he at least would be open to supporting such a thing should it become necessary.

If you are still confused, I recommend you buying a copy of this book:

[TitansAFC]

Right,

Were you John Kerry's campaign adviser?

I'm sure he came out publicly against the ban - because he really believed in the cause or was on the fence.

Lots of people do that - oppose a sitting President's attempt to define marriage as between one man and one woman - while still holding the staunch belief that marriage should only be between a man and woman.

It's kind of like supporting the War on Terror by publicly opposing the Patriot Act while personally supporting police and federal agents in their pursuit of terrorists. Or like supporting the War in Iraq by opposing any affirmation of troop support, but personally holding the deep belief that you support the troops.

Heck, Hitlery looks better and better if we can apply the Giuliani Rule universally!